Cargando…
Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay?
OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation and outcomes of telemedicine in a Department of Urology in Northern Italy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: All the outpatient clinical activities during the 4 weeks following the national lockdown (March 9-April 3, 2020) in the Department...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.004 |
_version_ | 1783521669723193344 |
---|---|
author | Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe Mattevi, Daniele Cai, Tommaso Giusti, Guido Proietti, Silvia Malossini, Gianni |
author_facet | Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe Mattevi, Daniele Cai, Tommaso Giusti, Guido Proietti, Silvia Malossini, Gianni |
author_sort | Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation and outcomes of telemedicine in a Department of Urology in Northern Italy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: All the outpatient clinical activities during the 4 weeks following the national lockdown (March 9-April 3, 2020) in the Department of Urology of the Trento Province, Italy, were reviewed and categorized. Expert staff members examined the electronic records, selecting whether the clinic appointments should be canceled or confirmed (via telephone consultation or face-to-face visit). The rate, indication, and modality of visits were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 415 of 928 (45%) scheduled patients canceled their clinic appointment themselves or were canceled by staff members without rescheduling. The remaining 523 (55%) cases were screened undergoing telephone consultation in 295 (56%) and face-to-face visit in 228 (44%). The rate of face-to-face visit decreased from 63% to 9% during week 1 and 4, respectively. Seventy-four percent of face-to-face visits regarded suspected recurrent or new onset malignancy or potentially dangerous clinical conditions (severe urinary symptoms or complicated urinary stones or infection). The median age of patients in the face-to-face and telephone groups was 59 (range 20-69) and 65 years old (range 37-88), respectively. CONCLUSION: A pandemic is a dynamic scenario, requiring reorganization and flexibility of the healthcare delivery. Forty-five percent visits were canceled without rescheduling. Although a minimum portion of face-to-face visit (<10% 1 month after the lockdown) was preserved mostly for suspected malignancy or potentially life-threatening conditions, telemedicine proved a pragmatic approach allowing efficient screening of cases and adequate protection for patients and clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7153527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71535272020-04-14 Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe Mattevi, Daniele Cai, Tommaso Giusti, Guido Proietti, Silvia Malossini, Gianni Urology Special Articles: COVID 19 OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation and outcomes of telemedicine in a Department of Urology in Northern Italy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: All the outpatient clinical activities during the 4 weeks following the national lockdown (March 9-April 3, 2020) in the Department of Urology of the Trento Province, Italy, were reviewed and categorized. Expert staff members examined the electronic records, selecting whether the clinic appointments should be canceled or confirmed (via telephone consultation or face-to-face visit). The rate, indication, and modality of visits were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 415 of 928 (45%) scheduled patients canceled their clinic appointment themselves or were canceled by staff members without rescheduling. The remaining 523 (55%) cases were screened undergoing telephone consultation in 295 (56%) and face-to-face visit in 228 (44%). The rate of face-to-face visit decreased from 63% to 9% during week 1 and 4, respectively. Seventy-four percent of face-to-face visits regarded suspected recurrent or new onset malignancy or potentially dangerous clinical conditions (severe urinary symptoms or complicated urinary stones or infection). The median age of patients in the face-to-face and telephone groups was 59 (range 20-69) and 65 years old (range 37-88), respectively. CONCLUSION: A pandemic is a dynamic scenario, requiring reorganization and flexibility of the healthcare delivery. Forty-five percent visits were canceled without rescheduling. Although a minimum portion of face-to-face visit (<10% 1 month after the lockdown) was preserved mostly for suspected malignancy or potentially life-threatening conditions, telemedicine proved a pragmatic approach allowing efficient screening of cases and adequate protection for patients and clinicians. Elsevier Inc. 2020-06 2020-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7153527/ /pubmed/32298686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.004 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Special Articles: COVID 19 Luciani, Lorenzo Giuseppe Mattevi, Daniele Cai, Tommaso Giusti, Guido Proietti, Silvia Malossini, Gianni Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title | Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title_full | Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title_fullStr | Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title_full_unstemmed | Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title_short | Teleurology in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Here to Stay? |
title_sort | teleurology in the time of covid-19 pandemic: here to stay? |
topic | Special Articles: COVID 19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucianilorenzogiuseppe teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay AT mattevidaniele teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay AT caitommaso teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay AT giustiguido teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay AT proiettisilvia teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay AT malossinigianni teleurologyinthetimeofcovid19pandemicheretostay |