Cargando…

Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15

Health systems resilience (HSR) is defined as the ability of a health system to continue providing normal services in response to a crisis, making it a critical concept for analysis of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS). However, no consensus for this definition exists a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odhiambo, Jackline, Jeffery, Caroline, Lako, Richard, Devkota, Baburam, Valadez, Joseph J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz160
_version_ 1783521540559601664
author Odhiambo, Jackline
Jeffery, Caroline
Lako, Richard
Devkota, Baburam
Valadez, Joseph J
author_facet Odhiambo, Jackline
Jeffery, Caroline
Lako, Richard
Devkota, Baburam
Valadez, Joseph J
author_sort Odhiambo, Jackline
collection PubMed
description Health systems resilience (HSR) is defined as the ability of a health system to continue providing normal services in response to a crisis, making it a critical concept for analysis of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS). However, no consensus for this definition exists and even less about how to measure HSR. We examine three current HSR definitions (maintaining function, improving function and achieving health system targets) using real-time data from South Sudan to develop a data-driven understanding of resilience. We used 14 maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) coverage indicators from household surveys in South Sudan collected at independence (2011) and following 2 years of protracted conflict (2015), to construct a resilience index (RI) for 9 of the former 10 states and nationally. We also assessed health system stress using conflict-related indicators and developed a stress index. We cross tabulated the two indices to assess the relationship of resilience and stress. For maintaining function for 80% of MNCH indicators, seven state health systems were resilient, compared with improving function for 50% of the indicators (two states were resilient). Achieving the health system national target of 50% coverage in half of the MNCH indicators displayed no resilience. MNCH coverage levels were low, with state averages ranging between 15% and 44%. Central Equatoria State displayed high resilience and high system stress. Lakes and Northern Bahr el Ghazal displayed high resilience and low stress. Jonglei and Upper Nile States had low resilience and high stress. This study is the first to investigate HSR definitions using a resilience metric and to simultaneously measure health system stress in FCAS. Improving function is the HSR definition detecting the greatest variation in the RI. HSR and health system stress are not consistently negatively associated. HSR is highly complex warranting more in-depth analyses in FCAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7152724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71527242020-04-17 Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15 Odhiambo, Jackline Jeffery, Caroline Lako, Richard Devkota, Baburam Valadez, Joseph J Health Policy Plan Original Articles Health systems resilience (HSR) is defined as the ability of a health system to continue providing normal services in response to a crisis, making it a critical concept for analysis of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS). However, no consensus for this definition exists and even less about how to measure HSR. We examine three current HSR definitions (maintaining function, improving function and achieving health system targets) using real-time data from South Sudan to develop a data-driven understanding of resilience. We used 14 maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) coverage indicators from household surveys in South Sudan collected at independence (2011) and following 2 years of protracted conflict (2015), to construct a resilience index (RI) for 9 of the former 10 states and nationally. We also assessed health system stress using conflict-related indicators and developed a stress index. We cross tabulated the two indices to assess the relationship of resilience and stress. For maintaining function for 80% of MNCH indicators, seven state health systems were resilient, compared with improving function for 50% of the indicators (two states were resilient). Achieving the health system national target of 50% coverage in half of the MNCH indicators displayed no resilience. MNCH coverage levels were low, with state averages ranging between 15% and 44%. Central Equatoria State displayed high resilience and high system stress. Lakes and Northern Bahr el Ghazal displayed high resilience and low stress. Jonglei and Upper Nile States had low resilience and high stress. This study is the first to investigate HSR definitions using a resilience metric and to simultaneously measure health system stress in FCAS. Improving function is the HSR definition detecting the greatest variation in the RI. HSR and health system stress are not consistently negatively associated. HSR is highly complex warranting more in-depth analyses in FCAS. Oxford University Press 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7152724/ /pubmed/31876921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz160 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Odhiambo, Jackline
Jeffery, Caroline
Lako, Richard
Devkota, Baburam
Valadez, Joseph J
Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title_full Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title_fullStr Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title_full_unstemmed Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title_short Measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: South Sudan 2011–15
title_sort measuring health system resilience in a highly fragile nation during protracted conflict: south sudan 2011–15
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz160
work_keys_str_mv AT odhiambojackline measuringhealthsystemresilienceinahighlyfragilenationduringprotractedconflictsouthsudan201115
AT jefferycaroline measuringhealthsystemresilienceinahighlyfragilenationduringprotractedconflictsouthsudan201115
AT lakorichard measuringhealthsystemresilienceinahighlyfragilenationduringprotractedconflictsouthsudan201115
AT devkotababuram measuringhealthsystemresilienceinahighlyfragilenationduringprotractedconflictsouthsudan201115
AT valadezjosephj measuringhealthsystemresilienceinahighlyfragilenationduringprotractedconflictsouthsudan201115