Cargando…
Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool
BACKGROUND: The lack of attention to Indigenous epistemologies and, more broadly, Indigenous values in primary research, is mirrored in the standardised critical appraisal tools used to guide evidence-based practice and systematic reviews and meta-syntheses. These critical appraisal tools offer no g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32276606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3 |
_version_ | 1783520344252874752 |
---|---|
author | Harfield, Stephen Pearson, Odette Morey, Kim Kite, Elaine Canuto, Karla Glover, Karen Gomersall, Judith Streak Carter, Drew Davy, Carol Aromataris, Edoardo Braunack-Mayer, Annette |
author_facet | Harfield, Stephen Pearson, Odette Morey, Kim Kite, Elaine Canuto, Karla Glover, Karen Gomersall, Judith Streak Carter, Drew Davy, Carol Aromataris, Edoardo Braunack-Mayer, Annette |
author_sort | Harfield, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The lack of attention to Indigenous epistemologies and, more broadly, Indigenous values in primary research, is mirrored in the standardised critical appraisal tools used to guide evidence-based practice and systematic reviews and meta-syntheses. These critical appraisal tools offer no guidance on how validity or contextual relevance should be assessed for Indigenous populations and cultural contexts. Failure to tailor the research questions, design, analysis, dissemination and knowledge translation to capture understandings that are specific to Indigenous peoples results in research of limited acceptability and benefit and potentially harms Indigenous peoples. A specific Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool is needed to address this gap. METHOD: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool (QAT) was developed using a modified Nominal Group and Delphi Techniques and the tool’s validity, reliability, and feasibility were assessed over three stages of independent piloting. National and international research guidelines were used as points of reference. Piloting of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous experts led to refinement of the tool. RESULTS: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT consists of 14 questions that assess the quality of health research from an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspective. The questions encompass setting appropriate research questions; community engagement and consultation; research leadership and governance; community protocols; intellectual and cultural property rights; the collection and management of research material; Indigenous research paradigms; a strength-based approach to research; the translation of findings into policy and practice; benefits to participants and communities involved; and capacity strengthening and two-way learning. Outcomes from the assessment of the tool’s validity, reliability, and feasibility were overall positive. CONCLUSION: This is the first tool to appraise research quality from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. Through the uptake of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT we hope to improve the quality and transparency of research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, with the potential for greater improvements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and wellbeing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7147059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71470592020-04-18 Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool Harfield, Stephen Pearson, Odette Morey, Kim Kite, Elaine Canuto, Karla Glover, Karen Gomersall, Judith Streak Carter, Drew Davy, Carol Aromataris, Edoardo Braunack-Mayer, Annette BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The lack of attention to Indigenous epistemologies and, more broadly, Indigenous values in primary research, is mirrored in the standardised critical appraisal tools used to guide evidence-based practice and systematic reviews and meta-syntheses. These critical appraisal tools offer no guidance on how validity or contextual relevance should be assessed for Indigenous populations and cultural contexts. Failure to tailor the research questions, design, analysis, dissemination and knowledge translation to capture understandings that are specific to Indigenous peoples results in research of limited acceptability and benefit and potentially harms Indigenous peoples. A specific Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool is needed to address this gap. METHOD: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool (QAT) was developed using a modified Nominal Group and Delphi Techniques and the tool’s validity, reliability, and feasibility were assessed over three stages of independent piloting. National and international research guidelines were used as points of reference. Piloting of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous experts led to refinement of the tool. RESULTS: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT consists of 14 questions that assess the quality of health research from an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspective. The questions encompass setting appropriate research questions; community engagement and consultation; research leadership and governance; community protocols; intellectual and cultural property rights; the collection and management of research material; Indigenous research paradigms; a strength-based approach to research; the translation of findings into policy and practice; benefits to participants and communities involved; and capacity strengthening and two-way learning. Outcomes from the assessment of the tool’s validity, reliability, and feasibility were overall positive. CONCLUSION: This is the first tool to appraise research quality from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. Through the uptake of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander QAT we hope to improve the quality and transparency of research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, with the potential for greater improvements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and wellbeing. BioMed Central 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7147059/ /pubmed/32276606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harfield, Stephen Pearson, Odette Morey, Kim Kite, Elaine Canuto, Karla Glover, Karen Gomersall, Judith Streak Carter, Drew Davy, Carol Aromataris, Edoardo Braunack-Mayer, Annette Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title | Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title_full | Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title_fullStr | Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title_short | Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool |
title_sort | assessing the quality of health research from an indigenous perspective: the aboriginal and torres strait islander quality appraisal tool |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32276606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harfieldstephen assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT pearsonodette assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT moreykim assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT kiteelaine assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT canutokarla assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT gloverkaren assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT gomersalljudithstreak assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT carterdrew assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT davycarol assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT aromatarisedoardo assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool AT braunackmayerannette assessingthequalityofhealthresearchfromanindigenousperspectivetheaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderqualityappraisaltool |