Cargando…

Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aleman, Rene, Lo Menzo, Emanuele, Szomstein, Samuel, Rosenthal, Raul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309411
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03
_version_ 1783521802642784256
author Aleman, Rene
Lo Menzo, Emanuele
Szomstein, Samuel
Rosenthal, Raul J.
author_facet Aleman, Rene
Lo Menzo, Emanuele
Szomstein, Samuel
Rosenthal, Raul J.
author_sort Aleman, Rene
collection PubMed
description The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords: “one-anastomosis gastric bypass” AND “outcomes”. A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71543232020-04-17 Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass Aleman, Rene Lo Menzo, Emanuele Szomstein, Samuel Rosenthal, Raul J. Ann Transl Med Review Article The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords: “one-anastomosis gastric bypass” AND “outcomes”. A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7154323/ /pubmed/32309411 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Aleman, Rene
Lo Menzo, Emanuele
Szomstein, Samuel
Rosenthal, Raul J.
Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title_full Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title_fullStr Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title_short Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
title_sort efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309411
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.03
work_keys_str_mv AT alemanrene efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass
AT lomenzoemanuele efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass
AT szomsteinsamuel efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass
AT rosenthalraulj efficiencyandrisksofoneanastomosisgastricbypass