Antifungal drug susceptibility, molecular basis of resistance to echinocandins and molecular epidemiology of fluconazole resistance among clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Kuwait

Candida glabrata readily develops resistance to echinocandins. Identification, antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) and resistance mechanism to echinocandins among C. glabrata was determined in Kuwait. C. glabrata isolates (n = 75) were tested by Vitek2, multiplex PCR and/or PCR-sequencing of rDNA. AST to fluconazole, caspofungin, micafungin and amphotericin B was determined by Etest and to micafungin by broth microdilution (BMD). Mutations in hotspot-1/hotspot-2 of FKS1/FKS2 and ERG11 were detected by PCR-sequencing. All isolates were identified as C. glabrata sensu stricto. Seventy isolates were susceptible and five were resistant to micafungin by Etest and BMD (essential agreement, 93%; categorical agreement, 100%). Three micafungin-resistant isolates were resistant and two were susceptible dose-dependent to caspofungin. Four and one micafungin-resistant isolate contained S663P and ∆659 F mutation, respectively, in hotspot-1 of FKS2. Micafungin-resistant isolates were genotypically distinct strains. Only one of 36 fluconazole-resistant isolate contained nonsynonymous ERG11 mutations. Thirty-four of 36 fluconazole-resistant isolates were genotypically distinct strains. Our data show that micafungin susceptibility reliably identifies echinocandin-resistant isolates and may serve as a surrogate marker for predicting susceptibility/resistance of C. glabrata to caspofungin. All micafungin-resistant isolates also harbored a nonsynonymous/deletion mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS2. Fingerprinting data showed that echinocandin/fluconazole resistance development in C. glabrata is not clonal.