Cargando…

Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers

This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture marke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalf, C. D., Phillips, C., Forrester, A., Glodowski, J., Simpson, K., Everitt, C., Darekar, A., King, L., Warwick, D., Dickinson, A. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2
_version_ 1783521746771509248
author Metcalf, C. D.
Phillips, C.
Forrester, A.
Glodowski, J.
Simpson, K.
Everitt, C.
Darekar, A.
King, L.
Warwick, D.
Dickinson, A. S.
author_facet Metcalf, C. D.
Phillips, C.
Forrester, A.
Glodowski, J.
Simpson, K.
Everitt, C.
Darekar, A.
King, L.
Warwick, D.
Dickinson, A. S.
author_sort Metcalf, C. D.
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71540212020-04-18 Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers Metcalf, C. D. Phillips, C. Forrester, A. Glodowski, J. Simpson, K. Everitt, C. Darekar, A. King, L. Warwick, D. Dickinson, A. S. Ann Biomed Eng Original Article This study assessed the accuracy of marker-based kinematic analysis of the fingers, considering soft tissue artefacts (STA) and marker imaging uncertainty. We collected CT images of the hand from healthy volunteers with fingers in full extension, mid- and full-flexion, including motion capture markers. Bones and markers were segmented and meshed. The bone meshes for each volunteer’s scans were aligned using the proximal phalanx to study the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), and using the middle phalanx to study the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The angle changes between positions were extracted. The HAWK protocol was used to calculate PIP and DIP joint flexion angles in each position based on the marker centroids. Finally the marker locations were ‘corrected’ relative to the underlying bones, and the flexion angles recalculated. Static and dynamic marker imaging uncertainty was evaluated using a wand. A strong positive correlation was observed between marker- and CT-based joint angle changes with 0.980 and 0.892 regression slopes for PIP and DIP, respectively, and Root Mean Squared Errors below 4°. Notably for the PIP joint, correlation was worsened by STA correction. The 95% imaging uncertainty interval was < ± 1° for joints, and < ± 0.25 mm for segment lengths. In summary, the HAWK marker set’s accuracy was characterised for finger joint flexion angle changes in a small group of healthy individuals and static poses, and was found to benefit from skin movements during flexion. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7154021/ /pubmed/32076882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Metcalf, C. D.
Phillips, C.
Forrester, A.
Glodowski, J.
Simpson, K.
Everitt, C.
Darekar, A.
King, L.
Warwick, D.
Dickinson, A. S.
Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title_full Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title_fullStr Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title_short Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers
title_sort quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfcd quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT phillipsc quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT forrestera quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT glodowskij quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT simpsonk quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT everittc quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT darekara quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT kingl quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT warwickd quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers
AT dickinsonas quantifyingsofttissueartefactsandimagingvariabilityinmotioncaptureofthefingers