Cargando…

A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation

CCR4 is the sole receptor for the chemokines CCL22 and CCL17. Clinical studies of asthmatic airways have shown levels of both ligands and CCR4(+) Th2 cells to be elevated, suggestive of a role in disease. Consequently, CCR4 has aroused much interest as a potential therapeutic target and an understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Caroline A., Patel, Pallavi, Viney, Jonathan M., Phillips, Rhian M., Solari, Roberto, Pease, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.2A0120-089RR
_version_ 1783521957441961984
author Anderson, Caroline A.
Patel, Pallavi
Viney, Jonathan M.
Phillips, Rhian M.
Solari, Roberto
Pease, James E.
author_facet Anderson, Caroline A.
Patel, Pallavi
Viney, Jonathan M.
Phillips, Rhian M.
Solari, Roberto
Pease, James E.
author_sort Anderson, Caroline A.
collection PubMed
description CCR4 is the sole receptor for the chemokines CCL22 and CCL17. Clinical studies of asthmatic airways have shown levels of both ligands and CCR4(+) Th2 cells to be elevated, suggestive of a role in disease. Consequently, CCR4 has aroused much interest as a potential therapeutic target and an understanding of how its cell surface expression is regulated is highly desirable. To this end, receptor expression, receptor endocytosis, and chemotaxis were assessed using transfectants expressing CCR4, CCR4(+) human T cell lines, and human Th2 cells polarized in vitro. CCL17 and CCL22 drove rapid endocytosis of CCR4 in a dose‐dependent manner. Replenishment at the cell surface was slow and sensitive to cycloheximide, suggestive of de novo synthesis of CCR4. Constitutive CCR4 endocytosis was also observed, with the internalized CCR4 found to be significantly degraded over a 6‐h incubation. Truncation of the CCR4 C‐terminus by 40 amino acids had no effect on cell surface expression, but resulted in significant impairment of ligand‐induced endocytosis. Consequently, migration to both CCL17 and CCL22 was significantly enhanced. In contrast, truncation of CCR4 did not impair constitutive endocytosis or degradation, suggesting the use of alternative receptor motifs in these processes. We conclude that CCR4 cell surface levels are tightly regulated, with a degradative fate for endocytosed receptor. We postulate that this strict control is desirable, given that Th2 cells recruited by CCR4 can induce the further expression of CCR4 ligands in a positive feedback loop, thereby enhancing allergic inflammation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7155072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71550722020-04-15 A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation Anderson, Caroline A. Patel, Pallavi Viney, Jonathan M. Phillips, Rhian M. Solari, Roberto Pease, James E. J Leukoc Biol Receptors, Signal Transduction & Genes CCR4 is the sole receptor for the chemokines CCL22 and CCL17. Clinical studies of asthmatic airways have shown levels of both ligands and CCR4(+) Th2 cells to be elevated, suggestive of a role in disease. Consequently, CCR4 has aroused much interest as a potential therapeutic target and an understanding of how its cell surface expression is regulated is highly desirable. To this end, receptor expression, receptor endocytosis, and chemotaxis were assessed using transfectants expressing CCR4, CCR4(+) human T cell lines, and human Th2 cells polarized in vitro. CCL17 and CCL22 drove rapid endocytosis of CCR4 in a dose‐dependent manner. Replenishment at the cell surface was slow and sensitive to cycloheximide, suggestive of de novo synthesis of CCR4. Constitutive CCR4 endocytosis was also observed, with the internalized CCR4 found to be significantly degraded over a 6‐h incubation. Truncation of the CCR4 C‐terminus by 40 amino acids had no effect on cell surface expression, but resulted in significant impairment of ligand‐induced endocytosis. Consequently, migration to both CCL17 and CCL22 was significantly enhanced. In contrast, truncation of CCR4 did not impair constitutive endocytosis or degradation, suggesting the use of alternative receptor motifs in these processes. We conclude that CCR4 cell surface levels are tightly regulated, with a degradative fate for endocytosed receptor. We postulate that this strict control is desirable, given that Th2 cells recruited by CCR4 can induce the further expression of CCR4 ligands in a positive feedback loop, thereby enhancing allergic inflammation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-13 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7155072/ /pubmed/32052476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.2A0120-089RR Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Leukocyte Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Leukocyte Biology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Receptors, Signal Transduction & Genes
Anderson, Caroline A.
Patel, Pallavi
Viney, Jonathan M.
Phillips, Rhian M.
Solari, Roberto
Pease, James E.
A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title_full A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title_fullStr A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title_full_unstemmed A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title_short A degradatory fate for CCR4 suggests a primary role in Th2 inflammation
title_sort degradatory fate for ccr4 suggests a primary role in th2 inflammation
topic Receptors, Signal Transduction & Genes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.2A0120-089RR
work_keys_str_mv AT andersoncarolinea adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT patelpallavi adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT vineyjonathanm adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT phillipsrhianm adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT solariroberto adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT peasejamese adegradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT andersoncarolinea degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT patelpallavi degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT vineyjonathanm degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT phillipsrhianm degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT solariroberto degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation
AT peasejamese degradatoryfateforccr4suggestsaprimaryroleinth2inflammation