Cargando…
Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops
This paper reviews the use of modern 3D image-based and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) methods of surface reconstruction techniques for high fidelity surveys of small rock outcrops to highlight their potential within structural geology and landscape protection. LiDAR and Structure from Motion (...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061663 |
_version_ | 1783520407863689216 |
---|---|
author | Mikita, Tomáš Balková, Marie Bajer, Aleš Cibulka, Miloš Patočka, Zdeněk |
author_facet | Mikita, Tomáš Balková, Marie Bajer, Aleš Cibulka, Miloš Patočka, Zdeněk |
author_sort | Mikita, Tomáš |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reviews the use of modern 3D image-based and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) methods of surface reconstruction techniques for high fidelity surveys of small rock outcrops to highlight their potential within structural geology and landscape protection. LiDAR and Structure from Motion (SfM) software provide useful opportunities for rock outcrops mapping and 3D model creation. The accuracy of these surface reconstructions is crucial for quantitative structural analysis. However, these technologies require either a costly data acquisition device (Terrestrial LiDAR) or specialized image processing software (SfM). Recent developments in augmented reality and smartphone technologies, such as increased processing capacity and higher resolution of cameras, may offer a simple and inexpensive alternative for 3D surface reconstruction. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to show the possibilities of using smartphone applications for model creation and to determine their accuracy for rock outcrop mapping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7147376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71473762020-04-20 Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops Mikita, Tomáš Balková, Marie Bajer, Aleš Cibulka, Miloš Patočka, Zdeněk Sensors (Basel) Article This paper reviews the use of modern 3D image-based and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) methods of surface reconstruction techniques for high fidelity surveys of small rock outcrops to highlight their potential within structural geology and landscape protection. LiDAR and Structure from Motion (SfM) software provide useful opportunities for rock outcrops mapping and 3D model creation. The accuracy of these surface reconstructions is crucial for quantitative structural analysis. However, these technologies require either a costly data acquisition device (Terrestrial LiDAR) or specialized image processing software (SfM). Recent developments in augmented reality and smartphone technologies, such as increased processing capacity and higher resolution of cameras, may offer a simple and inexpensive alternative for 3D surface reconstruction. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to show the possibilities of using smartphone applications for model creation and to determine their accuracy for rock outcrop mapping. MDPI 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7147376/ /pubmed/32192071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061663 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mikita, Tomáš Balková, Marie Bajer, Aleš Cibulka, Miloš Patočka, Zdeněk Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title | Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title_full | Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title_short | Comparison of Different Remote Sensing Methods for 3D Modeling of Small Rock Outcrops |
title_sort | comparison of different remote sensing methods for 3d modeling of small rock outcrops |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikitatomas comparisonofdifferentremotesensingmethodsfor3dmodelingofsmallrockoutcrops AT balkovamarie comparisonofdifferentremotesensingmethodsfor3dmodelingofsmallrockoutcrops AT bajerales comparisonofdifferentremotesensingmethodsfor3dmodelingofsmallrockoutcrops AT cibulkamilos comparisonofdifferentremotesensingmethodsfor3dmodelingofsmallrockoutcrops AT patockazdenek comparisonofdifferentremotesensingmethodsfor3dmodelingofsmallrockoutcrops |