Cargando…

Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis

The genus Chlorophytum includes many economically important species well-known for medicinal, ornamental, and horticultural values. However, to date, few molecular genomic resources have been reported for this genus. Therefore, there is limited knowledge of phylogenetic studies, and the available ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munyao, Jacinta N., Dong, Xiang, Yang, Jia-Xin, Mbandi, Elijah M., Wanga, Vincent O., Oulo, Millicent A., Saina, Josphat K., Musili, Paul M., Hu, Guang-Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030296
_version_ 1783521924363583488
author Munyao, Jacinta N.
Dong, Xiang
Yang, Jia-Xin
Mbandi, Elijah M.
Wanga, Vincent O.
Oulo, Millicent A.
Saina, Josphat K.
Musili, Paul M.
Hu, Guang-Wan
author_facet Munyao, Jacinta N.
Dong, Xiang
Yang, Jia-Xin
Mbandi, Elijah M.
Wanga, Vincent O.
Oulo, Millicent A.
Saina, Josphat K.
Musili, Paul M.
Hu, Guang-Wan
author_sort Munyao, Jacinta N.
collection PubMed
description The genus Chlorophytum includes many economically important species well-known for medicinal, ornamental, and horticultural values. However, to date, few molecular genomic resources have been reported for this genus. Therefore, there is limited knowledge of phylogenetic studies, and the available chloroplast (cp) genome of Chlorophytum (C. rhizopendulum) does not provide enough information on this genus. In this study, we present genomic resources for C. comosum and C. gallabatense, which had lengths of 154,248 and 154,154 base pairs (bp), respectively. They had a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) of 26,114 and 26,254 bp each in size, separating the large single-copy (LSC) region of 84,004 and 83,686 bp from the small single-copy (SSC) region of 18,016 and 17,960 bp in C. comosum and C. gallabatense, respectively. There were 112 distinct genes in each cp genome, which were comprised of 78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. The comparative analysis with five other selected species displayed a generally high level of sequence resemblance in structural organization, gene content, and arrangement. Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis confirmed the previous phylogeny and produced a phylogenetic tree with similar topology. It showed that the Chlorophytum species (C. comosum, C. gallabatense and C. rhizopendulum) were clustered together in the same clade with a closer relationship than other plants to the Anthericum ramosum. This research, therefore, presents valuable records for further molecular evolutionary and phylogenetic studies which help to fill the gap in genomic resources and resolve the taxonomic complexes of the genus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71549142020-04-21 Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis Munyao, Jacinta N. Dong, Xiang Yang, Jia-Xin Mbandi, Elijah M. Wanga, Vincent O. Oulo, Millicent A. Saina, Josphat K. Musili, Paul M. Hu, Guang-Wan Plants (Basel) Article The genus Chlorophytum includes many economically important species well-known for medicinal, ornamental, and horticultural values. However, to date, few molecular genomic resources have been reported for this genus. Therefore, there is limited knowledge of phylogenetic studies, and the available chloroplast (cp) genome of Chlorophytum (C. rhizopendulum) does not provide enough information on this genus. In this study, we present genomic resources for C. comosum and C. gallabatense, which had lengths of 154,248 and 154,154 base pairs (bp), respectively. They had a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) of 26,114 and 26,254 bp each in size, separating the large single-copy (LSC) region of 84,004 and 83,686 bp from the small single-copy (SSC) region of 18,016 and 17,960 bp in C. comosum and C. gallabatense, respectively. There were 112 distinct genes in each cp genome, which were comprised of 78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. The comparative analysis with five other selected species displayed a generally high level of sequence resemblance in structural organization, gene content, and arrangement. Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis confirmed the previous phylogeny and produced a phylogenetic tree with similar topology. It showed that the Chlorophytum species (C. comosum, C. gallabatense and C. rhizopendulum) were clustered together in the same clade with a closer relationship than other plants to the Anthericum ramosum. This research, therefore, presents valuable records for further molecular evolutionary and phylogenetic studies which help to fill the gap in genomic resources and resolve the taxonomic complexes of the genus. MDPI 2020-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7154914/ /pubmed/32121524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030296 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Munyao, Jacinta N.
Dong, Xiang
Yang, Jia-Xin
Mbandi, Elijah M.
Wanga, Vincent O.
Oulo, Millicent A.
Saina, Josphat K.
Musili, Paul M.
Hu, Guang-Wan
Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title_full Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title_fullStr Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title_short Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Chlorophytum comosum and Chlorophytum gallabatense: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis
title_sort complete chloroplast genomes of chlorophytum comosum and chlorophytum gallabatense: genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030296
work_keys_str_mv AT munyaojacintan completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT dongxiang completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT yangjiaxin completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT mbandielijahm completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT wangavincento completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT oulomillicenta completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT sainajosphatk completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT musilipaulm completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis
AT huguangwan completechloroplastgenomesofchlorophytumcomosumandchlorophytumgallabatensegenomestructurescomparativeandphylogeneticanalysis