Cargando…
Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947 |
_version_ | 1783521607413661696 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Chen Cheng, He Jin, Kaizhou Fan, Zhiyao Gong, Yitao Qian, Yunzhen Deng, Shengming Huang, Qiuyi Ni, Quanxing Yu, Xianjun Luo, Guopei |
author_facet | Liu, Chen Cheng, He Jin, Kaizhou Fan, Zhiyao Gong, Yitao Qian, Yunzhen Deng, Shengming Huang, Qiuyi Ni, Quanxing Yu, Xianjun Luo, Guopei |
author_sort | Liu, Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this study, patients who had undergone curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (612 cases) were included. The efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine-based regimen, stratified by nodal status (negative, positive) or N substage (N0, no nodal involvement; N1, 1-3-node involvement; N2, ≥4-node involvement), was examined. Both the node-negative (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87, P = .006) and node-positive subgroups (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.33-0.62, P < .001) benefited from gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with N0 (ie, the node-negative subgroup) or N1 (HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25-0.52, P < .001) disease benefited from gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. However, patients with N2 tumors (HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.50-1.78, P = .867) had poor response to gemcitabine-based treatment. Therefore, we postulate that resected pancreatic cancer with N2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A more intensive adjuvant regimen may be required for N2 subgroup patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7153189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71531892020-04-20 Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Liu, Chen Cheng, He Jin, Kaizhou Fan, Zhiyao Gong, Yitao Qian, Yunzhen Deng, Shengming Huang, Qiuyi Ni, Quanxing Yu, Xianjun Luo, Guopei Cancer Control Research Article Lymphatic metastasis is a major determinant of the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the outcome of resected pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer stratified by nodal involvement is unclear. In this study, patients who had undergone curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (612 cases) were included. The efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine-based regimen, stratified by nodal status (negative, positive) or N substage (N0, no nodal involvement; N1, 1-3-node involvement; N2, ≥4-node involvement), was examined. Both the node-negative (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87, P = .006) and node-positive subgroups (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.33-0.62, P < .001) benefited from gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with N0 (ie, the node-negative subgroup) or N1 (HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25-0.52, P < .001) disease benefited from gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. However, patients with N2 tumors (HR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.50-1.78, P = .867) had poor response to gemcitabine-based treatment. Therefore, we postulate that resected pancreatic cancer with N2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. A more intensive adjuvant regimen may be required for N2 subgroup patients. SAGE Publications 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7153189/ /pubmed/32268796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Chen Cheng, He Jin, Kaizhou Fan, Zhiyao Gong, Yitao Qian, Yunzhen Deng, Shengming Huang, Qiuyi Ni, Quanxing Yu, Xianjun Luo, Guopei Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title | Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full | Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_short | Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy |
title_sort | resected pancreatic cancer with n2 node involvement is refractory to gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073274820915947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuchen resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT chenghe resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT jinkaizhou resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT fanzhiyao resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT gongyitao resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT qianyunzhen resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT dengshengming resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT huangqiuyi resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT niquanxing resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT yuxianjun resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy AT luoguopei resectedpancreaticcancerwithn2nodeinvolvementisrefractorytogemcitabinebasedadjuvantchemotherapy |