Cargando…
Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA
Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.165 |
_version_ | 1783522152362803200 |
---|---|
author | Dehasque, Marianne Ávila‐Arcos, María C. Díez‐del‐Molino, David Fumagalli, Matteo Guschanski, Katerina Lorenzen, Eline D. Malaspinas, Anna‐Sapfo Marques‐Bonet, Tomas Martin, Michael D. Murray, Gemma G. R. Papadopulos, Alexander S. T. Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard Wegmann, Daniel Dalén, Love Foote, Andrew D. |
author_facet | Dehasque, Marianne Ávila‐Arcos, María C. Díez‐del‐Molino, David Fumagalli, Matteo Guschanski, Katerina Lorenzen, Eline D. Malaspinas, Anna‐Sapfo Marques‐Bonet, Tomas Martin, Michael D. Murray, Gemma G. R. Papadopulos, Alexander S. T. Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard Wegmann, Daniel Dalén, Love Foote, Andrew D. |
author_sort | Dehasque, Marianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced samples can inform about past selection processes, as time series data allow direct quantification of population parameters collected before, during, and after genetic changes driven by selection. In this Comment and Opinion, we advocate for the inclusion of temporal sampling and the generation of paleogenomic datasets in evolutionary biology, and highlight some of the recent advances that have yet to be broadly applied by evolutionary biologists. In doing so, we consider the expected signatures of balancing, purifying, and positive selection in time series data, and detail how this can advance our understanding of the chronology and tempo of genomic change driven by selection. However, we also recognize the limitations of such data, which can suffer from postmortem damage, fragmentation, low coverage, and typically low sample size. We therefore highlight the many assumptions and considerations associated with analyzing paleogenomic data and the assumptions associated with analytical methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7156104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71561042020-04-20 Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA Dehasque, Marianne Ávila‐Arcos, María C. Díez‐del‐Molino, David Fumagalli, Matteo Guschanski, Katerina Lorenzen, Eline D. Malaspinas, Anna‐Sapfo Marques‐Bonet, Tomas Martin, Michael D. Murray, Gemma G. R. Papadopulos, Alexander S. T. Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard Wegmann, Daniel Dalén, Love Foote, Andrew D. Evol Lett Comments and Opinions Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced samples can inform about past selection processes, as time series data allow direct quantification of population parameters collected before, during, and after genetic changes driven by selection. In this Comment and Opinion, we advocate for the inclusion of temporal sampling and the generation of paleogenomic datasets in evolutionary biology, and highlight some of the recent advances that have yet to be broadly applied by evolutionary biologists. In doing so, we consider the expected signatures of balancing, purifying, and positive selection in time series data, and detail how this can advance our understanding of the chronology and tempo of genomic change driven by selection. However, we also recognize the limitations of such data, which can suffer from postmortem damage, fragmentation, low coverage, and typically low sample size. We therefore highlight the many assumptions and considerations associated with analyzing paleogenomic data and the assumptions associated with analytical methods. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7156104/ /pubmed/32313686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.165 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Comments and Opinions Dehasque, Marianne Ávila‐Arcos, María C. Díez‐del‐Molino, David Fumagalli, Matteo Guschanski, Katerina Lorenzen, Eline D. Malaspinas, Anna‐Sapfo Marques‐Bonet, Tomas Martin, Michael D. Murray, Gemma G. R. Papadopulos, Alexander S. T. Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard Wegmann, Daniel Dalén, Love Foote, Andrew D. Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title | Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title_full | Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title_fullStr | Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title_short | Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA |
title_sort | inference of natural selection from ancient dna |
topic | Comments and Opinions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehasquemarianne inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT avilaarcosmariac inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT diezdelmolinodavid inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT fumagallimatteo inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT guschanskikaterina inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT lorenzenelined inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT malaspinasannasapfo inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT marquesbonettomas inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT martinmichaeld inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT murraygemmagr inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT papadopulosalexanderst inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT therkildsenninaovergaard inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT wegmanndaniel inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT dalenlove inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna AT footeandrewd inferenceofnaturalselectionfromancientdna |