Cargando…

Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Jaime L, Anderson, Rob, Shields, Beverley, King, Sophie, Hudson, Michelle, Shepherd, Maggie, McDonald, Timothy James, Pearson, Ewan, Hattersley, Andrew, Hyde, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716
_version_ 1783521064546992128
author Peters, Jaime L
Anderson, Rob
Shields, Beverley
King, Sophie
Hudson, Michelle
Shepherd, Maggie
McDonald, Timothy James
Pearson, Ewan
Hattersley, Andrew
Hyde, Chris
author_facet Peters, Jaime L
Anderson, Rob
Shields, Beverley
King, Sophie
Hudson, Michelle
Shepherd, Maggie
McDonald, Timothy James
Pearson, Ewan
Hattersley, Andrew
Hyde, Chris
author_sort Peters, Jaime L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales was developed and analysed. The model was informed by the literature, routinely collected data and a clinical study conducted in parallel with the modelling. SETTING: Secondary care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Simulations based on characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetes <30 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Four test-treatment strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes in a prevalent cohort of diabetics diagnosed under the age of 30 years were modelled: clinician-based genetic test referral, targeted genetic testing based on clinical prediction models, targeted genetic testing based on biomarkers, and blanket genetic testing. The results of the test-treatment strategies were compared with a strategy of no genetic testing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted lifetime costs, proportion of cases of monogenic diabetes identified. RESULTS: Based on current evidence, strategies using clinical characteristics or biomarkers were estimated to save approximately £100–£200 per person with diabetes over a lifetime compared with no testing. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prevalence of monogenic diabetes, the uptake of testing, and the frequency of home blood glucose monitoring had the largest impact on the results (ranging from savings of £400–£50 per person), but did not change the overall findings. The model is limited by many model inputs being based on very few individuals, and some long-term data informed by clinical opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to the NHS could be saved with targeted genetic testing based on clinical characteristics or biomarkers. More research should focus on the economic case for the use of such strategies closer to the time of diabetes diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01238380.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7150598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71505982020-04-18 Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation Peters, Jaime L Anderson, Rob Shields, Beverley King, Sophie Hudson, Michelle Shepherd, Maggie McDonald, Timothy James Pearson, Ewan Hattersley, Andrew Hyde, Chris BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales was developed and analysed. The model was informed by the literature, routinely collected data and a clinical study conducted in parallel with the modelling. SETTING: Secondary care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Simulations based on characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetes <30 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Four test-treatment strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes in a prevalent cohort of diabetics diagnosed under the age of 30 years were modelled: clinician-based genetic test referral, targeted genetic testing based on clinical prediction models, targeted genetic testing based on biomarkers, and blanket genetic testing. The results of the test-treatment strategies were compared with a strategy of no genetic testing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted lifetime costs, proportion of cases of monogenic diabetes identified. RESULTS: Based on current evidence, strategies using clinical characteristics or biomarkers were estimated to save approximately £100–£200 per person with diabetes over a lifetime compared with no testing. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prevalence of monogenic diabetes, the uptake of testing, and the frequency of home blood glucose monitoring had the largest impact on the results (ranging from savings of £400–£50 per person), but did not change the overall findings. The model is limited by many model inputs being based on very few individuals, and some long-term data informed by clinical opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to the NHS could be saved with targeted genetic testing based on clinical characteristics or biomarkers. More research should focus on the economic case for the use of such strategies closer to the time of diabetes diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01238380. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7150598/ /pubmed/32193268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Peters, Jaime L
Anderson, Rob
Shields, Beverley
King, Sophie
Hudson, Michelle
Shepherd, Maggie
McDonald, Timothy James
Pearson, Ewan
Hattersley, Andrew
Hyde, Chris
Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title_full Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title_fullStr Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title_short Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
title_sort strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716
work_keys_str_mv AT petersjaimel strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT andersonrob strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT shieldsbeverley strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT kingsophie strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT hudsonmichelle strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT shepherdmaggie strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT mcdonaldtimothyjames strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT pearsonewan strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT hattersleyandrew strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation
AT hydechris strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation