Cargando…

Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures

Penile urethral strictures have been managed by a staged surgical approach. In selected cases, spongiofibrosis can be excised, a neo-urethral plate created using buccal mucosa graft (BMG) and tubularized during the same procedure, performing a “two-in-one” stage approach. We aim to identify strictur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos-Juanatey, Felix, Bugeja, Simon, Dragova, Mariya, Frost, Anastasia V, Ivaz, Stella L, Andrich, Daniela E, Mundy, Anthony R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441450
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_78_19
_version_ 1783522108831170560
author Campos-Juanatey, Felix
Bugeja, Simon
Dragova, Mariya
Frost, Anastasia V
Ivaz, Stella L
Andrich, Daniela E
Mundy, Anthony R
author_facet Campos-Juanatey, Felix
Bugeja, Simon
Dragova, Mariya
Frost, Anastasia V
Ivaz, Stella L
Andrich, Daniela E
Mundy, Anthony R
author_sort Campos-Juanatey, Felix
collection PubMed
description Penile urethral strictures have been managed by a staged surgical approach. In selected cases, spongiofibrosis can be excised, a neo-urethral plate created using buccal mucosa graft (BMG) and tubularized during the same procedure, performing a “two-in-one” stage approach. We aim to identify stricture factors which indicate suitability for this two-in-one stage approach. We assess surgical outcome and compare with staged reconstruction. We conducted an observational descriptive study. The data were prospectively collected from two-in-one stage and staged penile urethroplasties using BMG in a single center between 2007 and 2017. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Outcomes were assessed clinically, radiologically, and by flow-rate analysis. Failure was defined as recurrent stricture or any subsequent surgical or endoscopic intervention. Descriptive analysis of stricture characteristics and statistical comparison was made between groups. Of 425 penile urethroplasties, 139 met the inclusion criteria: 59 two-in-one stage and 80 staged. The mean stricture length was 2.8 cm (single stage) and 4.5 cm (staged). Etiology was lichen sclerosus (LS) 52.5% (single stage) and 73.8% hypospadias related (staged). 40.7% of patients had previous failed urethroplasties in the single-stage group and 81.2% in the staged. The most common stricture locations were navicular fossa (39.0%) and distal penile urethra (59.3%) in the single-stage group and mid or proximal penile urethra (58.7%) in the staged group. Success rates were 89.8% (single stage) and 81.3% (staged). A trend toward a single-stage approach for select penile urethral strictures was noted. We conclude that a single-stage substitution penile urethroplasty using BMG as a “two-in-one” approach is associated with excellent functional outcomes. The most suitable strictures for this approach are distal, primary, and LS-related strictures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7155792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71557922020-04-21 Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures Campos-Juanatey, Felix Bugeja, Simon Dragova, Mariya Frost, Anastasia V Ivaz, Stella L Andrich, Daniela E Mundy, Anthony R Asian J Androl Invited Original Article Penile urethral strictures have been managed by a staged surgical approach. In selected cases, spongiofibrosis can be excised, a neo-urethral plate created using buccal mucosa graft (BMG) and tubularized during the same procedure, performing a “two-in-one” stage approach. We aim to identify stricture factors which indicate suitability for this two-in-one stage approach. We assess surgical outcome and compare with staged reconstruction. We conducted an observational descriptive study. The data were prospectively collected from two-in-one stage and staged penile urethroplasties using BMG in a single center between 2007 and 2017. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Outcomes were assessed clinically, radiologically, and by flow-rate analysis. Failure was defined as recurrent stricture or any subsequent surgical or endoscopic intervention. Descriptive analysis of stricture characteristics and statistical comparison was made between groups. Of 425 penile urethroplasties, 139 met the inclusion criteria: 59 two-in-one stage and 80 staged. The mean stricture length was 2.8 cm (single stage) and 4.5 cm (staged). Etiology was lichen sclerosus (LS) 52.5% (single stage) and 73.8% hypospadias related (staged). 40.7% of patients had previous failed urethroplasties in the single-stage group and 81.2% in the staged. The most common stricture locations were navicular fossa (39.0%) and distal penile urethra (59.3%) in the single-stage group and mid or proximal penile urethra (58.7%) in the staged group. Success rates were 89.8% (single stage) and 81.3% (staged). A trend toward a single-stage approach for select penile urethral strictures was noted. We conclude that a single-stage substitution penile urethroplasty using BMG as a “two-in-one” approach is associated with excellent functional outcomes. The most suitable strictures for this approach are distal, primary, and LS-related strictures. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7155792/ /pubmed/31441450 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_78_19 Text en Copyright: ©The Author(s)(2019) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Invited Original Article
Campos-Juanatey, Felix
Bugeja, Simon
Dragova, Mariya
Frost, Anastasia V
Ivaz, Stella L
Andrich, Daniela E
Mundy, Anthony R
Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title_full Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title_fullStr Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title_full_unstemmed Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title_short Single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
title_sort single-stage tubular urethral reconstruction using oral grafts is an alternative to classical staged approach for selected penile urethral strictures
topic Invited Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7155792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441450
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_78_19
work_keys_str_mv AT camposjuanateyfelix singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT bugejasimon singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT dragovamariya singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT frostanastasiav singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT ivazstellal singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT andrichdanielae singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures
AT mundyanthonyr singlestagetubularurethralreconstructionusingoralgraftsisanalternativetoclassicalstagedapproachforselectedpenileurethralstrictures