Cargando…

Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest

Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Jin, Hao, Dongmei, Yang, Lin, Du, Mengqing, Song, Xiaoxiao, Jiang, Hongqing, Zhang, Yunhan, Zheng, Dingchang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.003
_version_ 1783521707410063360
author Peng, Jin
Hao, Dongmei
Yang, Lin
Du, Mengqing
Song, Xiaoxiao
Jiang, Hongqing
Zhang, Yunhan
Zheng, Dingchang
author_facet Peng, Jin
Hao, Dongmei
Yang, Lin
Du, Mengqing
Song, Xiaoxiao
Jiang, Hongqing
Zhang, Yunhan
Zheng, Dingchang
author_sort Peng, Jin
collection PubMed
description Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using random forest (RF). EHG signals from 300 pregnant women were divided into two groups depending on when the signals were recorded: i) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PE and TE group), and ii) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded during or after the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PL and TL group). 31 linear features and nonlinear features were derived from each EHG signal, and then compared comprehensively within PE and TE group, and PL and TL group. After employing the adaptive synthetic sampling approach and six-fold cross-validation, the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate RF classification. For PL and TL group, RF achieved the ACC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.97, and AUC of 0.80. Similarly, their corresponding values were 0.92, 0.88, 0.96 and 0.88 for PE and TE group, indicating that RF could be used to recognize preterm delivery effectively with EHG signals recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7153772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71537722020-04-17 Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest Peng, Jin Hao, Dongmei Yang, Lin Du, Mengqing Song, Xiaoxiao Jiang, Hongqing Zhang, Yunhan Zheng, Dingchang Biocybern Biomed Eng Article Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using random forest (RF). EHG signals from 300 pregnant women were divided into two groups depending on when the signals were recorded: i) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PE and TE group), and ii) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded during or after the 26(th) week of gestation (denoted by PL and TL group). 31 linear features and nonlinear features were derived from each EHG signal, and then compared comprehensively within PE and TE group, and PL and TL group. After employing the adaptive synthetic sampling approach and six-fold cross-validation, the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate RF classification. For PL and TL group, RF achieved the ACC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.97, and AUC of 0.80. Similarly, their corresponding values were 0.92, 0.88, 0.96 and 0.88 for PE and TE group, indicating that RF could be used to recognize preterm delivery effectively with EHG signals recorded before the 26(th) week of gestation. PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7153772/ /pubmed/32308250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.003 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peng, Jin
Hao, Dongmei
Yang, Lin
Du, Mengqing
Song, Xiaoxiao
Jiang, Hongqing
Zhang, Yunhan
Zheng, Dingchang
Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title_full Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title_fullStr Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title_short Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest
title_sort evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random forest
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT pengjin evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT haodongmei evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT yanglin evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT dumengqing evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT songxiaoxiao evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT jianghongqing evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT zhangyunhan evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest
AT zhengdingchang evaluationofelectrohysterogrammeasuredfromdifferentgestationalweeksforrecognizingpretermdeliveryapreliminarystudyusingrandomforest