Cargando…

The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study

The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papi, Piero, Di Murro, Bianca, Tromba, Marco, Passarelli, Pier Carmine, D’Addona, Antonio, Pompa, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7148478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110
_version_ 1783520601781043200
author Papi, Piero
Di Murro, Bianca
Tromba, Marco
Passarelli, Pier Carmine
D’Addona, Antonio
Pompa, Giorgio
author_facet Papi, Piero
Di Murro, Bianca
Tromba, Marco
Passarelli, Pier Carmine
D’Addona, Antonio
Pompa, Giorgio
author_sort Papi, Piero
collection PubMed
description The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7148478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71484782020-04-21 The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study Papi, Piero Di Murro, Bianca Tromba, Marco Passarelli, Pier Carmine D’Addona, Antonio Pompa, Giorgio Antibiotics (Basel) Article The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem(®), botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial. MDPI 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7148478/ /pubmed/32138241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papi, Piero
Di Murro, Bianca
Tromba, Marco
Passarelli, Pier Carmine
D’Addona, Antonio
Pompa, Giorgio
The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title_full The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title_short The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort use of a non-absorbable membrane as an occlusive barrier for alveolar ridge preservation: a one year follow-up prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7148478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030110
work_keys_str_mv AT papipiero theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT dimurrobianca theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT trombamarco theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT passarellipiercarmine theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT daddonaantonio theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT pompagiorgio theuseofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT papipiero useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT dimurrobianca useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT trombamarco useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT passarellipiercarmine useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT daddonaantonio useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy
AT pompagiorgio useofanonabsorbablemembraneasanocclusivebarrierforalveolarridgepreservationaoneyearfollowupprospectivecohortstudy