Cargando…

Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest

Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Jin, Hao, Dongmei, Yang, Lin, Du, Mengqing, Song, Xiaoxiao, Jiang, Hongqing, Zhang, Yunhan, Zheng, Dingchang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.003
Descripción
Sumario:Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using random forest (RF). EHG signals from 300 pregnant women were divided into two groups depending on when the signals were recorded: i) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PE and TE group), and ii) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded during or after the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PL and TL group). 31 linear features and nonlinear features were derived from each EHG signal, and then compared comprehensively within PE and TE group, and PL and TL group. After employing the adaptive synthetic sampling approach and six-fold cross-validation, the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate RF classification. For PL and TL group, RF achieved the ACC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.97, and AUC of 0.80. Similarly, their corresponding values were 0.92, 0.88, 0.96 and 0.88 for PE and TE group, indicating that RF could be used to recognize preterm delivery effectively with EHG signals recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation.