Cargando…
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528 |
_version_ | 1783520417092206592 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Li C. Egemen, Didem Chen, Xiaojian Katki, Hormuzd A. Demarco, Maria Wiser, Amy L. Perkins, Rebecca B. Guido, Richard S. Wentzensen, Nicolas Schiffman, Mark |
author_facet | Cheung, Li C. Egemen, Didem Chen, Xiaojian Katki, Hormuzd A. Demarco, Maria Wiser, Amy L. Perkins, Rebecca B. Guido, Richard S. Wentzensen, Nicolas Schiffman, Mark |
author_sort | Cheung, Li C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. METHODS: Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. RESULTS: Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.(1) and Demarco et al.(2) Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7147416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71474162020-04-24 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation Cheung, Li C. Egemen, Didem Chen, Xiaojian Katki, Hormuzd A. Demarco, Maria Wiser, Amy L. Perkins, Rebecca B. Guido, Richard S. Wentzensen, Nicolas Schiffman, Mark J Low Genit Tract Dis Risk Based Guidelines OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. METHODS: Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. RESULTS: Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.(1) and Demarco et al.(2) Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7147416/ /pubmed/32243306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Risk Based Guidelines Cheung, Li C. Egemen, Didem Chen, Xiaojian Katki, Hormuzd A. Demarco, Maria Wiser, Amy L. Perkins, Rebecca B. Guido, Richard S. Wentzensen, Nicolas Schiffman, Mark 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title | 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title_full | 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title_fullStr | 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title_short | 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation |
title_sort | 2019 asccp risk-based management consensus guidelines: methods for risk estimation, recommended management, and validation |
topic | Risk Based Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheunglic 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT egemendidem 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT chenxiaojian 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT katkihormuzda 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT demarcomaria 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT wiseramyl 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT perkinsrebeccab 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT guidorichards 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT wentzensennicolas 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation AT schiffmanmark 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation |