Cargando…

Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study

BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and reada...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam, Muñoz-Perez, Maria José, Robledo-Vega, Carolina, Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda, Soto-Vega, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32250960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18444
_version_ 1783520399152119808
author Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam
Muñoz-Perez, Maria José
Robledo-Vega, Carolina
Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda
Soto-Vega, Elena
author_facet Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam
Muñoz-Perez, Maria José
Robledo-Vega, Carolina
Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda
Soto-Vega, Elena
author_sort Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. METHODS: The search was based on the term “Wuhan Coronavirus” on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. RESULTS: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7147328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71473282020-04-21 Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam Muñoz-Perez, Maria José Robledo-Vega, Carolina Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda Soto-Vega, Elena JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. METHODS: The search was based on the term “Wuhan Coronavirus” on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. RESULTS: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19. JMIR Publications 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7147328/ /pubmed/32250960 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18444 Text en ©Jose Yunam Cuan-Baltazar, Maria José Muñoz-Perez, Carolina Robledo-Vega, Maria Fernanda Pérez-Zepeda, Elena Soto-Vega. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 09.04.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam
Muñoz-Perez, Maria José
Robledo-Vega, Carolina
Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda
Soto-Vega, Elena
Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title_full Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title_fullStr Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title_full_unstemmed Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title_short Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study
title_sort misinformation of covid-19 on the internet: infodemiology study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32250960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18444
work_keys_str_mv AT cuanbaltazarjoseyunam misinformationofcovid19ontheinternetinfodemiologystudy
AT munozperezmariajose misinformationofcovid19ontheinternetinfodemiologystudy
AT robledovegacarolina misinformationofcovid19ontheinternetinfodemiologystudy
AT perezzepedamariafernanda misinformationofcovid19ontheinternetinfodemiologystudy
AT sotovegaelena misinformationofcovid19ontheinternetinfodemiologystudy