Cargando…
Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: With the increase in hospitalization of premature infants in emergency departments and the painful procedure in these sectors, appropriate methods of pain relief are required. This study aimed to compare the effect of oral dextrose and facilitated tucking in the reduction of pain during...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-2020-7 |
_version_ | 1783521998078476288 |
---|---|
author | Ranjbar, Athareh Bernstein, Colleen Shariat, Mamak Ranjbar, Hadi |
author_facet | Ranjbar, Athareh Bernstein, Colleen Shariat, Mamak Ranjbar, Hadi |
author_sort | Ranjbar, Athareh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the increase in hospitalization of premature infants in emergency departments and the painful procedure in these sectors, appropriate methods of pain relief are required. This study aimed to compare the effect of oral dextrose and facilitated tucking in the reduction of pain during heel sticks in premature infants and assess their effectiveness and feasibility for use in emergency settings. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial with cross-over design. Sixty infants were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Valiasr hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2015 to September 2016. They were randomly allocated into three groups (no pain relief method, oral dextrose and facilitated tucking). Six blood samples were collected by heel stick for each infant. Oral dextrose and facilitated tucking were compared with the routine method of blood sampling and pain was measured two times for each method. The pain scores was measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Repeated Measure ANOVA, ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc test were used with SPSS 16. RESULTS: The pain score’s increase during heel stick was significantly lower after using oral dextrose (3.58 ± 0.34) and facilitated tucking (5.58 ± 0.53) in comparison to the routine method (8.91 ± 0.18) of blood sampling (P < 0.001, η(2) = 0.971). Oral dextrose was more effective than facilitated tucking (P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 4.49). The emergency nurses rated oral dextrose as easier (t = 2.20, df = 118, p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.39) and more applicable method (t = 2.99, df = 118, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.54) for the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated tucking is an effective method of pain reduction which can be used in the absence of oral dextrose, in a situation in which it is contraindicated or in combination with oral dextrose. Based on the increase of infant’s admission in emergency department future studies are needed to identify the best method of pain reduction for procedures in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials IRCT201408029568N9, 2014-09-08. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7155270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71552702020-04-20 Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial Ranjbar, Athareh Bernstein, Colleen Shariat, Mamak Ranjbar, Hadi BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: With the increase in hospitalization of premature infants in emergency departments and the painful procedure in these sectors, appropriate methods of pain relief are required. This study aimed to compare the effect of oral dextrose and facilitated tucking in the reduction of pain during heel sticks in premature infants and assess their effectiveness and feasibility for use in emergency settings. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial with cross-over design. Sixty infants were recruited from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Valiasr hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2015 to September 2016. They were randomly allocated into three groups (no pain relief method, oral dextrose and facilitated tucking). Six blood samples were collected by heel stick for each infant. Oral dextrose and facilitated tucking were compared with the routine method of blood sampling and pain was measured two times for each method. The pain scores was measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Repeated Measure ANOVA, ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc test were used with SPSS 16. RESULTS: The pain score’s increase during heel stick was significantly lower after using oral dextrose (3.58 ± 0.34) and facilitated tucking (5.58 ± 0.53) in comparison to the routine method (8.91 ± 0.18) of blood sampling (P < 0.001, η(2) = 0.971). Oral dextrose was more effective than facilitated tucking (P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 4.49). The emergency nurses rated oral dextrose as easier (t = 2.20, df = 118, p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.39) and more applicable method (t = 2.99, df = 118, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.54) for the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated tucking is an effective method of pain reduction which can be used in the absence of oral dextrose, in a situation in which it is contraindicated or in combination with oral dextrose. Based on the increase of infant’s admission in emergency department future studies are needed to identify the best method of pain reduction for procedures in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials IRCT201408029568N9, 2014-09-08. BioMed Central 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7155270/ /pubmed/32290829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-2020-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ranjbar, Athareh Bernstein, Colleen Shariat, Mamak Ranjbar, Hadi Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title | Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of facilitated tucking and oral dextrose in reducing the pain of heel stick in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-2020-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranjbarathareh comparisonoffacilitatedtuckingandoraldextroseinreducingthepainofheelstickinpreterminfantsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bernsteincolleen comparisonoffacilitatedtuckingandoraldextroseinreducingthepainofheelstickinpreterminfantsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT shariatmamak comparisonoffacilitatedtuckingandoraldextroseinreducingthepainofheelstickinpreterminfantsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ranjbarhadi comparisonoffacilitatedtuckingandoraldextroseinreducingthepainofheelstickinpreterminfantsarandomizedclinicaltrial |