Cargando…

Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chen, Cheng, He, Jin, Kaizhou, Fan, Zhiyao, Gong, Yitao, Qian, Yunzhen, Deng, Shengming, Huang, Qiuyi, Ni, Quanxing, Yu, Xianjun, Luo, Guopei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947
_version_ 1783521607413661696
author Liu, Chen
Cheng, He
Jin, Kaizhou
Fan, Zhiyao
Gong, Yitao
Qian, Yunzhen
Deng, Shengming
Huang, Qiuyi
Ni, Quanxing
Yu, Xianjun
Luo, Guopei
author_facet Liu, Chen
Cheng, He
Jin, Kaizhou
Fan, Zhiyao
Gong, Yitao
Qian, Yunzhen
Deng, Shengming
Huang, Qiuyi
Ni, Quanxing
Yu, Xianjun
Luo, Guopei
author_sort Liu, Chen
collection PubMed
description Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this study, patients who had undergone curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (612 cases) were included. The efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine-based regimen, stratified by nodal status (negative, positive) or N substage (N0, no nodal involvement; N1, 1-3-node involvement; N2, ≥4-node involvement), was examined. Both the node-negative (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87, P = .006) and node-positive subgroups (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.33-0.62, P < .001) benefited from gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with N0 (ie, the node-negative subgroup) or N1 (HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25-0.52, P < .001) disease benefited from gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. However, patients with N2 tumors (HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.50-1.78, P = .867) had poor response to gemcitabine-based treatment. Therefore, we postulate that resected pancreatic cancer with N2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A more intensive adjuvant regimen may be required for N2 subgroup patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7153189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71531892020-04-20 Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Liu, Chen Cheng, He Jin, Kaizhou Fan, Zhiyao Gong, Yitao Qian, Yunzhen Deng, Shengming Huang, Qiuyi Ni, Quanxing Yu, Xianjun Luo, Guopei Cancer Control Research Article Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this study, patients who had undergone curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (612 cases) were included. The efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine-based regimen, stratified by nodal status (negative, positive) or N substage (N0, no nodal involvement; N1, 1-3-node involvement; N2, ≥4-node involvement), was examined. Both the node-negative (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87, P = .006) and node-positive subgroups (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.33-0.62, P < .001) benefited from gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with N0 (ie, the node-negative subgroup) or N1 (HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25-0.52, P < .001) disease benefited from gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. However, patients with N2 tumors (HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.50-1.78, P = .867) had poor response to gemcitabine-based treatment. Therefore, we postulate that resected pancreatic cancer with N2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A more intensive adjuvant regimen may be required for N2 subgroup patients. SAGE Publications 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7153189/ /pubmed/32268796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Chen
Cheng, He
Jin, Kaizhou
Fan, Zhiyao
Gong, Yitao
Qian, Yunzhen
Deng, Shengming
Huang, Qiuyi
Ni, Quanxing
Yu, Xianjun
Luo, Guopei
Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort resected pancreatic cancer with n2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchen resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT chenghe resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT jinkaizhou resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT fanzhiyao resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT gongyitao resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT qianyunzhen resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT dengshengming resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT huangqiuyi resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT niquanxing resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yuxianjun resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy
AT luoguopei resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy