Cargando…

Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database

BACKGROUND: Observational studies using large claims databases for diabetes patients have been increasingly conducted. While validation of outcomes is important in such studies, validation studies from Japan are still scarce and small in scale with questions remaining on the representativeness of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ono, Yasuhisa, Taneda, Yusuke, Takeshima, Tomomi, Iwasaki, Kosuke, Yasui, Atsutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308492
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S245555
_version_ 1783521503382339584
author Ono, Yasuhisa
Taneda, Yusuke
Takeshima, Tomomi
Iwasaki, Kosuke
Yasui, Atsutaka
author_facet Ono, Yasuhisa
Taneda, Yusuke
Takeshima, Tomomi
Iwasaki, Kosuke
Yasui, Atsutaka
author_sort Ono, Yasuhisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observational studies using large claims databases for diabetes patients have been increasingly conducted. While validation of outcomes is important in such studies, validation studies from Japan are still scarce and small in scale with questions remaining on the representativeness of their findings. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of outcomes that often develop in type 2 diabetes patients: cardiovascular outcomes including congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke-related diseases, and renal outcomes including end stage renal disease (ESRD), and death using a large Japanese database containing administrative claims and electronic medical record (EMR) data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used patient-level administrative claims data from 2003 and EMR data from 1985 to the most recent data up to December 2018 provided by Real World Data Co., Ltd. The database consisted of data from over 200 hospitals including ≥12 million uniquely identifiable patients. Among patients who had ≥1 type 2 diabetes diagnosis in the EMR, those who had administrative claims for each outcome were identified, and then the PPV was calculated for each outcome using the EMR as the gold standard. RESULTS: The numbers of patients identified for each outcome were 1,700 for MI, 2,027 for hemorrhagic stroke, 3,722 for ESRD, 4,723 for ischemic stroke, 5,404 for CHF, 6,678 for any type of stroke, and 10,815 for death. PPVs ranged from 67.4% for ESRD, 78.7% for MI, 80.3% for death, 85.7% for ischemic stroke, 88.9% for any type of stroke, 89.9% for hemorrhagic stroke, and 95.7% for CHF. A post hoc analysis showed PPV for ESRD as 83.8%. CONCLUSION: This large-scale validation study on diagnosis in administrative claims showed reasonable PPVs for the outcomes. We believe that the definitions of outcomes can be considered to be appropriate for future studies using Japanese administrative claims data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7152547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71525472020-04-17 Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database Ono, Yasuhisa Taneda, Yusuke Takeshima, Tomomi Iwasaki, Kosuke Yasui, Atsutaka Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Observational studies using large claims databases for diabetes patients have been increasingly conducted. While validation of outcomes is important in such studies, validation studies from Japan are still scarce and small in scale with questions remaining on the representativeness of their findings. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of outcomes that often develop in type 2 diabetes patients: cardiovascular outcomes including congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke-related diseases, and renal outcomes including end stage renal disease (ESRD), and death using a large Japanese database containing administrative claims and electronic medical record (EMR) data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used patient-level administrative claims data from 2003 and EMR data from 1985 to the most recent data up to December 2018 provided by Real World Data Co., Ltd. The database consisted of data from over 200 hospitals including ≥12 million uniquely identifiable patients. Among patients who had ≥1 type 2 diabetes diagnosis in the EMR, those who had administrative claims for each outcome were identified, and then the PPV was calculated for each outcome using the EMR as the gold standard. RESULTS: The numbers of patients identified for each outcome were 1,700 for MI, 2,027 for hemorrhagic stroke, 3,722 for ESRD, 4,723 for ischemic stroke, 5,404 for CHF, 6,678 for any type of stroke, and 10,815 for death. PPVs ranged from 67.4% for ESRD, 78.7% for MI, 80.3% for death, 85.7% for ischemic stroke, 88.9% for any type of stroke, 89.9% for hemorrhagic stroke, and 95.7% for CHF. A post hoc analysis showed PPV for ESRD as 83.8%. CONCLUSION: This large-scale validation study on diagnosis in administrative claims showed reasonable PPVs for the outcomes. We believe that the definitions of outcomes can be considered to be appropriate for future studies using Japanese administrative claims data. Dove 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7152547/ /pubmed/32308492 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S245555 Text en © 2020 Ono et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ono, Yasuhisa
Taneda, Yusuke
Takeshima, Tomomi
Iwasaki, Kosuke
Yasui, Atsutaka
Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title_full Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title_fullStr Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title_short Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database
title_sort validity of claims diagnosis codes for cardiovascular diseases in diabetes patients in japanese administrative database
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308492
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S245555
work_keys_str_mv AT onoyasuhisa validityofclaimsdiagnosiscodesforcardiovasculardiseasesindiabetespatientsinjapaneseadministrativedatabase
AT tanedayusuke validityofclaimsdiagnosiscodesforcardiovasculardiseasesindiabetespatientsinjapaneseadministrativedatabase
AT takeshimatomomi validityofclaimsdiagnosiscodesforcardiovasculardiseasesindiabetespatientsinjapaneseadministrativedatabase
AT iwasakikosuke validityofclaimsdiagnosiscodesforcardiovasculardiseasesindiabetespatientsinjapaneseadministrativedatabase
AT yasuiatsutaka validityofclaimsdiagnosiscodesforcardiovasculardiseasesindiabetespatientsinjapaneseadministrativedatabase