Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan, Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana, Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308334
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19
_version_ 1783521054559305728
author Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan
Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana
Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan
author_facet Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan
Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana
Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan
author_sort Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determined and roots were divided into two groups of 20 samples each: Group I - SAF and Group II - WO. All root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The roots were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic examination. The amount of debris and smear layer was evaluated using five score index at coronal, middle and apical third levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and significance was set at a P < 0.05. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in cleaning the apical third. Group I (SAF) showed better canal cleanliness compared to Group II (WO) in the apical third. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, SAF in combination with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA irrigating solution had significantly better cleaning efficacy in the apical third of root canals when compared to WO rotary file system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7150549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71505492020-04-17 Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: This study aims to compare the cleaning efficacy of root canal walls using two rotary single file systems: self-adjusting file (SAF) and WaveOne (WO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human premolars with similar range of canal curvature were selected, decoronated, working length determined and roots were divided into two groups of 20 samples each: Group I - SAF and Group II - WO. All root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The roots were sectioned longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic examination. The amount of debris and smear layer was evaluated using five score index at coronal, middle and apical third levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and significance was set at a P < 0.05. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in cleaning the apical third. Group I (SAF) showed better canal cleanliness compared to Group II (WO) in the apical third. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, SAF in combination with 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA irrigating solution had significantly better cleaning efficacy in the apical third of root canals when compared to WO rotary file system. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7150549/ /pubmed/32308334 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bakthavatchalam, Balakrishnan
Ranjani, Muthukrishnan Sudharshana
Amudhalakshmi, Krishnan
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and waveone file: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308334
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_160_19
work_keys_str_mv AT bakthavatchalambalakrishnan comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT ranjanimuthukrishnansudharshana comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT amudhalakshmikrishnan comparativeevaluationofcleaningefficacyofselfadjustingfileandwaveonefileaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopicstudy