Cargando…
Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309411 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03 |
_version_ | 1783521802642784256 |
---|---|
author | Aleman, Rene Lo Menzo, Emanuele Szomstein, Samuel Rosenthal, Raul J. |
author_facet | Aleman, Rene Lo Menzo, Emanuele Szomstein, Samuel Rosenthal, Raul J. |
author_sort | Aleman, Rene |
collection | PubMed |
description | The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords: “one-anastomosis gastric bypass” AND “outcomes”. A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7154323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71543232020-04-17 Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass Aleman, Rene Lo Menzo, Emanuele Szomstein, Samuel Rosenthal, Raul J. Ann Transl Med Review Article The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords: “one-anastomosis gastric bypass” AND “outcomes”. A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7154323/ /pubmed/32309411 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Aleman, Rene Lo Menzo, Emanuele Szomstein, Samuel Rosenthal, Raul J. Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title | Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title_full | Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title_fullStr | Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title_short | Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
title_sort | efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309411 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alemanrene efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass AT lomenzoemanuele efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass AT szomsteinsamuel efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass AT rosenthalraulj efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass |