Cargando…
Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada
BACKGROUND: For novel cancer treatments, effectiveness in clinical practice is not always aligned with clinical efficacy results. As such it is important to understand a treatment’s real-world effectiveness. We examined real-world population-based comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06798-1 |
_version_ | 1783522472909340672 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn M. Croxford, Ruth Isaranawatchai, Wanrudee Menjak, Ines B. Petrella, Teresa M. Mittmann, Nicole Earle, Craig C. Gavura, Scott Hanna, Timothy P. Chan, Kelvin K.W. |
author_facet | Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn M. Croxford, Ruth Isaranawatchai, Wanrudee Menjak, Ines B. Petrella, Teresa M. Mittmann, Nicole Earle, Craig C. Gavura, Scott Hanna, Timothy P. Chan, Kelvin K.W. |
author_sort | Dai, Wei Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For novel cancer treatments, effectiveness in clinical practice is not always aligned with clinical efficacy results. As such it is important to understand a treatment’s real-world effectiveness. We examined real-world population-based comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab versus non-ipilimumab treatments (chemotherapy or targeted treatments). METHODS: We used a cohort of melanoma patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced disease since April 2005 from Ontario, Canada. Patients were identified from provincial drug databases and the Ontario Cancer Registry who received second-line ipilimumab from 2012 to 2015 (treated) or second-line non-ipilimumab treatment prior to 2012 (historical controls). Historical controls were chosen, to permit the most direct comparison to pivotal trial findings. The cohort was linked to administrative databases to identify baseline characteristics and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess overall survival (OS). Observed potential confounders were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: We identified 329 patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) who had received second-line treatments (189 treated; 140 controls). Patients receiving second-line ipilimumab were older (61.7 years vs 55.2 years) compared to historical controls. Median OS were 6.9 (95% CI: 5.4–8.3) and 4.95 (4.3–6.0) months for ipilimumab and controls, respectively. The crude 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS probabilities were 34.3% (27–41%), 20.6% (15–27%), and 15.2% (9.6–21%) for ipilimumab and 17.1% (11–23%), 7.1% (2.9–11%), and 4.7% (1.2–8.2%) for controls. Ipilimumab was associated with improved OS (IPTW HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49–0.78; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis suggests second-line ipilimumab is associated with an improvement in OS for MM patients in routine practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7158109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71581092020-04-21 Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn M. Croxford, Ruth Isaranawatchai, Wanrudee Menjak, Ines B. Petrella, Teresa M. Mittmann, Nicole Earle, Craig C. Gavura, Scott Hanna, Timothy P. Chan, Kelvin K.W. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: For novel cancer treatments, effectiveness in clinical practice is not always aligned with clinical efficacy results. As such it is important to understand a treatment’s real-world effectiveness. We examined real-world population-based comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab versus non-ipilimumab treatments (chemotherapy or targeted treatments). METHODS: We used a cohort of melanoma patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced disease since April 2005 from Ontario, Canada. Patients were identified from provincial drug databases and the Ontario Cancer Registry who received second-line ipilimumab from 2012 to 2015 (treated) or second-line non-ipilimumab treatment prior to 2012 (historical controls). Historical controls were chosen, to permit the most direct comparison to pivotal trial findings. The cohort was linked to administrative databases to identify baseline characteristics and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess overall survival (OS). Observed potential confounders were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: We identified 329 patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) who had received second-line treatments (189 treated; 140 controls). Patients receiving second-line ipilimumab were older (61.7 years vs 55.2 years) compared to historical controls. Median OS were 6.9 (95% CI: 5.4–8.3) and 4.95 (4.3–6.0) months for ipilimumab and controls, respectively. The crude 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS probabilities were 34.3% (27–41%), 20.6% (15–27%), and 15.2% (9.6–21%) for ipilimumab and 17.1% (11–23%), 7.1% (2.9–11%), and 4.7% (1.2–8.2%) for controls. Ipilimumab was associated with improved OS (IPTW HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49–0.78; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis suggests second-line ipilimumab is associated with an improvement in OS for MM patients in routine practice. BioMed Central 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7158109/ /pubmed/32293341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06798-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn M. Croxford, Ruth Isaranawatchai, Wanrudee Menjak, Ines B. Petrella, Teresa M. Mittmann, Nicole Earle, Craig C. Gavura, Scott Hanna, Timothy P. Chan, Kelvin K.W. Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title | Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full | Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr | Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title_short | Real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada |
title_sort | real-world comparative effectiveness of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: a population-based cohort study in ontario, canada |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06798-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daiweifang realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT becajaclynm realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT croxfordruth realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT isaranawatchaiwanrudee realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT menjakinesb realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT petrellateresam realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT mittmannnicole realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT earlecraigc realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT gavurascott realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT hannatimothyp realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada AT chankelvinkw realworldcomparativeeffectivenessofsecondlineipilimumabformetastaticmelanomaapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontariocanada |