Cargando…
A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the safety and the pharmacokinetics of dihydroergotamine (DHE) after administration of intranasal DHE powder (STS101), intranasal DHE spray (Migranal(®)), and intramuscular (IM) DHE injection in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a 2‐part, active‐controlled, 3‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31985049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13737 |
_version_ | 1783521879036788736 |
---|---|
author | Albrecht, Detlef Iwashima, Mic Dillon, Debbie Harris, Stuart Levy, Jeff |
author_facet | Albrecht, Detlef Iwashima, Mic Dillon, Debbie Harris, Stuart Levy, Jeff |
author_sort | Albrecht, Detlef |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the safety and the pharmacokinetics of dihydroergotamine (DHE) after administration of intranasal DHE powder (STS101), intranasal DHE spray (Migranal(®)), and intramuscular (IM) DHE injection in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a 2‐part, active‐controlled, 3‐period crossover study over 3 weeks, separated by 1‐week washout periods. In part 1, 3 ascending dosage strengths of STS101 (1.3, 2.6, and 5.2 mg) were administered to 15 healthy subjects with no history of migraine. In part 2, 27 healthy subjects were administered 1 dose each of STS101 5.2 mg, Migranal DHE Mesylate Liquid Nasal Spray 2.0 mg, and IM DHE Mesylate 1.0 mg in a randomized order. Liquid chromatography, tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma levels of DHE and its major metabolite, 8′OH‐DHE. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C (max), T (max), AUC(0‐2 h), AUC(0‐48 h), AUC(0‐inf), and t (1/2)) for DHE and metabolite were calculated. Geometric means and 90% confidence intervals of log‐transformed data were calculated and the ratio of means compared. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, subjective and objective assessments of nasal signs and symptoms, and changes in laboratory parameters. The study is registered as NCT03874832. RESULTS: Forty‐three subjects were enrolled and received study medication. Forty completed all study activities, 14 in part 1 and 26 in part 2. In part 1, DHE plasma levels showed a dose‐dependent increase, with STS101 5.2 mg reaching a mean C (max) of 1870 pg/mL with a T (max) of 23 minutes. In part 2, STS101 5.2 mg showed rapid absorption, achieving mean DHE plasma concentrations of 1230 and 1850 pg/mL at 10 and 15 minutes after administration, respectively. In comparison to Migranal, STS101 5.2 mg showed approximately 2‐fold higher C (max) (2175 vs 961 pg/mL), AUC(0‐2 h) (2979 vs 1316 h × pg/mL), and AUC(0‐inf) (12,030 vs 6498 h × pg/mL), respectively. The mean AUC(0‐inf) of STS101 5.2 mg was comparable to IM DHE (12,030 vs 13,650 h × pg/mL). STS101 5.2 mg showed substantially lower variability compared to Migranal for C (max) (41% vs 76%), AUC(0‐2 h) (39% vs 75%), and AUC(0‐inf) (39% vs 55%). The incidence of treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs), all mild and transient, reported in parts 1 and 2 combined was 9/15 (60%), 5/15 (33%), and 16/41 (39%) of the subjects after 1.3, 2.6, and 5.2 mg STS101, respectively, and 4/26 (15%) and 5/27 (19%) of the subjects after IM DHE and Migranal, respectively. CONCLUSION: STS101 showed rapid absorption, achieving effective DHE plasma concentrations within 10 minutes. It achieved substantially higher C (max), AUC(0‐2 h) and AUC(0‐inf), compared to Migranal suggesting potentially better efficacy than Migranal. Its variability was better than Migranal, thus offering improved consistency of response. AUC(0‐inf) was comparable to IM DHE, suggesting prolonged action and low recurrence. Additionally, the C (max) was sufficiently low to avoid any significant nausea reported with IV DHE. Thus, STS101 is an easy to administer, non‐injected, acute treatment for migraine, with a favorable tolerability profile and is expected to provide rapid and consistent freedom from pain and associated migraine symptoms without recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7154716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71547162020-04-14 A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects Albrecht, Detlef Iwashima, Mic Dillon, Debbie Harris, Stuart Levy, Jeff Headache Research Submissions OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the safety and the pharmacokinetics of dihydroergotamine (DHE) after administration of intranasal DHE powder (STS101), intranasal DHE spray (Migranal(®)), and intramuscular (IM) DHE injection in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a 2‐part, active‐controlled, 3‐period crossover study over 3 weeks, separated by 1‐week washout periods. In part 1, 3 ascending dosage strengths of STS101 (1.3, 2.6, and 5.2 mg) were administered to 15 healthy subjects with no history of migraine. In part 2, 27 healthy subjects were administered 1 dose each of STS101 5.2 mg, Migranal DHE Mesylate Liquid Nasal Spray 2.0 mg, and IM DHE Mesylate 1.0 mg in a randomized order. Liquid chromatography, tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma levels of DHE and its major metabolite, 8′OH‐DHE. