Cargando…

Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to construct and validate a measurement model of women’s preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist (OB/GYN) selection in the private sector of non-clinical parameters. METHODS: This methodological study included 462 respondents in OB/GYN’s offices to a res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setoodefar, Masood, Tabesh, Hamed, Tara, Fatemeh, Eslami, Saeed, Heshmati Nabavi, Fatemeh, Valizadeh Zare, Najmeh, Taheri, Seyyed Hassan, Rajabzadeh Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza, Etminani, Kobra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309456
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2020.82278.1049
_version_ 1783521650440929280
author Setoodefar, Masood
Tabesh, Hamed
Tara, Fatemeh
Eslami, Saeed
Heshmati Nabavi, Fatemeh
Valizadeh Zare, Najmeh
Taheri, Seyyed Hassan
Rajabzadeh Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza
Etminani, Kobra
author_facet Setoodefar, Masood
Tabesh, Hamed
Tara, Fatemeh
Eslami, Saeed
Heshmati Nabavi, Fatemeh
Valizadeh Zare, Najmeh
Taheri, Seyyed Hassan
Rajabzadeh Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza
Etminani, Kobra
author_sort Setoodefar, Masood
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to construct and validate a measurement model of women’s preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist (OB/GYN) selection in the private sector of non-clinical parameters. METHODS: This methodological study included 462 respondents in OB/GYN’s offices to a researcher-made questionnaire. The patients visited 57 offices of OB/GYNs in the city of Mashhad in Iran and completed women’s preferences in OB/GYN selection questionnaire over a 2-month period from January to February 2018. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to verify the instrument’s construct validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test whether the data fit our hypothesized model obtained from EFA model. RESULTS: The first draft of the questionnaire was prepared with 118 items based on literature review. The outcome of content validity assessment was a 51-item questionnaire. Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI) turned out to be 0.80. The results of EFA yielded an instrument with 33 items in six domains, which explained 52.657% of the total variance of the questionnaire. With performing CFA, the 6-factor model with 29 items demonstrated a good fit with the data (CFI=0.952, CMIN/DF=1.613, RMSEA=0.036). Availability and Accessibility, Communicational Skills, Office Environment, Recommendation by Others, Special Services, and Cost and Insurance were found to define the women’s preferences in OB/GYN selection in private sector, Iran. CONCLUSION: The developed measurement model considers the patient’s preferences that influence decision-making process on OB/GYN selection. It can provide useful knowledge for OB/GYNs and policymakers to design appropriate and efficient marketing strategies according to the consumer preferences priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7153421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71534212020-04-17 Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Setoodefar, Masood Tabesh, Hamed Tara, Fatemeh Eslami, Saeed Heshmati Nabavi, Fatemeh Valizadeh Zare, Najmeh Taheri, Seyyed Hassan Rajabzadeh Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza Etminani, Kobra Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to construct and validate a measurement model of women’s preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist (OB/GYN) selection in the private sector of non-clinical parameters. METHODS: This methodological study included 462 respondents in OB/GYN’s offices to a researcher-made questionnaire. The patients visited 57 offices of OB/GYNs in the city of Mashhad in Iran and completed women’s preferences in OB/GYN selection questionnaire over a 2-month period from January to February 2018. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to verify the instrument’s construct validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test whether the data fit our hypothesized model obtained from EFA model. RESULTS: The first draft of the questionnaire was prepared with 118 items based on literature review. The outcome of content validity assessment was a 51-item questionnaire. Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI) turned out to be 0.80. The results of EFA yielded an instrument with 33 items in six domains, which explained 52.657% of the total variance of the questionnaire. With performing CFA, the 6-factor model with 29 items demonstrated a good fit with the data (CFI=0.952, CMIN/DF=1.613, RMSEA=0.036). Availability and Accessibility, Communicational Skills, Office Environment, Recommendation by Others, Special Services, and Cost and Insurance were found to define the women’s preferences in OB/GYN selection in private sector, Iran. CONCLUSION: The developed measurement model considers the patient’s preferences that influence decision-making process on OB/GYN selection. It can provide useful knowledge for OB/GYNs and policymakers to design appropriate and efficient marketing strategies according to the consumer preferences priority. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7153421/ /pubmed/32309456 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2020.82278.1049 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Setoodefar, Masood
Tabesh, Hamed
Tara, Fatemeh
Eslami, Saeed
Heshmati Nabavi, Fatemeh
Valizadeh Zare, Najmeh
Taheri, Seyyed Hassan
Rajabzadeh Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza
Etminani, Kobra
Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_full Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_fullStr Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_short Measurement Model of Women’s Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
title_sort measurement model of women’s preferences in obstetrician and gynecologist selection in the private sector: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309456
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2020.82278.1049
work_keys_str_mv AT setoodefarmasood measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT tabeshhamed measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT tarafatemeh measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT eslamisaeed measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT heshmatinabavifatemeh measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT valizadehzarenajmeh measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT taheriseyyedhassan measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT rajabzadehmoghaddammohammadreza measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT etminanikobra measurementmodelofwomenspreferencesinobstetricianandgynecologistselectionintheprivatesectorexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis