Cargando…

Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the human abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective histamine 3 (H(3))-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy. METHODS: Nondependent, rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setnik, Beatrice, McDonnell, Michael, Mills, Catherine, Scart-Grès, Catherine, Robert, Philippe, Dayno, Jeffrey M, Schwartz, Jean-Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz252
_version_ 1783522327016767488
author Setnik, Beatrice
McDonnell, Michael
Mills, Catherine
Scart-Grès, Catherine
Robert, Philippe
Dayno, Jeffrey M
Schwartz, Jean-Charles
author_facet Setnik, Beatrice
McDonnell, Michael
Mills, Catherine
Scart-Grès, Catherine
Robert, Philippe
Dayno, Jeffrey M
Schwartz, Jean-Charles
author_sort Setnik, Beatrice
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the human abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective histamine 3 (H(3))-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy. METHODS: Nondependent, recreational stimulant users able to distinguish phentermine HCl 60 mg from placebo in a drug discrimination test were randomized in a four-period, double-blind, crossover design to receive single doses of pitolisant 35.6 mg (therapeutic dose), pitolisant 213.6 mg (supratherapeutic dose), phentermine HCl 60 mg, and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum effect (E(max)) on the 100-point Drug Liking (“at this moment”) visual analog scale. RESULTS: In 38 study completers (73.7% male; 65.8% white; mean age, 33.3 years), mean Drug Liking E(max) was significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant 35.6 mg (mean difference, 21.4; p < 0.0001) and pitolisant 213.6 mg (mean difference, 19.7; p < 0.0001). Drug Liking E(max) was similar for pitolisant (both doses) and placebo. Similarly, for key secondary measures of Overall Drug Liking and willingness to Take Drug Again, mean E(max) scores were significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant (both doses) and similar for pitolisant (both doses) versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events was 82.1% after phentermine HCl 60 mg, 72.5% after pitolisant 213.6 mg, 47.5% after pitolisant 35.6 mg, and 48.8% after placebo administration. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pitolisant demonstrated significantly lower potential for abuse compared with phentermine and an overall profile similar to placebo; this suggests a low risk of abuse for pitolisant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03152123. Determination of the abuse potential of pitolisant in healthy, nondependent recreational stimulant users. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03152123.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7157189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71571892020-04-20 Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy Setnik, Beatrice McDonnell, Michael Mills, Catherine Scart-Grès, Catherine Robert, Philippe Dayno, Jeffrey M Schwartz, Jean-Charles Sleep Neurological Disorders OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the human abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective histamine 3 (H(3))-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy. METHODS: Nondependent, recreational stimulant users able to distinguish phentermine HCl 60 mg from placebo in a drug discrimination test were randomized in a four-period, double-blind, crossover design to receive single doses of pitolisant 35.6 mg (therapeutic dose), pitolisant 213.6 mg (supratherapeutic dose), phentermine HCl 60 mg, and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum effect (E(max)) on the 100-point Drug Liking (“at this moment”) visual analog scale. RESULTS: In 38 study completers (73.7% male; 65.8% white; mean age, 33.3 years), mean Drug Liking E(max) was significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant 35.6 mg (mean difference, 21.4; p < 0.0001) and pitolisant 213.6 mg (mean difference, 19.7; p < 0.0001). Drug Liking E(max) was similar for pitolisant (both doses) and placebo. Similarly, for key secondary measures of Overall Drug Liking and willingness to Take Drug Again, mean E(max) scores were significantly greater for phentermine versus pitolisant (both doses) and similar for pitolisant (both doses) versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events was 82.1% after phentermine HCl 60 mg, 72.5% after pitolisant 213.6 mg, 47.5% after pitolisant 35.6 mg, and 48.8% after placebo administration. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pitolisant demonstrated significantly lower potential for abuse compared with phentermine and an overall profile similar to placebo; this suggests a low risk of abuse for pitolisant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03152123. Determination of the abuse potential of pitolisant in healthy, nondependent recreational stimulant users. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03152123. Oxford University Press 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7157189/ /pubmed/31626696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz252 Text en © Sleep Research Society 2019. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Sleep Research Society]. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Neurological Disorders
Setnik, Beatrice
McDonnell, Michael
Mills, Catherine
Scart-Grès, Catherine
Robert, Philippe
Dayno, Jeffrey M
Schwartz, Jean-Charles
Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title_full Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title_short Evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective H(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
title_sort evaluation of the abuse potential of pitolisant, a selective h(3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, for the treatment of adult patients with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy
topic Neurological Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31626696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz252
work_keys_str_mv AT setnikbeatrice evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT mcdonnellmichael evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT millscatherine evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT scartgrescatherine evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT robertphilippe evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT daynojeffreym evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy
AT schwartzjeancharles evaluationoftheabusepotentialofpitolisantaselectiveh3receptorantagonistinverseagonistforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithnarcolepsywithorwithoutcataplexy