Cargando…
Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716 |
_version_ | 1783521064546992128 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Jaime L Anderson, Rob Shields, Beverley King, Sophie Hudson, Michelle Shepherd, Maggie McDonald, Timothy James Pearson, Ewan Hattersley, Andrew Hyde, Chris |
author_facet | Peters, Jaime L Anderson, Rob Shields, Beverley King, Sophie Hudson, Michelle Shepherd, Maggie McDonald, Timothy James Pearson, Ewan Hattersley, Andrew Hyde, Chris |
author_sort | Peters, Jaime L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales was developed and analysed. The model was informed by the literature, routinely collected data and a clinical study conducted in parallel with the modelling. SETTING: Secondary care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Simulations based on characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetes <30 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Four test-treatment strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes in a prevalent cohort of diabetics diagnosed under the age of 30 years were modelled: clinician-based genetic test referral, targeted genetic testing based on clinical prediction models, targeted genetic testing based on biomarkers, and blanket genetic testing. The results of the test-treatment strategies were compared with a strategy of no genetic testing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted lifetime costs, proportion of cases of monogenic diabetes identified. RESULTS: Based on current evidence, strategies using clinical characteristics or biomarkers were estimated to save approximately £100–£200 per person with diabetes over a lifetime compared with no testing. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prevalence of monogenic diabetes, the uptake of testing, and the frequency of home blood glucose monitoring had the largest impact on the results (ranging from savings of £400–£50 per person), but did not change the overall findings. The model is limited by many model inputs being based on very few individuals, and some long-term data informed by clinical opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to the NHS could be saved with targeted genetic testing based on clinical characteristics or biomarkers. More research should focus on the economic case for the use of such strategies closer to the time of diabetes diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01238380. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7150598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71505982020-04-18 Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation Peters, Jaime L Anderson, Rob Shields, Beverley King, Sophie Hudson, Michelle Shepherd, Maggie McDonald, Timothy James Pearson, Ewan Hattersley, Andrew Hyde, Chris BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the lifetime costs associated with strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes and change their treatment to more appropriate therapy. DESIGN: A decision analytical model from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales was developed and analysed. The model was informed by the literature, routinely collected data and a clinical study conducted in parallel with the modelling. SETTING: Secondary care in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Simulations based on characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetes <30 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Four test-treatment strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes in a prevalent cohort of diabetics diagnosed under the age of 30 years were modelled: clinician-based genetic test referral, targeted genetic testing based on clinical prediction models, targeted genetic testing based on biomarkers, and blanket genetic testing. The results of the test-treatment strategies were compared with a strategy of no genetic testing. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted lifetime costs, proportion of cases of monogenic diabetes identified. RESULTS: Based on current evidence, strategies using clinical characteristics or biomarkers were estimated to save approximately £100–£200 per person with diabetes over a lifetime compared with no testing. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prevalence of monogenic diabetes, the uptake of testing, and the frequency of home blood glucose monitoring had the largest impact on the results (ranging from savings of £400–£50 per person), but did not change the overall findings. The model is limited by many model inputs being based on very few individuals, and some long-term data informed by clinical opinion. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to the NHS could be saved with targeted genetic testing based on clinical characteristics or biomarkers. More research should focus on the economic case for the use of such strategies closer to the time of diabetes diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01238380. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7150598/ /pubmed/32193268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology Peters, Jaime L Anderson, Rob Shields, Beverley King, Sophie Hudson, Michelle Shepherd, Maggie McDonald, Timothy James Pearson, Ewan Hattersley, Andrew Hyde, Chris Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title | Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title_full | Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title_fullStr | Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title_short | Strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
title_sort | strategies to identify individuals with monogenic diabetes: results of an economic evaluation |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersjaimel strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT andersonrob strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT shieldsbeverley strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT kingsophie strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT hudsonmichelle strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT shepherdmaggie strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT mcdonaldtimothyjames strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT pearsonewan strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT hattersleyandrew strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation AT hydechris strategiestoidentifyindividualswithmonogenicdiabetesresultsofaneconomicevaluation |