Cargando…

Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy of contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using different sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) doses to assess blood flow and perfusion in equine eyes and to evaluate safety of SF6 in horses. PROCEDURES: Ocular B‐mode and contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography were performed bilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blohm, Klaas‐Ole, Tichy, Alexander, Nell, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vop.12730
_version_ 1783521958356320256
author Blohm, Klaas‐Ole
Tichy, Alexander
Nell, Barbara
author_facet Blohm, Klaas‐Ole
Tichy, Alexander
Nell, Barbara
author_sort Blohm, Klaas‐Ole
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy of contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using different sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) doses to assess blood flow and perfusion in equine eyes and to evaluate safety of SF6 in horses. PROCEDURES: Ocular B‐mode and contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography were performed bilaterally in nine sedated university‐owned horses. Intravenous SonoVue® bolus injections of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mL were administered for 2/18, 5/18, 6/18, 3/18, 1/18, and 1/18 eyes, respectively. Doses were increased based on ascending bodyweight. Each eye within one horse was examined utilizing a different dose. Qualitative blood flow and quantitative perfusion were analyzed. Heart and respiratory rates were monitored nonsedated, sedated, and during first and second minutes of CEUS. RESULTS: Qualitative contrast enhancement (CE) was visible in 7/9 animals. Quantitative CE was measurable bilaterally in four horses, unilaterally in three individuals, and not detected in two animals. In all horses with unilateral CE, the positive eye received the higher dose. Fifteen mL dose resulted in significantly shorter time to peak than 10 mL (P < .05). Peak intensity, maximum signal increase, and corresponding area under the curve were significantly higher for 15 and 20 mL doses compared with 10 mL (P < .05). Uveal and retinal tissues were enhanced frequently. Twenty‐five and 30 mL doses revealed no CE. Only sedation reduced heart rates significantly (P < .05). Clinically relevant changes in respiratory rates or adverse reactions following SF6 application were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhancement was in most instances dose‐dependent. Fifteen mL appeared appropriate to assess equine ocular perfusion. The reliability in horses remains questionable; however, CEUS was well‐tolerated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7155076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71550762020-04-15 Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study Blohm, Klaas‐Ole Tichy, Alexander Nell, Barbara Vet Ophthalmol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy of contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using different sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) doses to assess blood flow and perfusion in equine eyes and to evaluate safety of SF6 in horses. PROCEDURES: Ocular B‐mode and contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography were performed bilaterally in nine sedated university‐owned horses. Intravenous SonoVue® bolus injections of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mL were administered for 2/18, 5/18, 6/18, 3/18, 1/18, and 1/18 eyes, respectively. Doses were increased based on ascending bodyweight. Each eye within one horse was examined utilizing a different dose. Qualitative blood flow and quantitative perfusion were analyzed. Heart and respiratory rates were monitored nonsedated, sedated, and during first and second minutes of CEUS. RESULTS: Qualitative contrast enhancement (CE) was visible in 7/9 animals. Quantitative CE was measurable bilaterally in four horses, unilaterally in three individuals, and not detected in two animals. In all horses with unilateral CE, the positive eye received the higher dose. Fifteen mL dose resulted in significantly shorter time to peak than 10 mL (P < .05). Peak intensity, maximum signal increase, and corresponding area under the curve were significantly higher for 15 and 20 mL doses compared with 10 mL (P < .05). Uveal and retinal tissues were enhanced frequently. Twenty‐five and 30 mL doses revealed no CE. Only sedation reduced heart rates significantly (P < .05). Clinically relevant changes in respiratory rates or adverse reactions following SF6 application were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhancement was in most instances dose‐dependent. Fifteen mL appeared appropriate to assess equine ocular perfusion. The reliability in horses remains questionable; however, CEUS was well‐tolerated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-04 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7155076/ /pubmed/31799804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vop.12730 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Ophthalmology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Blohm, Klaas‐Ole
Tichy, Alexander
Nell, Barbara
Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title_full Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title_fullStr Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title_short Clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: A pilot study
title_sort clinical utility, dose determination, and safety of ocular contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in horses: a pilot study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vop.12730
work_keys_str_mv AT blohmklaasole clinicalutilitydosedeterminationandsafetyofocularcontrastenhancedultrasonographyinhorsesapilotstudy
AT tichyalexander clinicalutilitydosedeterminationandsafetyofocularcontrastenhancedultrasonographyinhorsesapilotstudy
AT nellbarbara clinicalutilitydosedeterminationandsafetyofocularcontrastenhancedultrasonographyinhorsesapilotstudy