Cargando…
Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randoml...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055 |
_version_ | 1783521208948490240 |
---|---|
author | Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir Kahramanoglu, Erkut Ay, Mustafa Kuru, Leyla Agrali, Omer Birkan |
author_facet | Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir Kahramanoglu, Erkut Ay, Mustafa Kuru, Leyla Agrali, Omer Birkan |
author_sort | Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randomly assigned into eight groups according to the applied scaler type (Ma = Magnetostrictive, Pi = Piezoelectric), degree of power (M = Medium, F = Full), and angulation (0° and 45°). In the second stage, the specimens (n = 40) were further divided into two groups according to the applied polishing device (nylon bristle brush or rubber prophy cup). Laser scanner and contact profilometer devices were used for the surface analysis. Both ultrasonic instruments tested in our study produced rougher surfaces when full power was used at a 0° angle (p < 0.01). The highest wear (0.82 ± 0.07 mm(3)) and roughness values (0.30 ± 0.01 µm) were detected in the PiF0 group. Polishing performed with a rubber prophy cup resulted in almost twice the wear as well as a smoother surface when compared to polishing performed with a nylon bristle brush (p < 0.001). Variations in the application parameters of ultrasonic scalers and the type of polishing instrument might lead to significantly different root-surface characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7151259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71512592020-04-20 Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir Kahramanoglu, Erkut Ay, Mustafa Kuru, Leyla Agrali, Omer Birkan Healthcare (Basel) Article The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randomly assigned into eight groups according to the applied scaler type (Ma = Magnetostrictive, Pi = Piezoelectric), degree of power (M = Medium, F = Full), and angulation (0° and 45°). In the second stage, the specimens (n = 40) were further divided into two groups according to the applied polishing device (nylon bristle brush or rubber prophy cup). Laser scanner and contact profilometer devices were used for the surface analysis. Both ultrasonic instruments tested in our study produced rougher surfaces when full power was used at a 0° angle (p < 0.01). The highest wear (0.82 ± 0.07 mm(3)) and roughness values (0.30 ± 0.01 µm) were detected in the PiF0 group. Polishing performed with a rubber prophy cup resulted in almost twice the wear as well as a smoother surface when compared to polishing performed with a nylon bristle brush (p < 0.001). Variations in the application parameters of ultrasonic scalers and the type of polishing instrument might lead to significantly different root-surface characteristics. MDPI 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7151259/ /pubmed/32155974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir Kahramanoglu, Erkut Ay, Mustafa Kuru, Leyla Agrali, Omer Birkan Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title | Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of root surface wear and roughness resulted from different ultrasonic scalers and polishing devices applied on human teeth: an in-vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahiroglumuhammedbedir comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy AT kahramanogluerkut comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy AT aymustafa comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy AT kuruleyla comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy AT agraliomerbirkan comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy |