Cargando…

Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology

Many theoretical models predict when genetic evolution and phenotypic plasticity allow adaptation to changing environmental conditions. These models generally assume stabilizing selection around some optimal phenotype. We however often ignore how optimal phenotypes change with the environment, which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gauzere, Julie, Teuf, Bertrand, Davi, Hendrik, Chevin, Luis‐Miguel, Caignard, Thomas, Leys, Bérangère, Delzon, Sylvain, Ronce, Ophélie, Chuine, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.160
_version_ 1783522151888846848
author Gauzere, Julie
Teuf, Bertrand
Davi, Hendrik
Chevin, Luis‐Miguel
Caignard, Thomas
Leys, Bérangère
Delzon, Sylvain
Ronce, Ophélie
Chuine, Isabelle
author_facet Gauzere, Julie
Teuf, Bertrand
Davi, Hendrik
Chevin, Luis‐Miguel
Caignard, Thomas
Leys, Bérangère
Delzon, Sylvain
Ronce, Ophélie
Chuine, Isabelle
author_sort Gauzere, Julie
collection PubMed
description Many theoretical models predict when genetic evolution and phenotypic plasticity allow adaptation to changing environmental conditions. These models generally assume stabilizing selection around some optimal phenotype. We however often ignore how optimal phenotypes change with the environment, which limit our understanding of the adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity. Here, we propose an approach based on our knowledge of the causal relationships between climate, adaptive traits, and fitness to further these questions. This approach relies on a sensitivity analysis of the process‐based model phenofit, which mathematically formalizes these causal relationships, to predict fitness landscapes and optimal budburst dates along elevation gradients in three major European tree species. Variation in the overall shape of the fitness landscape and resulting directional selection gradients were found to be mainly driven by temperature variation. The optimal budburst date was delayed with elevation, while the range of dates allowing high fitness narrowed and the maximal fitness at the optimum decreased. We also found that the plasticity of the budburst date should allow tracking the spatial variation in the optimal date, but with variable mismatch depending on the species, ranging from negligible mismatch in fir, moderate in beech, to large in oak. Phenotypic plasticity would therefore be more adaptive in fir and beech than in oak. In all species, we predicted stronger directional selection for earlier budburst date at higher elevation. The weak selection on budburst date in fir should result in the evolution of negligible genetic divergence, while beech and oak would evolve counter‐gradient variation, where genetic and environmental effects are in opposite directions. Our study suggests that theoretical models should consider how whole fitness landscapes change with the environment. The approach introduced here has the potential to be developed for other traits and species to explore how populations will adapt to climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7156102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71561022020-04-20 Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology Gauzere, Julie Teuf, Bertrand Davi, Hendrik Chevin, Luis‐Miguel Caignard, Thomas Leys, Bérangère Delzon, Sylvain Ronce, Ophélie Chuine, Isabelle Evol Lett Letters Many theoretical models predict when genetic evolution and phenotypic plasticity allow adaptation to changing environmental conditions. These models generally assume stabilizing selection around some optimal phenotype. We however often ignore how optimal phenotypes change with the environment, which limit our understanding of the adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity. Here, we propose an approach based on our knowledge of the causal relationships between climate, adaptive traits, and fitness to further these questions. This approach relies on a sensitivity analysis of the process‐based model phenofit, which mathematically formalizes these causal relationships, to predict fitness landscapes and optimal budburst dates along elevation gradients in three major European tree species. Variation in the overall shape of the fitness landscape and resulting directional selection gradients were found to be mainly driven by temperature variation. The optimal budburst date was delayed with elevation, while the range of dates allowing high fitness narrowed and the maximal fitness at the optimum decreased. We also found that the plasticity of the budburst date should allow tracking the spatial variation in the optimal date, but with variable mismatch depending on the species, ranging from negligible mismatch in fir, moderate in beech, to large in oak. Phenotypic plasticity would therefore be more adaptive in fir and beech than in oak. In all species, we predicted stronger directional selection for earlier budburst date at higher elevation. The weak selection on budburst date in fir should result in the evolution of negligible genetic divergence, while beech and oak would evolve counter‐gradient variation, where genetic and environmental effects are in opposite directions. Our study suggests that theoretical models should consider how whole fitness landscapes change with the environment. The approach introduced here has the potential to be developed for other traits and species to explore how populations will adapt to climate change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7156102/ /pubmed/32313687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.160 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Gauzere, Julie
Teuf, Bertrand
Davi, Hendrik
Chevin, Luis‐Miguel
Caignard, Thomas
Leys, Bérangère
Delzon, Sylvain
Ronce, Ophélie
Chuine, Isabelle
Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title_full Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title_fullStr Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title_full_unstemmed Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title_short Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology
title_sort where is the optimum? predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. a case study on tree phenology
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.160
work_keys_str_mv AT gauzerejulie whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT teufbertrand whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT davihendrik whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT chevinluismiguel whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT caignardthomas whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT leysberangere whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT delzonsylvain whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT ronceophelie whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology
AT chuineisabelle whereistheoptimumpredictingthevariationofselectionalongclimaticgradientsandtheadaptivevalueofplasticityacasestudyontreephenology