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C (max), T (max), AUC(0‐2 h), AUC(0‐48 h), AUC(0‐inf), and t (1/2)) for DHE and metabolite were calculated. Geometric means and 90% confidence intervals of log‐transformed data were calculated and the ratio of means compared. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, subjective and objective assessments of nasal signs and symptoms, and changes in laboratory parameters. The study is registered as NCT03874832. RESULTS: Forty‐three subjects were enrolled and received study medication. Forty completed all study activities, 14 in part 1 and 26 in part 2. In part 1, DHE plasma levels showed a dose‐dependent increase, with STS101 5.2 mg reaching a mean C (max) of 1870 pg/mL with a T (max) of 23 minutes. In part 2, STS101 5.2 mg showed rapid absorption, achieving mean DHE plasma concentrations of 1230 and 1850 pg/mL at 10 and 15 minutes after administration, respectively. In comparison to Migranal, STS101 5.2 mg showed approximately 2‐fold higher C (max) (2175 vs 961 pg/mL), AUC(0‐2 h) (2979 vs 1316 h × pg/mL), and AUC(0‐inf) (12,030 vs 6498 h × pg/mL), respectively. The mean AUC(0‐inf) of STS101 5.2 mg was comparable to IM DHE (12,030 vs 13,650 h × pg/mL). STS101 5.2 mg showed substantially lower variability compared to Migranal for C (max) (41% vs 76%), AUC(0‐2 h) (39% vs 75%), and AUC(0‐inf) (39% vs 55%). The incidence of treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs), all mild and transient, reported in parts 1 and 2 combined was 9/15 (60%), 5/15 (33%), and 16/41 (39%) of the subjects after 1.3, 2.6, and 5.2 mg STS101, respectively, and 4/26 (15%) and 5/27 (19%) of the subjects after IM DHE and Migranal, respectively. CONCLUSION: STS101 showed rapid absorption, achieving effective DHE plasma concentrations within 10 minutes. It achieved substantially higher C (max), AUC(0‐2 h) and AUC(0‐inf), compared to Migranal suggesting potentially better efficacy than Migranal. Its variability was better than Migranal, thus offering improved consistency of response. AUC(0‐inf) was comparable to IM DHE, suggesting prolonged action and low recurrence. Additionally, the C (max) was sufficiently low to avoid any significant nausea reported with IV DHE. Thus, STS101 is an easy to administer, non‐injected, acute treatment for migraine, with a favorable tolerability profile and is expected to provide rapid and consistent freedom from pain and associated migraine symptoms without recurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-27 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7154716/ /pubmed/31985049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13737 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Submissions Albrecht, Detlef Iwashima, Mic Dillon, Debbie Harris, Stuart Levy, Jeff A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title | A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title_full | A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title_fullStr | A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title_short | A Phase 1, Randomized, Open‐Label, Safety, Tolerability, and Comparative Bioavailability Study of Intranasal Dihydroergotamine Powder (STS101), Intramuscular Dihydroergotamine Mesylate, and Intranasal DHE Mesylate Spray in Healthy Adult Subjects |
title_sort | phase 1, randomized, open‐label, safety, tolerability, and comparative bioavailability study of intranasal dihydroergotamine powder (sts101), intramuscular dihydroergotamine mesylate, and intranasal dhe mesylate spray in healthy adult subjects |
topic | Research Submissions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31985049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albrechtdetlef aphase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT iwashimamic aphase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT dillondebbie aphase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT harrisstuart aphase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT levyjeff aphase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT albrechtdetlef phase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT iwashimamic phase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT dillondebbie phase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT harrisstuart phase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects AT levyjeff phase1randomizedopenlabelsafetytolerabilityandcomparativebioavailabilitystudyofintranasaldihydroergotaminepowdersts101intramusculardihydroergotaminemesylateandintranasaldhemesylatesprayinhealthyadultsubjects |