Cargando…
Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture marke...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2 |
_version_ | 1783521746771509248 |
---|---|
author | Metcalf, C. D. Phillips, C. Forrester, A. Glodowski, J. Simpson, K. Everitt, C. Darekar, A. King, L. Warwick, D. Dickinson, A. S. |
author_facet | Metcalf, C. D. Phillips, C. Forrester, A. Glodowski, J. Simpson, K. Everitt, C. Darekar, A. King, L. Warwick, D. Dickinson, A. S. |
author_sort | Metcalf, C. D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7154021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71540212020-04-18 Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers Metcalf, C. D. Phillips, C. Forrester, A. Glodowski, J. Simpson, K. Everitt, C. Darekar, A. King, L. Warwick, D. Dickinson, A. S. Ann Biomed Eng Original Article This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7154021/ /pubmed/32076882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Metcalf, C. D. Phillips, C. Forrester, A. Glodowski, J. Simpson, K. Everitt, C. Darekar, A. King, L. Warwick, D. Dickinson, A. S. Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title | Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title_full | Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title_short | Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers |
title_sort | quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalfcd quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT phillipsc quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT forrestera quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT glodowskij quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT simpsonk quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT everittc quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT darekara quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT kingl quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT warwickd quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers AT dickinsonas quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers |