Cargando…

Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and functional outcomes of the trifocal 1stQ AddOn(®) (Medicontur) supplementary intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed for implantation into the ciliary sulcus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 18 eyes of 11 pseudophakic patients with uncomplicated previous i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palomino-Bautista, Carlos, Sánchez-Jean, Rubén, Carmona Gonzalez, David, Romero Domínguez, Marta, Castillo Gómez, Alfredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238553
_version_ 1783522179361538048
author Palomino-Bautista, Carlos
Sánchez-Jean, Rubén
Carmona Gonzalez, David
Romero Domínguez, Marta
Castillo Gómez, Alfredo
author_facet Palomino-Bautista, Carlos
Sánchez-Jean, Rubén
Carmona Gonzalez, David
Romero Domínguez, Marta
Castillo Gómez, Alfredo
author_sort Palomino-Bautista, Carlos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and functional outcomes of the trifocal 1stQ AddOn(®) (Medicontur) supplementary intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed for implantation into the ciliary sulcus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 18 eyes of 11 pseudophakic patients with uncomplicated previous implantation of monofocal capsular bag IOLs. These patients had a desire for spectacle independence. Distance, intermediate and near visual acuities were measured, and defocus curves were plotted over a period of 6 months following implantation of the add-on IOLs. Intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density measurements and biomicroscopic evaluation were also performed. RESULTS: In this study, 83.3% of eyes had spherical refractions within ±0.5 D from emetropia and 100% of eyes had spherical equivalent refractions that were within ±1.0 D of the target refraction. Visual acuities and defocus curves clearly confirmed trifocal optical performance (UDVA=0.03 ±0.05; UIVA=0.21 ±0.04; UNVA=0.12 ±0.04 logMAR; expressed as mean ±SD). Depth of focus showed identical results (DOF=0.486 D) compared to a trifocal capsular bag IOL, while the defocus curve was found to be superior in the intermediate and near ranges when compared to a trifocal capsular bag IOL. All patients achieved spectacle independence at all distances. All add-on IOLs were well positioned in the ciliary sulcus. No negative changes were noted in connection with endothelial cell counts, IOPs, the angle structure during surgery and during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The supplementary trifocal add-on IOL seems to be a safe, efficient and stable solution for achieving spectacle independence in pseudophakic patients with monofocal primary IOLs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7156274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71562742020-04-17 Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens Palomino-Bautista, Carlos Sánchez-Jean, Rubén Carmona Gonzalez, David Romero Domínguez, Marta Castillo Gómez, Alfredo Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and functional outcomes of the trifocal 1stQ AddOn(®) (Medicontur) supplementary intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed for implantation into the ciliary sulcus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 18 eyes of 11 pseudophakic patients with uncomplicated previous implantation of monofocal capsular bag IOLs. These patients had a desire for spectacle independence. Distance, intermediate and near visual acuities were measured, and defocus curves were plotted over a period of 6 months following implantation of the add-on IOLs. Intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density measurements and biomicroscopic evaluation were also performed. RESULTS: In this study, 83.3% of eyes had spherical refractions within ±0.5 D from emetropia and 100% of eyes had spherical equivalent refractions that were within ±1.0 D of the target refraction. Visual acuities and defocus curves clearly confirmed trifocal optical performance (UDVA=0.03 ±0.05; UIVA=0.21 ±0.04; UNVA=0.12 ±0.04 logMAR; expressed as mean ±SD). Depth of focus showed identical results (DOF=0.486 D) compared to a trifocal capsular bag IOL, while the defocus curve was found to be superior in the intermediate and near ranges when compared to a trifocal capsular bag IOL. All patients achieved spectacle independence at all distances. All add-on IOLs were well positioned in the ciliary sulcus. No negative changes were noted in connection with endothelial cell counts, IOPs, the angle structure during surgery and during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The supplementary trifocal add-on IOL seems to be a safe, efficient and stable solution for achieving spectacle independence in pseudophakic patients with monofocal primary IOLs. Dove 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7156274/ /pubmed/32308364 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238553 Text en © 2020 Palomino-Bautista et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Palomino-Bautista, Carlos
Sánchez-Jean, Rubén
Carmona Gonzalez, David
Romero Domínguez, Marta
Castillo Gómez, Alfredo
Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title_full Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title_fullStr Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title_full_unstemmed Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title_short Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients – Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens
title_sort spectacle independence for pseudophakic patients – experience with a trifocal supplementary add-on intraocular lens
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238553
work_keys_str_mv AT palominobautistacarlos spectacleindependenceforpseudophakicpatientsexperiencewithatrifocalsupplementaryaddonintraocularlens
AT sanchezjeanruben spectacleindependenceforpseudophakicpatientsexperiencewithatrifocalsupplementaryaddonintraocularlens
AT carmonagonzalezdavid spectacleindependenceforpseudophakicpatientsexperiencewithatrifocalsupplementaryaddonintraocularlens
AT romerodominguezmarta spectacleindependenceforpseudophakicpatientsexperiencewithatrifocalsupplementaryaddonintraocularlens
AT castillogomezalfredo spectacleindependenceforpseudophakicpatientsexperiencewithatrifocalsupplementaryaddonintraocularlens