Cargando…
Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors
One of the major issues in microfluidic biosensors is biolayer deposition. Typical manufacturing processes, such as firing of ceramics and anodic bonding of silicon and glass, involve exposure to high temperatures, which any biomaterial is very vulnerable to. Therefore, current methods are based on...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061745 |
_version_ | 1783520445037805568 |
---|---|
author | Nawrot, Witold Malecha, Karol |
author_facet | Nawrot, Witold Malecha, Karol |
author_sort | Nawrot, Witold |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the major issues in microfluidic biosensors is biolayer deposition. Typical manufacturing processes, such as firing of ceramics and anodic bonding of silicon and glass, involve exposure to high temperatures, which any biomaterial is very vulnerable to. Therefore, current methods are based on deposition from liquid, for example, chemical bath deposition (CBD) and electrodeposition (ED). However, such approaches are not suitable for many biomaterials. This problem was partially resolved by introduction of ceramic–polymer bonding using plasma treatment. This method introduces an approximately 15-min-long window for biomodification between plasma activation and sealing the system with a polymer cap. Unfortunately, some biochemical processes are rather slow, and this time is not sufficient for the proper attachment of a biomaterial to the surface. Therefore, a novel method, based on plasma activation after biomodification, is introduced. Crucially, the discharge occurs selectively; otherwise, it would etch the biomaterial. Difficulties in manufacturing ceramic biosensors could be overcome by selective surface modification using plasma treatment and bonding to polymer. The area of plasma modification was investigated through contact-angle measurements and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analyses. A sample structure was manufactured in order to prove the concept. The results show that the method is viable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7147599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71475992020-04-20 Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors Nawrot, Witold Malecha, Karol Sensors (Basel) Article One of the major issues in microfluidic biosensors is biolayer deposition. Typical manufacturing processes, such as firing of ceramics and anodic bonding of silicon and glass, involve exposure to high temperatures, which any biomaterial is very vulnerable to. Therefore, current methods are based on deposition from liquid, for example, chemical bath deposition (CBD) and electrodeposition (ED). However, such approaches are not suitable for many biomaterials. This problem was partially resolved by introduction of ceramic–polymer bonding using plasma treatment. This method introduces an approximately 15-min-long window for biomodification between plasma activation and sealing the system with a polymer cap. Unfortunately, some biochemical processes are rather slow, and this time is not sufficient for the proper attachment of a biomaterial to the surface. Therefore, a novel method, based on plasma activation after biomodification, is introduced. Crucially, the discharge occurs selectively; otherwise, it would etch the biomaterial. Difficulties in manufacturing ceramic biosensors could be overcome by selective surface modification using plasma treatment and bonding to polymer. The area of plasma modification was investigated through contact-angle measurements and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analyses. A sample structure was manufactured in order to prove the concept. The results show that the method is viable. MDPI 2020-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7147599/ /pubmed/32245163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061745 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nawrot, Witold Malecha, Karol Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title | Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title_full | Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title_fullStr | Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title_short | Biomaterial Embedding Process for Ceramic–Polymer Microfluidic Sensors |
title_sort | biomaterial embedding process for ceramic–polymer microfluidic sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20061745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nawrotwitold biomaterialembeddingprocessforceramicpolymermicrofluidicsensors AT malechakarol biomaterialembeddingprocessforceramicpolymermicrofluidicsensors |