Cargando…
Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging
BACKGROUND: To assess the radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL) measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in comparison with Scheimpflug imaging. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309324 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.01.100 |
_version_ | 1783521819020492800 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Zhenzhen Ruan, Xiaoting Wang, Wei Liu, Juzi Meng, Yijing Gu, Xiaoxun Fu, Jun Luo, Lixia Liu, Yizhi |
author_facet | Liu, Zhenzhen Ruan, Xiaoting Wang, Wei Liu, Juzi Meng, Yijing Gu, Xiaoxun Fu, Jun Luo, Lixia Liu, Yizhi |
author_sort | Liu, Zhenzhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL) measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in comparison with Scheimpflug imaging. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. We enrolled 59 eyes, including 30 eyes from 30 cataractous volunteers (59 to 87 years) and 29 eyes from 29 young participants (19 to 49 years). After mydriasis, the RAL was measured automatically by the built-in software in the AS-OCT (CASIA 2). The Scheimpflug images were measured with the build-in caliper tool of the Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), and RAL were further calculated with the principle of best-fitted circle. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of RAL measurement using Scheimpflug camera were evaluated with limit of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Consistency between RAL measurement of Scheimpflug camera and AS-OCT were assessed with LoA, correlation analysis and linear regression. RESULTS: For all subjects, intraobserver (LoA: −0.25 to 0.23 mm, ICC: 0.996) and interobserver reproducibility (LoA: −0.85 to 0.92 mm, ICC: 0.947) of RAL were good using Scheimpflug imaging. Both AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging found that the age-related cataract participants had smaller RAL (P=0.010, P=0.001 respectively). LoA of RAL measurement between AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging was −3.83 to −0.79 mm, and the Pearson correlation efficient was 0.909 (P<0.001). The RAL values measured by AS-OCT were significantly greater than that by Scheimpflug camera with a mean difference of 2.31 mm for all participants (P<0.001). The RAL measurement could be converted using the equation: Y(CASIA 2) =1.155 × X(Pentacam) + 1.060. CONCLUSIONS: Both Scheimpflug camera system with internal caliper tool and the AS-OCT are fast and non-contact tools that could measure RAL successfully. The two measurement results are highly correlated and interchangeable through linear regression equation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7154444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71544442020-04-17 Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging Liu, Zhenzhen Ruan, Xiaoting Wang, Wei Liu, Juzi Meng, Yijing Gu, Xiaoxun Fu, Jun Luo, Lixia Liu, Yizhi Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To assess the radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL) measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in comparison with Scheimpflug imaging. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. We enrolled 59 eyes, including 30 eyes from 30 cataractous volunteers (59 to 87 years) and 29 eyes from 29 young participants (19 to 49 years). After mydriasis, the RAL was measured automatically by the built-in software in the AS-OCT (CASIA 2). The Scheimpflug images were measured with the build-in caliper tool of the Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), and RAL were further calculated with the principle of best-fitted circle. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of RAL measurement using Scheimpflug camera were evaluated with limit of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Consistency between RAL measurement of Scheimpflug camera and AS-OCT were assessed with LoA, correlation analysis and linear regression. RESULTS: For all subjects, intraobserver (LoA: −0.25 to 0.23 mm, ICC: 0.996) and interobserver reproducibility (LoA: −0.85 to 0.92 mm, ICC: 0.947) of RAL were good using Scheimpflug imaging. Both AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging found that the age-related cataract participants had smaller RAL (P=0.010, P=0.001 respectively). LoA of RAL measurement between AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging was −3.83 to −0.79 mm, and the Pearson correlation efficient was 0.909 (P<0.001). The RAL values measured by AS-OCT were significantly greater than that by Scheimpflug camera with a mean difference of 2.31 mm for all participants (P<0.001). The RAL measurement could be converted using the equation: Y(CASIA 2) =1.155 × X(Pentacam) + 1.060. CONCLUSIONS: Both Scheimpflug camera system with internal caliper tool and the AS-OCT are fast and non-contact tools that could measure RAL successfully. The two measurement results are highly correlated and interchangeable through linear regression equation. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7154444/ /pubmed/32309324 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.01.100 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liu, Zhenzhen Ruan, Xiaoting Wang, Wei Liu, Juzi Meng, Yijing Gu, Xiaoxun Fu, Jun Luo, Lixia Liu, Yizhi Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title | Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title_full | Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title_fullStr | Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title_short | Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging |
title_sort | comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements in vivo using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and scheimpflug imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309324 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.01.100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuzhenzhen comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT ruanxiaoting comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT wangwei comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT liujuzi comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT mengyijing comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT guxiaoxun comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT fujun comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT luolixia comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging AT liuyizhi comparisonofradiusofanteriorlenssurfacecurvaturemeasurementsinvivousingtheanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyandscheimpflugimaging |