Cargando…

Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research

Hypothesis generation is a critical step in research and a cornerstone in the rare disease field. Research is most efficient when those hypotheses are based on the entirety of knowledge known to date. Systematic review articles are commonly used in biomedicine to summarize existing knowledge and con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Queralt-Rosinach, Núria, Stupp, Gregory S, Li, Tong Shu, Mayers, Michael, Hoatlin, Maureen E, Might, Matthew, Good, Benjamin M, Su, Andrew I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa015
_version_ 1783521739081252864
author Queralt-Rosinach, Núria
Stupp, Gregory S
Li, Tong Shu
Mayers, Michael
Hoatlin, Maureen E
Might, Matthew
Good, Benjamin M
Su, Andrew I
author_facet Queralt-Rosinach, Núria
Stupp, Gregory S
Li, Tong Shu
Mayers, Michael
Hoatlin, Maureen E
Might, Matthew
Good, Benjamin M
Su, Andrew I
author_sort Queralt-Rosinach, Núria
collection PubMed
description Hypothesis generation is a critical step in research and a cornerstone in the rare disease field. Research is most efficient when those hypotheses are based on the entirety of knowledge known to date. Systematic review articles are commonly used in biomedicine to summarize existing knowledge and contextualize experimental data. But the information contained within review articles is typically only expressed as free-text, which is difficult to use computationally. Researchers struggle to navigate, collect and remix prior knowledge as it is scattered in several silos without seamless integration and access. This lack of a structured information framework hinders research by both experimental and computational scientists. To better organize knowledge and data, we built a structured review article that is specifically focused on NGLY1 Deficiency, an ultra-rare genetic disease first reported in 2012. We represented this structured review as a knowledge graph and then stored this knowledge graph in a Neo4j database to simplify dissemination, querying and visualization of the network. Relative to free-text, this structured review better promotes the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability (FAIR). In collaboration with domain experts in NGLY1 Deficiency, we demonstrate how this resource can improve the efficiency and comprehensiveness of hypothesis generation. We also developed a read–write interface that allows domain experts to contribute FAIR structured knowledge to this community resource. In contrast to traditional free-text review articles, this structured review exists as a living knowledge graph that is curated by humans and accessible to computational analyses. Finally, we have generalized this workflow into modular and repurposable components that can be applied to other domain areas. This NGLY1 Deficiency-focused network is publicly available at http://ngly1graph.org/. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Database URL: http://ngly1graph.org/. Network data files are at: https://github.com/SuLab/ngly1-graph and source code at: https://github.com/SuLab/bioknowledge-reviewer. CONTACT: asu@scripps.edu
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7153956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71539562020-04-17 Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research Queralt-Rosinach, Núria Stupp, Gregory S Li, Tong Shu Mayers, Michael Hoatlin, Maureen E Might, Matthew Good, Benjamin M Su, Andrew I Database (Oxford) Original Article Hypothesis generation is a critical step in research and a cornerstone in the rare disease field. Research is most efficient when those hypotheses are based on the entirety of knowledge known to date. Systematic review articles are commonly used in biomedicine to summarize existing knowledge and contextualize experimental data. But the information contained within review articles is typically only expressed as free-text, which is difficult to use computationally. Researchers struggle to navigate, collect and remix prior knowledge as it is scattered in several silos without seamless integration and access. This lack of a structured information framework hinders research by both experimental and computational scientists. To better organize knowledge and data, we built a structured review article that is specifically focused on NGLY1 Deficiency, an ultra-rare genetic disease first reported in 2012. We represented this structured review as a knowledge graph and then stored this knowledge graph in a Neo4j database to simplify dissemination, querying and visualization of the network. Relative to free-text, this structured review better promotes the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability (FAIR). In collaboration with domain experts in NGLY1 Deficiency, we demonstrate how this resource can improve the efficiency and comprehensiveness of hypothesis generation. We also developed a read–write interface that allows domain experts to contribute FAIR structured knowledge to this community resource. In contrast to traditional free-text review articles, this structured review exists as a living knowledge graph that is curated by humans and accessible to computational analyses. Finally, we have generalized this workflow into modular and repurposable components that can be applied to other domain areas. This NGLY1 Deficiency-focused network is publicly available at http://ngly1graph.org/. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Database URL: http://ngly1graph.org/. Network data files are at: https://github.com/SuLab/ngly1-graph and source code at: https://github.com/SuLab/bioknowledge-reviewer. CONTACT: asu@scripps.edu Oxford University Press 2020-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7153956/ /pubmed/32283553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa015 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Queralt-Rosinach, Núria
Stupp, Gregory S
Li, Tong Shu
Mayers, Michael
Hoatlin, Maureen E
Might, Matthew
Good, Benjamin M
Su, Andrew I
Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title_full Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title_fullStr Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title_full_unstemmed Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title_short Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
title_sort structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa015
work_keys_str_mv AT queraltrosinachnuria structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT stuppgregorys structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT litongshu structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT mayersmichael structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT hoatlinmaureene structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT mightmatthew structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT goodbenjaminm structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch
AT suandrewi structuredreviewsfordataandknowledgedrivenresearch