Cargando…

Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing

It has been demonstrated that, while otherwise detrimental, noise can improve sensory perception under optimal conditions. The mechanism underlying this improvement is stochastic resonance. An inverted U-shaped relationship between noise level and task performance is considered as the signature of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rufener, Katharina S., Kauk, Julian, Ruhnau, Philipp, Repplinger, Stefan, Heil, Peter, Zaehle, Tino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32286448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63332-w
_version_ 1783522190177599488
author Rufener, Katharina S.
Kauk, Julian
Ruhnau, Philipp
Repplinger, Stefan
Heil, Peter
Zaehle, Tino
author_facet Rufener, Katharina S.
Kauk, Julian
Ruhnau, Philipp
Repplinger, Stefan
Heil, Peter
Zaehle, Tino
author_sort Rufener, Katharina S.
collection PubMed
description It has been demonstrated that, while otherwise detrimental, noise can improve sensory perception under optimal conditions. The mechanism underlying this improvement is stochastic resonance. An inverted U-shaped relationship between noise level and task performance is considered as the signature of stochastic resonance. Previous studies have proposed the existence of stochastic resonance also in the human auditory system. However, the reported beneficial effects of noise are small, based on a small sample, and do not confirm the proposed inverted U-shaped function. Here, we investigated in two separate studies whether stochastic resonance may be present in the human auditory system by applying noise of different levels, either acoustically or electrically via transcranial random noise stimulation, while participants had to detect acoustic stimuli adjusted to their individual hearing threshold. We find no evidence for behaviorally relevant effects of stochastic resonance. Although detection rate for near-threshold acoustic stimuli appears to vary in an inverted U-shaped manner for some subjects, it varies in a U-shaped manner or in other manners for other subjects. Our results show that subjects do not benefit from noise, irrespective of its modality. In conclusion, our results question the existence of stochastic resonance in the human auditory system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7156366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71563662020-04-19 Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing Rufener, Katharina S. Kauk, Julian Ruhnau, Philipp Repplinger, Stefan Heil, Peter Zaehle, Tino Sci Rep Article It has been demonstrated that, while otherwise detrimental, noise can improve sensory perception under optimal conditions. The mechanism underlying this improvement is stochastic resonance. An inverted U-shaped relationship between noise level and task performance is considered as the signature of stochastic resonance. Previous studies have proposed the existence of stochastic resonance also in the human auditory system. However, the reported beneficial effects of noise are small, based on a small sample, and do not confirm the proposed inverted U-shaped function. Here, we investigated in two separate studies whether stochastic resonance may be present in the human auditory system by applying noise of different levels, either acoustically or electrically via transcranial random noise stimulation, while participants had to detect acoustic stimuli adjusted to their individual hearing threshold. We find no evidence for behaviorally relevant effects of stochastic resonance. Although detection rate for near-threshold acoustic stimuli appears to vary in an inverted U-shaped manner for some subjects, it varies in a U-shaped manner or in other manners for other subjects. Our results show that subjects do not benefit from noise, irrespective of its modality. In conclusion, our results question the existence of stochastic resonance in the human auditory system. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7156366/ /pubmed/32286448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63332-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rufener, Katharina S.
Kauk, Julian
Ruhnau, Philipp
Repplinger, Stefan
Heil, Peter
Zaehle, Tino
Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title_full Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title_fullStr Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title_short Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
title_sort inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32286448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63332-w
work_keys_str_mv AT rufenerkatharinas inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing
AT kaukjulian inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing
AT ruhnauphilipp inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing
AT repplingerstefan inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing
AT heilpeter inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing
AT zaehletino inconsistenteffectsofstochasticresonanceonhumanauditoryprocessing