Cargando…
First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4
R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31792945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16264 |
_version_ | 1783521883196489728 |
---|---|
author | Walewski, Jan Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Ewa Michalski, Wojciech Rymkiewicz, Grzegorz Szpila, Tomasz Butrym, Aleksandra Giza, Agnieszka Zaucha, Jan M. Kalinka‐Warzocha, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Agata Zimowska‐Curyło, Dagmara Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Wanda Tyczyńska, Agata Romejko‐Jarosińska, Joanna Dąbrowska‐Iwanicka, Anna Gruszecka, Beata Jamrozek‐Jedlińska, Maria Borawska, Anna Hołda, Waldemar Porowska, Agnieszka Romanowicz, Agnieszka Hellmann, Andrzej Stella‐Hołowiecka, Beata Deptała, Andrzej Jurczak, Wojciech |
author_facet | Walewski, Jan Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Ewa Michalski, Wojciech Rymkiewicz, Grzegorz Szpila, Tomasz Butrym, Aleksandra Giza, Agnieszka Zaucha, Jan M. Kalinka‐Warzocha, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Agata Zimowska‐Curyło, Dagmara Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Wanda Tyczyńska, Agata Romejko‐Jarosińska, Joanna Dąbrowska‐Iwanicka, Anna Gruszecka, Beata Jamrozek‐Jedlińska, Maria Borawska, Anna Hołda, Waldemar Porowska, Agnieszka Romanowicz, Agnieszka Hellmann, Andrzej Stella‐Hołowiecka, Beata Deptała, Andrzej Jurczak, Wojciech |
author_sort | Walewski, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m(2) q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7154735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71547352020-04-15 First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 Walewski, Jan Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Ewa Michalski, Wojciech Rymkiewicz, Grzegorz Szpila, Tomasz Butrym, Aleksandra Giza, Agnieszka Zaucha, Jan M. Kalinka‐Warzocha, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Agata Zimowska‐Curyło, Dagmara Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Wanda Tyczyńska, Agata Romejko‐Jarosińska, Joanna Dąbrowska‐Iwanicka, Anna Gruszecka, Beata Jamrozek‐Jedlińska, Maria Borawska, Anna Hołda, Waldemar Porowska, Agnieszka Romanowicz, Agnieszka Hellmann, Andrzej Stella‐Hołowiecka, Beata Deptała, Andrzej Jurczak, Wojciech Br J Haematol Haematological Malignancy – Clinical R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m(2) q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-02 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7154735/ /pubmed/31792945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16264 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Haematological Malignancy – Clinical Walewski, Jan Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Ewa Michalski, Wojciech Rymkiewicz, Grzegorz Szpila, Tomasz Butrym, Aleksandra Giza, Agnieszka Zaucha, Jan M. Kalinka‐Warzocha, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Agata Zimowska‐Curyło, Dagmara Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Wanda Tyczyńska, Agata Romejko‐Jarosińska, Joanna Dąbrowska‐Iwanicka, Anna Gruszecka, Beata Jamrozek‐Jedlińska, Maria Borawska, Anna Hołda, Waldemar Porowska, Agnieszka Romanowicz, Agnieszka Hellmann, Andrzej Stella‐Hołowiecka, Beata Deptała, Andrzej Jurczak, Wojciech First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title | First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title_full | First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title_fullStr | First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title_full_unstemmed | First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title_short | First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4 |
title_sort | first‐line r‐cvp versus r‐chop induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. a multicentre, phase iii randomized study by the polish lymphoma research group plrg4 |
topic | Haematological Malignancy – Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31792945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walewskijan firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT paszkiewiczkozikewa firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT michalskiwojciech firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT rymkiewiczgrzegorz firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT szpilatomasz firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT butrymaleksandra firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT gizaagnieszka firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT zauchajanm firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT kalinkawarzochaewa firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT wieczorkiewiczagata firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT zimowskacuryłodagmara firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT knopinskaposłusznywanda firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT tyczynskaagata firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT romejkojarosinskajoanna firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT dabrowskaiwanickaanna firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT gruszeckabeata firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT jamrozekjedlinskamaria firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT borawskaanna firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT hołdawaldemar firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT porowskaagnieszka firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT romanowiczagnieszka firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT hellmannandrzej firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT stellahołowieckabeata firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT deptałaandrzej firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 AT jurczakwojciech firstlinercvpversusrchopinductionimmunochemotherapyforindolentlymphomawithrituximabmaintenanceamulticentrephaseiiirandomizedstudybythepolishlymphomaresearchgroupplrg4 |