Cargando…

Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state

Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and jus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, David, Soifer, Eldon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7149037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9612-7
_version_ 1783520727362699264
author Elliott, David
Soifer, Eldon
author_facet Elliott, David
Soifer, Eldon
author_sort Elliott, David
collection PubMed
description Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and justification for this infringement. We also argue that this defense is extensible to human social and political contexts; it provides the vital elements of a theory of just privacy infringement. This theory is broadly compatible both with major forms of political theory (except anarchistic ones) and with the main conceptions of privacy defended in recent philosophical and jurisprudential literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7149037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71490372020-04-13 Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state Elliott, David Soifer, Eldon International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Article Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and justification for this infringement. We also argue that this defense is extensible to human social and political contexts; it provides the vital elements of a theory of just privacy infringement. This theory is broadly compatible both with major forms of political theory (except anarchistic ones) and with the main conceptions of privacy defended in recent philosophical and jurisprudential literature. Springer Netherlands 2017-02-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7149037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9612-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Elliott, David
Soifer, Eldon
Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title_full Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title_fullStr Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title_full_unstemmed Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title_short Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
title_sort divine omniscience, privacy, and the state
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7149037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9612-7
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottdavid divineomniscienceprivacyandthestate
AT soifereldon divineomniscienceprivacyandthestate