Cargando…

Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization

CONTEXT: Spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) concerns, for example, identification of spatial priorities for biodiversity conservation or for impact avoidance in economic development. Software useable for SCP include Marxan, C-Plan and Zonation. SCP is often based on data about the distributio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kukkala, Aija S., Moilanen, Atte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32336879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0446-y
_version_ 1783521895728021504
author Kukkala, Aija S.
Moilanen, Atte
author_facet Kukkala, Aija S.
Moilanen, Atte
author_sort Kukkala, Aija S.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) concerns, for example, identification of spatial priorities for biodiversity conservation or for impact avoidance in economic development. Software useable for SCP include Marxan, C-Plan and Zonation. SCP is often based on data about the distributions of biodiversity features (e.g., species, habitats), costs, threats, and/or ecosystem services (ES). OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: At simplest ES can be entered into a SCP analysis as independent supply maps, but this is not very satisfactory because connectivity requirements and consequent ideal spatial priority patterns may vary between ES. Therefore, we examine different ES and their connectivity requirements at the conceptual level. RESULTS: We find that the ideal spatial priority pattern for ES may differ in terms of: local supply area size and regional network requirements for the maintenance of ES provision, for flow between provision and demand, and with respect to the degree of dispersion that is needed for ES provision and access across different administrative regions. We then identify existing technical options in the Zonation software for dealing with such connectivity requirements of ES in SCP. CONCLUSIONS: This work helps users of SCP to improve how ES are accounted for in analysis together with biodiversity and other considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71547892020-04-23 Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization Kukkala, Aija S. Moilanen, Atte Landsc Ecol Perspective CONTEXT: Spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) concerns, for example, identification of spatial priorities for biodiversity conservation or for impact avoidance in economic development. Software useable for SCP include Marxan, C-Plan and Zonation. SCP is often based on data about the distributions of biodiversity features (e.g., species, habitats), costs, threats, and/or ecosystem services (ES). OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: At simplest ES can be entered into a SCP analysis as independent supply maps, but this is not very satisfactory because connectivity requirements and consequent ideal spatial priority patterns may vary between ES. Therefore, we examine different ES and their connectivity requirements at the conceptual level. RESULTS: We find that the ideal spatial priority pattern for ES may differ in terms of: local supply area size and regional network requirements for the maintenance of ES provision, for flow between provision and demand, and with respect to the degree of dispersion that is needed for ES provision and access across different administrative regions. We then identify existing technical options in the Zonation software for dealing with such connectivity requirements of ES in SCP. CONCLUSIONS: This work helps users of SCP to improve how ES are accounted for in analysis together with biodiversity and other considerations. Springer Netherlands 2016-09-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7154789/ /pubmed/32336879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0446-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Kukkala, Aija S.
Moilanen, Atte
Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title_full Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title_fullStr Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title_short Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
title_sort ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32336879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0446-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kukkalaaijas ecosystemservicesandconnectivityinspatialconservationprioritization
AT moilanenatte ecosystemservicesandconnectivityinspatialconservationprioritization