Cargando…

Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Emergency airway management may be required at any hospital location. Remote site management is associated with increased airway morbidity and mortality. Poor planning and interrupted workflow are significant contributors. Equipment may be unfamiliar, difficult to locate or inadequate. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schyma, Barry M., Wood, Andrew E., Sothisrihari, Saranga, Swinton, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00140-w
_version_ 1783522011941699584
author Schyma, Barry M.
Wood, Andrew E.
Sothisrihari, Saranga
Swinton, Paul
author_facet Schyma, Barry M.
Wood, Andrew E.
Sothisrihari, Saranga
Swinton, Paul
author_sort Schyma, Barry M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency airway management may be required at any hospital location. Remote site management is associated with increased airway morbidity and mortality. Poor planning and interrupted workflow are significant contributors. Equipment may be unfamiliar, difficult to locate or inadequate. The SCRAM (Structured CRitical Airway Management) bag aims to provide a portable, structured and reproducible approach to airway management preparation. We hypothesised that SCRAM bag use reduces equipment preparation time, the rate of error and operator cognitive load. METHODS: Fifty experienced anaesthetists were randomised into two groups and asked to prepare (kit dump) for and manage a simulated remote site difficult airway scenario. The control group (n = 25) used a standard resuscitation trolley while the experimental group used the SCRAM bag (n = 25). The primary outcome was time taken to kit dump completion (seconds). Secondary outcomes were the number of errors and self-reported difficulty (100 mm visual analogue scale). RESULTS: Using the SCRAM bag, a 29% reduction in kit dump time (111.7 ± 29.5 vs 156.7 ± 45.1, p = 0.0001) was noted. Participants using the SCRAM bag reported it to be less challenging to use (18.36 ± 16.4 mm vs 50.64 ± 22.9 mm, p < 0.001), and significantly fewer errors were noted (1 (IQR 1–3) vs 8 (IQR 5–9), p = 0.03) (87.5% reduction in the total number of errors). CONCLUSION: The SCRAM bag facilitates a quicker, less challenging kit dump with significantly fewer errors. We propose that this would reduce delay to airway management, reduce cognitive load and provide an improved capability to manage anticipated and unanticipated airway events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7155334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71553342020-04-20 Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial Schyma, Barry M. Wood, Andrew E. Sothisrihari, Saranga Swinton, Paul Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Emergency airway management may be required at any hospital location. Remote site management is associated with increased airway morbidity and mortality. Poor planning and interrupted workflow are significant contributors. Equipment may be unfamiliar, difficult to locate or inadequate. The SCRAM (Structured CRitical Airway Management) bag aims to provide a portable, structured and reproducible approach to airway management preparation. We hypothesised that SCRAM bag use reduces equipment preparation time, the rate of error and operator cognitive load. METHODS: Fifty experienced anaesthetists were randomised into two groups and asked to prepare (kit dump) for and manage a simulated remote site difficult airway scenario. The control group (n = 25) used a standard resuscitation trolley while the experimental group used the SCRAM bag (n = 25). The primary outcome was time taken to kit dump completion (seconds). Secondary outcomes were the number of errors and self-reported difficulty (100 mm visual analogue scale). RESULTS: Using the SCRAM bag, a 29% reduction in kit dump time (111.7 ± 29.5 vs 156.7 ± 45.1, p = 0.0001) was noted. Participants using the SCRAM bag reported it to be less challenging to use (18.36 ± 16.4 mm vs 50.64 ± 22.9 mm, p < 0.001), and significantly fewer errors were noted (1 (IQR 1–3) vs 8 (IQR 5–9), p = 0.03) (87.5% reduction in the total number of errors). CONCLUSION: The SCRAM bag facilitates a quicker, less challenging kit dump with significantly fewer errors. We propose that this would reduce delay to airway management, reduce cognitive load and provide an improved capability to manage anticipated and unanticipated airway events. BioMed Central 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7155334/ /pubmed/32313649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00140-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schyma, Barry M.
Wood, Andrew E.
Sothisrihari, Saranga
Swinton, Paul
Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title_full Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title_short Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag—a randomised controlled trial
title_sort optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the scram bag—a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00140-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schymabarrym optimisingremotesiteairwaymanagementkitdumpusingthescrambagarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woodandrewe optimisingremotesiteairwaymanagementkitdumpusingthescrambagarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sothisriharisaranga optimisingremotesiteairwaymanagementkitdumpusingthescrambagarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT swintonpaul optimisingremotesiteairwaymanagementkitdumpusingthescrambagarandomisedcontrolledtrial