Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial

BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobban, Fiona, Akers, Nadia, Appelbe, Duncan, Chapman, Lesley, Collinge, Lizzi, Dodd, Susanna, Flowers, Sue, Hollingsworth, Bruce, Johnson, Sonia, Jones, Steven H., Mateus, Ceu, Mezes, Barbara, Murray, Elizabeth, Panagaki, Katerina, Rainford, Naomi, Robinson, Heather, Rosala-Hallas, Anna, Sellwood, William, Walker, Andrew, Williamson, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9
_version_ 1783522482451382272
author Lobban, Fiona
Akers, Nadia
Appelbe, Duncan
Chapman, Lesley
Collinge, Lizzi
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Murray, Elizabeth
Panagaki, Katerina
Rainford, Naomi
Robinson, Heather
Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Sellwood, William
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
author_facet Lobban, Fiona
Akers, Nadia
Appelbe, Duncan
Chapman, Lesley
Collinge, Lizzi
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Murray, Elizabeth
Panagaki, Katerina
Rainford, Naomi
Robinson, Heather
Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Sellwood, William
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
author_sort Lobban, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of REACT including a Resource Directory (RD), versus RD-only. METHODS: A primarily online, observer-blind randomised controlled trial comparing REACT (including RD) with RD only (registration ISRCTN72019945). Participants were UK relatives aged > = 16, with high distress (assessed using the GHQ-28), and actively help-seeking, individually randomised, and assessed online. Primary outcome was relatives’ distress (GHQ-28) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing, support, costs and user feedback. RESULTS: We recruited 800 relatives (REACT = 399; RD only = 401) with high distress at baseline (GHQ-28 REACT mean 40.3, SD 14.6; RD only mean 40.0, SD 14.0). Median time spent online on REACT was 50.8 min (IQR 12.4–172.1) versus 0.5 min (IQR 0–1.6) on RD only. Retention to primary follow-up (24 weeks) was 75% (REACT n = 292 (73.2%); RD-only n = 307 (76.6%)). Distress decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups (− 1.39, 95% CI -3.60, 0.83, p = 0.22). Estimated cost of delivering REACT was £62.27 per person and users reported finding it safe, acceptable and convenient. There were no adverse events or reported side effects. CONCLUSIONS: REACT is an inexpensive, acceptable, and safe way to deliver NICE-recommended support for relatives. However, for highly distressed relatives it is no more effective in reducing distress (GHQ-28) than a comprehensive online resource directory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN72019945 prospectively registered 19/11/2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7158157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71581572020-04-21 Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial Lobban, Fiona Akers, Nadia Appelbe, Duncan Chapman, Lesley Collinge, Lizzi Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Hollingsworth, Bruce Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Murray, Elizabeth Panagaki, Katerina Rainford, Naomi Robinson, Heather Rosala-Hallas, Anna Sellwood, William Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of REACT including a Resource Directory (RD), versus RD-only. METHODS: A primarily online, observer-blind randomised controlled trial comparing REACT (including RD) with RD only (registration ISRCTN72019945). Participants were UK relatives aged > = 16, with high distress (assessed using the GHQ-28), and actively help-seeking, individually randomised, and assessed online. Primary outcome was relatives’ distress (GHQ-28) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing, support, costs and user feedback. RESULTS: We recruited 800 relatives (REACT = 399; RD only = 401) with high distress at baseline (GHQ-28 REACT mean 40.3, SD 14.6; RD only mean 40.0, SD 14.0). Median time spent online on REACT was 50.8 min (IQR 12.4–172.1) versus 0.5 min (IQR 0–1.6) on RD only. Retention to primary follow-up (24 weeks) was 75% (REACT n = 292 (73.2%); RD-only n = 307 (76.6%)). Distress decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups (− 1.39, 95% CI -3.60, 0.83, p = 0.22). Estimated cost of delivering REACT was £62.27 per person and users reported finding it safe, acceptable and convenient. There were no adverse events or reported side effects. CONCLUSIONS: REACT is an inexpensive, acceptable, and safe way to deliver NICE-recommended support for relatives. However, for highly distressed relatives it is no more effective in reducing distress (GHQ-28) than a comprehensive online resource directory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN72019945 prospectively registered 19/11/2015. BioMed Central 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7158157/ /pubmed/32290827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lobban, Fiona
Akers, Nadia
Appelbe, Duncan
Chapman, Lesley
Collinge, Lizzi
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Murray, Elizabeth
Panagaki, Katerina
Rainford, Naomi
Robinson, Heather
Rosala-Hallas, Anna
Sellwood, William
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title_full Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title_short Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
title_sort clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (react): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbanfiona clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT akersnadia clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT appelbeduncan clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT chapmanlesley clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT collingelizzi clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT doddsusanna clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT flowerssue clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT hollingsworthbruce clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT johnsonsonia clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT jonesstevenh clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT mateusceu clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT mezesbarbara clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT murrayelizabeth clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT panagakikaterina clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT rainfordnaomi clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT robinsonheather clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT rosalahallasanna clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT sellwoodwilliam clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT walkerandrew clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial
AT williamsonpaula clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial