Cargando…

Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?

Left atrial structural, functional and electrical remodelling are linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology and mirror the phrase “AF begets AF”. A structurally remodelled left atrium (LA) is fibrotic, dysfunctional and enlarged. Fibrosis is the hallmark of LA structural remodelling and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Floria, Mariana, Radu, Smaranda, Gosav, Evelina Maria, Cozma, Dragos, Mitu, Ovidiu, Ouatu, Anca, Tanase, Daniela Maria, Scripcariu, Viorel, Serban, Lacramioara Ionela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030137
_version_ 1783521245206151168
author Floria, Mariana
Radu, Smaranda
Gosav, Evelina Maria
Cozma, Dragos
Mitu, Ovidiu
Ouatu, Anca
Tanase, Daniela Maria
Scripcariu, Viorel
Serban, Lacramioara Ionela
author_facet Floria, Mariana
Radu, Smaranda
Gosav, Evelina Maria
Cozma, Dragos
Mitu, Ovidiu
Ouatu, Anca
Tanase, Daniela Maria
Scripcariu, Viorel
Serban, Lacramioara Ionela
author_sort Floria, Mariana
collection PubMed
description Left atrial structural, functional and electrical remodelling are linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology and mirror the phrase “AF begets AF”. A structurally remodelled left atrium (LA) is fibrotic, dysfunctional and enlarged. Fibrosis is the hallmark of LA structural remodelling and is associated with increased risk of stroke, heart failure development and/or progression and poorer catheter ablation outcomes with increased recurrence rates. Moreover, increased atrial fibrosis has been associated with higher rates of stroke even in sinus-rhythm individuals. As such, properly assessing the fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy in AF patients becomes necessary. In this respect, late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging is the gold standard in imaging myocardial fibrosis. LA structural remodelling extension offers both diagnostic and prognostic information and influences therapeutic choices. LGE-CMR scans can be used before the procedure to better select candidates and to aid in choosing the ablation technique, during the procedure (full CMR-guided ablations) and after the ablation (to assess the ablation scar). This review focuses on imaging several LA structural remodelling CMR parameters, including size, shape and fibrosis (both extension and architecture) and their impact on procedure outcomes, recurrence risk, as well as their utility in relation to the index procedure timing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7151417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71514172020-04-20 Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR? Floria, Mariana Radu, Smaranda Gosav, Evelina Maria Cozma, Dragos Mitu, Ovidiu Ouatu, Anca Tanase, Daniela Maria Scripcariu, Viorel Serban, Lacramioara Ionela Diagnostics (Basel) Review Left atrial structural, functional and electrical remodelling are linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) pathophysiology and mirror the phrase “AF begets AF”. A structurally remodelled left atrium (LA) is fibrotic, dysfunctional and enlarged. Fibrosis is the hallmark of LA structural remodelling and is associated with increased risk of stroke, heart failure development and/or progression and poorer catheter ablation outcomes with increased recurrence rates. Moreover, increased atrial fibrosis has been associated with higher rates of stroke even in sinus-rhythm individuals. As such, properly assessing the fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy in AF patients becomes necessary. In this respect, late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging is the gold standard in imaging myocardial fibrosis. LA structural remodelling extension offers both diagnostic and prognostic information and influences therapeutic choices. LGE-CMR scans can be used before the procedure to better select candidates and to aid in choosing the ablation technique, during the procedure (full CMR-guided ablations) and after the ablation (to assess the ablation scar). This review focuses on imaging several LA structural remodelling CMR parameters, including size, shape and fibrosis (both extension and architecture) and their impact on procedure outcomes, recurrence risk, as well as their utility in relation to the index procedure timing. MDPI 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7151417/ /pubmed/32131455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030137 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Floria, Mariana
Radu, Smaranda
Gosav, Evelina Maria
Cozma, Dragos
Mitu, Ovidiu
Ouatu, Anca
Tanase, Daniela Maria
Scripcariu, Viorel
Serban, Lacramioara Ionela
Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title_full Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title_fullStr Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title_full_unstemmed Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title_short Left Atrial Structural Remodelling in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learnt from CMR?
title_sort left atrial structural remodelling in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: what have we learnt from cmr?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7151417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030137
work_keys_str_mv AT floriamariana leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT radusmaranda leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT gosavevelinamaria leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT cozmadragos leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT mituovidiu leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT ouatuanca leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT tanasedanielamaria leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT scripcariuviorel leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr
AT serbanlacramioaraionela leftatrialstructuralremodellinginnonvalvularatrialfibrillationwhathavewelearntfromcmr