Cargando…
The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7148478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110 |
_version_ | 1783520601781043200 |
---|---|
author | Papi, Piero Di Murro, Bianca Tromba, Marco Passarelli, Pier Carmine D’Addona, Antonio Pompa, Giorgio |
author_facet | Papi, Piero Di Murro, Bianca Tromba, Marco Passarelli, Pier Carmine D’Addona, Antonio Pompa, Giorgio |
author_sort | Papi, Piero |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7148478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71484782020-04-21 The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study Papi, Piero Di Murro, Bianca Tromba, Marco Passarelli, Pier Carmine D’Addona, Antonio Pompa, Giorgio Antibiotics (Basel) Article The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial. MDPI 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7148478/ /pubmed/32138241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Papi, Piero Di Murro, Bianca Tromba, Marco Passarelli, Pier Carmine D’Addona, Antonio Pompa, Giorgio The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title | The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full | The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title_short | The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | use of a non-absorbable membrane as an occlusive barrier for alveolar ridge preservation: a one year follow-up prospective cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7148478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papipiero theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT dimurrobianca theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT trombamarco theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT passarellipiercarmine theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT daddonaantonio theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT pompagiorgio theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT papipiero useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT dimurrobianca useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT trombamarco useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT passarellipiercarmine useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT daddonaantonio useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy AT pompagiorgio useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy |