Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308334 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19 |
_version_ | 1783521054559305728 |
---|---|
author | Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan |
author_facet | Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan |
author_sort | Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determined and roots were divided into two groups of 20 samples each: Group I - SAF and Group II - WO. All root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The roots were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic examination. The amount of debris and smear layer was evaluated using five score index at coronal, middle and apical third levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and significance was set at a P < 0.05. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in cleaning the apical third. Group I (SAF) showed better canal cleanliness compared to Group II (WO) in the apical third. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, SAF in combination with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA irrigating solution had significantly better cleaning efficacy in the apical third of root canals when compared to WO rotary file system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7150549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71505492020-04-17 Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determined and roots were divided into two groups of 20 samples each: Group I - SAF and Group II - WO. All root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The roots were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic examination. The amount of debris and smear layer was evaluated using five score index at coronal, middle and apical third levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and significance was set at a P < 0.05. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in cleaning the apical third. Group I (SAF) showed better canal cleanliness compared to Group II (WO) in the apical third. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, SAF in combination with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA irrigating solution had significantly better cleaning efficacy in the apical third of root canals when compared to WO rotary file system. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7150549/ /pubmed/32308334 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and waveone file: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308334 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakthavatchalambalakrishnan comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT ranjanimuthukrishnansudharshana comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT amudhalakshmikrishnan comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy |