Cargando…

Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND: Recurring abdominal pain is a characteristic and often unpredictable and debilitating symptom of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS‐D). Measuring the effects of IBS‐D treatments on abdominal pain remains a significant challenge in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lembo, Anthony J., Covington, Paul S., Dove, Leonard S., Andrae, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13774
_version_ 1783521859962142720
author Lembo, Anthony J.
Covington, Paul S.
Dove, Leonard S.
Andrae, David A.
author_facet Lembo, Anthony J.
Covington, Paul S.
Dove, Leonard S.
Andrae, David A.
author_sort Lembo, Anthony J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurring abdominal pain is a characteristic and often unpredictable and debilitating symptom of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS‐D). Measuring the effects of IBS‐D treatments on abdominal pain remains a significant challenge in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of eluxadoline through various post hoc analyses. METHODS: Data from two eluxadoline Phase 3 trials were pooled over 26 weeks, comparing eluxadoline 100 mg twice daily to placebo. Worst abdominal pain (WAP) was measured daily on a 0‐10 scale. WAP responder criteria were prospectively defined as a ≥30% improvement in daily WAP score on ≥50% of days. Pairwise, two‐sided Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel tests assessed treatment effects. Cumulative distribution functions were used to plot WAP response rates using variations on the response criteria. KEY RESULTS: Of 1615 patients with IBS‐D (66% female, mean age 46 years), 806 received eluxadoline and 809 received placebo; 48.3% and 44.0% were WAP responders (≥30% improvement), respectively (P value not significant). When the response threshold was increased to 50% daily WAP improvement from baseline, a significantly greater percentage of eluxadoline‐treated patients versus placebo‐treated patients were WAP responders (38.7% vs 32.5%, respectively; P = .009). At Week 26, average WAP changes from baseline were −3.4 and −3.0 points, respectively (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Despite small effect sizes, eluxadoline demonstrated consistent and sustained improvement in WAP compared to placebo across a range of prospective and post hoc analyses. Assessing WAP response across a range of measures is important for fully understanding a treatment's efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71546352020-04-14 Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials Lembo, Anthony J. Covington, Paul S. Dove, Leonard S. Andrae, David A. Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Articles BACKGROUND: Recurring abdominal pain is a characteristic and often unpredictable and debilitating symptom of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS‐D). Measuring the effects of IBS‐D treatments on abdominal pain remains a significant challenge in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of eluxadoline through various post hoc analyses. METHODS: Data from two eluxadoline Phase 3 trials were pooled over 26 weeks, comparing eluxadoline 100 mg twice daily to placebo. Worst abdominal pain (WAP) was measured daily on a 0‐10 scale. WAP responder criteria were prospectively defined as a ≥30% improvement in daily WAP score on ≥50% of days. Pairwise, two‐sided Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel tests assessed treatment effects. Cumulative distribution functions were used to plot WAP response rates using variations on the response criteria. KEY RESULTS: Of 1615 patients with IBS‐D (66% female, mean age 46 years), 806 received eluxadoline and 809 received placebo; 48.3% and 44.0% were WAP responders (≥30% improvement), respectively (P value not significant). When the response threshold was increased to 50% daily WAP improvement from baseline, a significantly greater percentage of eluxadoline‐treated patients versus placebo‐treated patients were WAP responders (38.7% vs 32.5%, respectively; P = .009). At Week 26, average WAP changes from baseline were −3.4 and −3.0 points, respectively (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Despite small effect sizes, eluxadoline demonstrated consistent and sustained improvement in WAP compared to placebo across a range of prospective and post hoc analyses. Assessing WAP response across a range of measures is important for fully understanding a treatment's efficacy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-27 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7154635/ /pubmed/31984655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13774 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lembo, Anthony J.
Covington, Paul S.
Dove, Leonard S.
Andrae, David A.
Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title_full Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title_fullStr Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title_short Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials
title_sort effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with ibs‐d: additional post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13774
work_keys_str_mv AT lemboanthonyj effectsoftreatmentwitheluxadolineonabdominalpaininpatientswithibsdadditionalposthocanalysesofphase3trials
AT covingtonpauls effectsoftreatmentwitheluxadolineonabdominalpaininpatientswithibsdadditionalposthocanalysesofphase3trials
AT doveleonards effectsoftreatmentwitheluxadolineonabdominalpaininpatientswithibsdadditionalposthocanalysesofphase3trials
AT andraedavida effectsoftreatmentwitheluxadolineonabdominalpaininpatientswithibsdadditionalposthocanalysesofphase3trials