Cargando…

Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species

Environmental factors that drive carbon storage are often used as an explanation for alpine treeline formation. However, different tree species respond differently to environmental changes, which challenges our understanding of treeline formation and shifts. Therefore, we selected Picea jezoensis an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Hudong, He, Hongshi, Wu, Zhengfang, Cong, Yu, Zong, Shengwei, He, Jianan, Fu, Yuanyuan, Liu, Kai, Sun, Hang, Li, Yan, Yu, Changbao, Xu, Jindan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030384
_version_ 1783521898776231936
author Han, Hudong
He, Hongshi
Wu, Zhengfang
Cong, Yu
Zong, Shengwei
He, Jianan
Fu, Yuanyuan
Liu, Kai
Sun, Hang
Li, Yan
Yu, Changbao
Xu, Jindan
author_facet Han, Hudong
He, Hongshi
Wu, Zhengfang
Cong, Yu
Zong, Shengwei
He, Jianan
Fu, Yuanyuan
Liu, Kai
Sun, Hang
Li, Yan
Yu, Changbao
Xu, Jindan
author_sort Han, Hudong
collection PubMed
description Environmental factors that drive carbon storage are often used as an explanation for alpine treeline formation. However, different tree species respond differently to environmental changes, which challenges our understanding of treeline formation and shifts. Therefore, we selected Picea jezoensis and Betula ermanii, the two treeline species naturally occurring in Changbai Mountain in China, and measured the concentration of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), soluble sugars and starch in one-year-old leaves, shoots, stems and fine roots at different elevations. We found that compared with P. jezoensis, the NSC and soluble sugars concentrations of leaves and shoots of B. ermanii were higher than those of P. jezoensis, while the starch concentration of all the tissues were lower. Moreover, the concentration of NSC, soluble sugars and starch in the leaves of B. ermanii decreased with elevation. In addition, the starch concentration of B. ermanii shoots, stems and fine roots remained at a high level regardless of whether the soluble sugars concentration decreased. Whereas the concentrations of soluble sugars and starch in one-year-old leaves, shoots and stems of P. jezoensis responded similarly changes with elevation. These findings demonstrate that compared with P. jezoensis, B. ermanii has a higher soluble sugars/starch ratio, and its shoots, stems and fine roots actively store NSC to adapt to the harsh environment, which is one of the reasons that B. ermanii can be distributed at higher altitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71548032020-04-21 Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species Han, Hudong He, Hongshi Wu, Zhengfang Cong, Yu Zong, Shengwei He, Jianan Fu, Yuanyuan Liu, Kai Sun, Hang Li, Yan Yu, Changbao Xu, Jindan Plants (Basel) Article Environmental factors that drive carbon storage are often used as an explanation for alpine treeline formation. However, different tree species respond differently to environmental changes, which challenges our understanding of treeline formation and shifts. Therefore, we selected Picea jezoensis and Betula ermanii, the two treeline species naturally occurring in Changbai Mountain in China, and measured the concentration of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), soluble sugars and starch in one-year-old leaves, shoots, stems and fine roots at different elevations. We found that compared with P. jezoensis, the NSC and soluble sugars concentrations of leaves and shoots of B. ermanii were higher than those of P. jezoensis, while the starch concentration of all the tissues were lower. Moreover, the concentration of NSC, soluble sugars and starch in the leaves of B. ermanii decreased with elevation. In addition, the starch concentration of B. ermanii shoots, stems and fine roots remained at a high level regardless of whether the soluble sugars concentration decreased. Whereas the concentrations of soluble sugars and starch in one-year-old leaves, shoots and stems of P. jezoensis responded similarly changes with elevation. These findings demonstrate that compared with P. jezoensis, B. ermanii has a higher soluble sugars/starch ratio, and its shoots, stems and fine roots actively store NSC to adapt to the harsh environment, which is one of the reasons that B. ermanii can be distributed at higher altitudes. MDPI 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7154803/ /pubmed/32244958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030384 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Hudong
He, Hongshi
Wu, Zhengfang
Cong, Yu
Zong, Shengwei
He, Jianan
Fu, Yuanyuan
Liu, Kai
Sun, Hang
Li, Yan
Yu, Changbao
Xu, Jindan
Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title_full Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title_fullStr Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title_full_unstemmed Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title_short Non-Structural Carbohydrate Storage Strategy Explains the Spatial Distribution of Treeline Species
title_sort non-structural carbohydrate storage strategy explains the spatial distribution of treeline species
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030384
work_keys_str_mv AT hanhudong nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT hehongshi nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT wuzhengfang nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT congyu nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT zongshengwei nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT hejianan nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT fuyuanyuan nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT liukai nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT sunhang nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT liyan nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT yuchangbao nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies
AT xujindan nonstructuralcarbohydratestoragestrategyexplainsthespatialdistributionoftreelinespecies