Cargando…

2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation

OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Li C., Egemen, Didem, Chen, Xiaojian, Katki, Hormuzd A., Demarco, Maria, Wiser, Amy L., Perkins, Rebecca B., Guido, Richard S., Wentzensen, Nicolas, Schiffman, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528
_version_ 1783520417092206592
author Cheung, Li C.
Egemen, Didem
Chen, Xiaojian
Katki, Hormuzd A.
Demarco, Maria
Wiser, Amy L.
Perkins, Rebecca B.
Guido, Richard S.
Wentzensen, Nicolas
Schiffman, Mark
author_facet Cheung, Li C.
Egemen, Didem
Chen, Xiaojian
Katki, Hormuzd A.
Demarco, Maria
Wiser, Amy L.
Perkins, Rebecca B.
Guido, Richard S.
Wentzensen, Nicolas
Schiffman, Mark
author_sort Cheung, Li C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. METHODS: Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. RESULTS: Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.(1) and Demarco et al.(2) Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7147416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71474162020-04-24 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation Cheung, Li C. Egemen, Didem Chen, Xiaojian Katki, Hormuzd A. Demarco, Maria Wiser, Amy L. Perkins, Rebecca B. Guido, Richard S. Wentzensen, Nicolas Schiffman, Mark J Low Genit Tract Dis Risk Based Guidelines OBJECTIVE: To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. METHODS: Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. RESULTS: Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.(1) and Demarco et al.(2) Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7147416/ /pubmed/32243306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Risk Based Guidelines
Cheung, Li C.
Egemen, Didem
Chen, Xiaojian
Katki, Hormuzd A.
Demarco, Maria
Wiser, Amy L.
Perkins, Rebecca B.
Guido, Richard S.
Wentzensen, Nicolas
Schiffman, Mark
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title_full 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title_fullStr 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title_full_unstemmed 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title_short 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation
title_sort 2019 asccp risk-based management consensus guidelines: methods for risk estimation, recommended management, and validation
topic Risk Based Guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000528
work_keys_str_mv AT cheunglic 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT egemendidem 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT chenxiaojian 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT katkihormuzda 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT demarcomaria 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT wiseramyl 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT perkinsrebeccab 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT guidorichards 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT wentzensennicolas 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation
AT schiffmanmark 2019asccpriskbasedmanagementconsensusguidelinesmethodsforriskestimationrecommendedmanagementandvalidation