Cargando…

Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily (q.d.) has demonstrated greater improvements in lung function, patient‐reported outcomes and lower exacerbation rates versus mono long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muro, Shigeo, Yoshisue, Hajime, Kostikas, Konstantinos, Olsson, Petter, Gupta, Pritam, Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.13651
_version_ 1783521954132656128
author Muro, Shigeo
Yoshisue, Hajime
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Olsson, Petter
Gupta, Pritam
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
author_facet Muro, Shigeo
Yoshisue, Hajime
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Olsson, Petter
Gupta, Pritam
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
author_sort Muro, Shigeo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily (q.d.) has demonstrated greater improvements in lung function, patient‐reported outcomes and lower exacerbation rates versus mono long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. However, data are limited on initial treatment with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. versus mono LAMA in COPD patients, not previously on maintenance treatment with long‐acting bronchodilators (LABD). METHODS: A pooled analysis of ARISE, SHINE and SPARK trials was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. versus open‐label (OL) tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg q.d. and GLY 50 μg q.d. in COPD patients, not on maintenance treatment with LABD at study entry (LABD‐naïve). Efficacy was assessed after 24/26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 998 LABD‐naïve patients were included (IND/GLY: 353; OL TIO: 328; GLY: 317). Patients treated with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. experienced greater improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) versus OL TIO 18 μg q.d. (least squares mean treatment difference (Δ): 0.086 L) and GLY 50 μg q.d. (Δ: 0.080 L) after 24/26 weeks. Improvements in electronic diary (eDiary) symptom scores, transition dyspnoea index (TDI) focal score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and rescue medication use were also greater with IND/GLY versus OL TIO and GLY. Greater proportion of patients achieved minimal clinically important difference in trough FEV(1), TDI and SGRQ with IND/GLY versus OL TIO and GLY. CONCLUSION: LABD‐naïve patients treated with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. achieved improvements in lung function, daily symptoms, dyspnoea, health‐related quality of life and rescue medication use versus those who received single LAMA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7155057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71550572020-04-15 Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis Muro, Shigeo Yoshisue, Hajime Kostikas, Konstantinos Olsson, Petter Gupta, Pritam Wedzicha, Jadwiga A. Respirology Original Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) 110/50 μg once daily (q.d.) has demonstrated greater improvements in lung function, patient‐reported outcomes and lower exacerbation rates versus mono long‐acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. However, data are limited on initial treatment with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. versus mono LAMA in COPD patients, not previously on maintenance treatment with long‐acting bronchodilators (LABD). METHODS: A pooled analysis of ARISE, SHINE and SPARK trials was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. versus open‐label (OL) tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg q.d. and GLY 50 μg q.d. in COPD patients, not on maintenance treatment with LABD at study entry (LABD‐naïve). Efficacy was assessed after 24/26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 998 LABD‐naïve patients were included (IND/GLY: 353; OL TIO: 328; GLY: 317). Patients treated with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. experienced greater improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) versus OL TIO 18 μg q.d. (least squares mean treatment difference (Δ): 0.086 L) and GLY 50 μg q.d. (Δ: 0.080 L) after 24/26 weeks. Improvements in electronic diary (eDiary) symptom scores, transition dyspnoea index (TDI) focal score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and rescue medication use were also greater with IND/GLY versus OL TIO and GLY. Greater proportion of patients achieved minimal clinically important difference in trough FEV(1), TDI and SGRQ with IND/GLY versus OL TIO and GLY. CONCLUSION: LABD‐naïve patients treated with IND/GLY 110/50 μg q.d. achieved improvements in lung function, daily symptoms, dyspnoea, health‐related quality of life and rescue medication use versus those who received single LAMA. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-07-24 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7155057/ /pubmed/31339215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.13651 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Muro, Shigeo
Yoshisue, Hajime
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Olsson, Petter
Gupta, Pritam
Wedzicha, Jadwiga A.
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title_full Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title_fullStr Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title_short Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis
title_sort indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long‐acting bronchodilator‐naïve copd patients: a pooled analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.13651
work_keys_str_mv AT muroshigeo indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis
AT yoshisuehajime indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis
AT kostikaskonstantinos indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis
AT olssonpetter indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis
AT guptapritam indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis
AT wedzichajadwigaa indacaterolglycopyrroniumversustiotropiumorglycopyrroniuminlongactingbronchodilatornaivecopdpatientsapooledanalysis