Cargando…

Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study

The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randoml...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir, Kahramanoglu, Erkut, Ay, Mustafa, Kuru, Leyla, Agrali, Omer Birkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055
_version_ 1783521208948490240
author Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir
Kahramanoglu, Erkut
Ay, Mustafa
Kuru, Leyla
Agrali, Omer Birkan
author_facet Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir
Kahramanoglu, Erkut
Ay, Mustafa
Kuru, Leyla
Agrali, Omer Birkan
author_sort Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randomly assigned into eight groups according to the applied scaler type (Ma = Magnetostrictive, Pi = Piezoelectric), degree of power (M = Medium, F = Full), and angulation (0° and 45°). In the second stage, the specimens (n = 40) were further divided into two groups according to the applied polishing device (nylon bristle brush or rubber prophy cup). Laser scanner and contact profilometer devices were used for the surface analysis. Both ultrasonic instruments tested in our study produced rougher surfaces when full power was used at a 0° angle (p < 0.01). The highest wear (0.82 ± 0.07 mm(3)) and roughness values (0.30 ± 0.01 µm) were detected in the PiF0 group. Polishing performed with a rubber prophy cup resulted in almost twice the wear as well as a smoother surface when compared to polishing performed with a nylon bristle brush (p < 0.001). Variations in the application parameters of ultrasonic scalers and the type of polishing instrument might lead to significantly different root-surface characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7151259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71512592020-04-20 Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir Kahramanoglu, Erkut Ay, Mustafa Kuru, Leyla Agrali, Omer Birkan Healthcare (Basel) Article The aim of the present study was to compare the root surface wear and roughness, resulted from the professional dental hygiene instruments, including ultrasonic dental scalers, rubber prophy cups, and nylon bristle brushes, on the extracted human mandibular incisor teeth. Teeth (n = 80) were randomly assigned into eight groups according to the applied scaler type (Ma = Magnetostrictive, Pi = Piezoelectric), degree of power (M = Medium, F = Full), and angulation (0° and 45°). In the second stage, the specimens (n = 40) were further divided into two groups according to the applied polishing device (nylon bristle brush or rubber prophy cup). Laser scanner and contact profilometer devices were used for the surface analysis. Both ultrasonic instruments tested in our study produced rougher surfaces when full power was used at a 0° angle (p < 0.01). The highest wear (0.82 ± 0.07 mm(3)) and roughness values (0.30 ± 0.01 µm) were detected in the PiF0 group. Polishing performed with a rubber prophy cup resulted in almost twice the wear as well as a smoother surface when compared to polishing performed with a nylon bristle brush (p < 0.001). Variations in the application parameters of ultrasonic scalers and the type of polishing instrument might lead to significantly different root-surface characteristics. MDPI 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7151259/ /pubmed/32155974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mahiroglu, Muhammed Bedir
Kahramanoglu, Erkut
Ay, Mustafa
Kuru, Leyla
Agrali, Omer Birkan
Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of root surface wear and roughness resulted from different ultrasonic scalers and polishing devices applied on human teeth: an in-vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010055
work_keys_str_mv AT mahiroglumuhammedbedir comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy
AT kahramanogluerkut comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy
AT aymustafa comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy
AT kuruleyla comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy
AT agraliomerbirkan comparisonofrootsurfacewearandroughnessresultedfromdifferentultrasonicscalersandpolishingdevicesappliedonhumanteethaninvitrostudy