Cargando…

What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?

Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is a widely used trait for hybrid seed production. Although male sterility is caused by S cytoplasm (male-sterility inducing mitochondria), the action of S cytoplasm is suppressed by restorer-of-fertility (Rf), a nuclear gene. Hence, the genetics of Rf has attained p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubo, Tomohiko, Arakawa, Takumi, Honma, Yujiro, Kitazaki, Kazuyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030361
_version_ 1783521927191592960
author Kubo, Tomohiko
Arakawa, Takumi
Honma, Yujiro
Kitazaki, Kazuyoshi
author_facet Kubo, Tomohiko
Arakawa, Takumi
Honma, Yujiro
Kitazaki, Kazuyoshi
author_sort Kubo, Tomohiko
collection PubMed
description Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is a widely used trait for hybrid seed production. Although male sterility is caused by S cytoplasm (male-sterility inducing mitochondria), the action of S cytoplasm is suppressed by restorer-of-fertility (Rf), a nuclear gene. Hence, the genetics of Rf has attained particular interest among plant breeders. The genetic model posits Rf diversity in which an Rf specifically suppresses the cognate S cytoplasm. Molecular analysis of Rf loci in plants has identified various genes; however, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein (a specific type of RNA-binding protein) is so prominent as the Rf-gene product that Rfs have been categorized into two classes, PPR and non-PPR. In contrast, several shared features between PPR- and some non-PPR Rfs are apparent, suggesting the possibility of another grouping. Our present focus is to group Rfs by molecular genetic classes other than the presence of PPRs. We propose three categories that define partially overlapping groups of Rfs: association with post-transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial gene expression, resistance gene-like copy number variation at the locus, and lack of a direct link to S-orf (a mitochondrial ORF associated with CMS). These groups appear to reflect their own evolutionary background and their mechanism of conferring S cytoplasm specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7154926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71549262020-04-21 What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply? Kubo, Tomohiko Arakawa, Takumi Honma, Yujiro Kitazaki, Kazuyoshi Plants (Basel) Review Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is a widely used trait for hybrid seed production. Although male sterility is caused by S cytoplasm (male-sterility inducing mitochondria), the action of S cytoplasm is suppressed by restorer-of-fertility (Rf), a nuclear gene. Hence, the genetics of Rf has attained particular interest among plant breeders. The genetic model posits Rf diversity in which an Rf specifically suppresses the cognate S cytoplasm. Molecular analysis of Rf loci in plants has identified various genes; however, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein (a specific type of RNA-binding protein) is so prominent as the Rf-gene product that Rfs have been categorized into two classes, PPR and non-PPR. In contrast, several shared features between PPR- and some non-PPR Rfs are apparent, suggesting the possibility of another grouping. Our present focus is to group Rfs by molecular genetic classes other than the presence of PPRs. We propose three categories that define partially overlapping groups of Rfs: association with post-transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial gene expression, resistance gene-like copy number variation at the locus, and lack of a direct link to S-orf (a mitochondrial ORF associated with CMS). These groups appear to reflect their own evolutionary background and their mechanism of conferring S cytoplasm specificity. MDPI 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7154926/ /pubmed/32182978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030361 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kubo, Tomohiko
Arakawa, Takumi
Honma, Yujiro
Kitazaki, Kazuyoshi
What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title_full What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title_fullStr What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title_full_unstemmed What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title_short What Does the Molecular Genetics of Different Types of Restorer-of-Fertility Genes Imply?
title_sort what does the molecular genetics of different types of restorer-of-fertility genes imply?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7154926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030361
work_keys_str_mv AT kubotomohiko whatdoesthemoleculargeneticsofdifferenttypesofrestoreroffertilitygenesimply
AT arakawatakumi whatdoesthemoleculargeneticsofdifferenttypesofrestoreroffertilitygenesimply
AT honmayujiro whatdoesthemoleculargeneticsofdifferenttypesofrestoreroffertilitygenesimply
AT kitazakikazuyoshi whatdoesthemoleculargeneticsofdifferenttypesofrestoreroffertilitygenesimply