Cargando…
Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9 |
_version_ | 1783522482451382272 |
---|---|
author | Lobban, Fiona Akers, Nadia Appelbe, Duncan Chapman, Lesley Collinge, Lizzi Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Hollingsworth, Bruce Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Murray, Elizabeth Panagaki, Katerina Rainford, Naomi Robinson, Heather Rosala-Hallas, Anna Sellwood, William Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula |
author_facet | Lobban, Fiona Akers, Nadia Appelbe, Duncan Chapman, Lesley Collinge, Lizzi Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Hollingsworth, Bruce Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Murray, Elizabeth Panagaki, Katerina Rainford, Naomi Robinson, Heather Rosala-Hallas, Anna Sellwood, William Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula |
author_sort | Lobban, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of REACT including a Resource Directory (RD), versus RD-only. METHODS: A primarily online, observer-blind randomised controlled trial comparing REACT (including RD) with RD only (registration ISRCTN72019945). Participants were UK relatives aged > = 16, with high distress (assessed using the GHQ-28), and actively help-seeking, individually randomised, and assessed online. Primary outcome was relatives’ distress (GHQ-28) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing, support, costs and user feedback. RESULTS: We recruited 800 relatives (REACT = 399; RD only = 401) with high distress at baseline (GHQ-28 REACT mean 40.3, SD 14.6; RD only mean 40.0, SD 14.0). Median time spent online on REACT was 50.8 min (IQR 12.4–172.1) versus 0.5 min (IQR 0–1.6) on RD only. Retention to primary follow-up (24 weeks) was 75% (REACT n = 292 (73.2%); RD-only n = 307 (76.6%)). Distress decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups (− 1.39, 95% CI -3.60, 0.83, p = 0.22). Estimated cost of delivering REACT was £62.27 per person and users reported finding it safe, acceptable and convenient. There were no adverse events or reported side effects. CONCLUSIONS: REACT is an inexpensive, acceptable, and safe way to deliver NICE-recommended support for relatives. However, for highly distressed relatives it is no more effective in reducing distress (GHQ-28) than a comprehensive online resource directory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN72019945 prospectively registered 19/11/2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7158157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71581572020-04-21 Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial Lobban, Fiona Akers, Nadia Appelbe, Duncan Chapman, Lesley Collinge, Lizzi Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Hollingsworth, Bruce Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Murray, Elizabeth Panagaki, Katerina Rainford, Naomi Robinson, Heather Rosala-Hallas, Anna Sellwood, William Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) is an online supported self-management toolkit for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar designed to improve access to NICE recommended information and emotional support. AIMS: Our aim was to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of REACT including a Resource Directory (RD), versus RD-only. METHODS: A primarily online, observer-blind randomised controlled trial comparing REACT (including RD) with RD only (registration ISRCTN72019945). Participants were UK relatives aged > = 16, with high distress (assessed using the GHQ-28), and actively help-seeking, individually randomised, and assessed online. Primary outcome was relatives’ distress (GHQ-28) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wellbeing, support, costs and user feedback. RESULTS: We recruited 800 relatives (REACT = 399; RD only = 401) with high distress at baseline (GHQ-28 REACT mean 40.3, SD 14.6; RD only mean 40.0, SD 14.0). Median time spent online on REACT was 50.8 min (IQR 12.4–172.1) versus 0.5 min (IQR 0–1.6) on RD only. Retention to primary follow-up (24 weeks) was 75% (REACT n = 292 (73.2%); RD-only n = 307 (76.6%)). Distress decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups (− 1.39, 95% CI -3.60, 0.83, p = 0.22). Estimated cost of delivering REACT was £62.27 per person and users reported finding it safe, acceptable and convenient. There were no adverse events or reported side effects. CONCLUSIONS: REACT is an inexpensive, acceptable, and safe way to deliver NICE-recommended support for relatives. However, for highly distressed relatives it is no more effective in reducing distress (GHQ-28) than a comprehensive online resource directory. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN72019945 prospectively registered 19/11/2015. BioMed Central 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7158157/ /pubmed/32290827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lobban, Fiona Akers, Nadia Appelbe, Duncan Chapman, Lesley Collinge, Lizzi Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Hollingsworth, Bruce Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Murray, Elizabeth Panagaki, Katerina Rainford, Naomi Robinson, Heather Rosala-Hallas, Anna Sellwood, William Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title | Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title_full | Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title_short | Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
title_sort | clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (react): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7158157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lobbanfiona clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT akersnadia clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT appelbeduncan clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT chapmanlesley clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT collingelizzi clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT doddsusanna clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT flowerssue clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT hollingsworthbruce clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT johnsonsonia clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT jonesstevenh clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT mateusceu clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT mezesbarbara clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT murrayelizabeth clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT panagakikaterina clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT rainfordnaomi clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT robinsonheather clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT rosalahallasanna clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT sellwoodwilliam clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT walkerandrew clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial AT williamsonpaula clinicaleffectivenessofawebbasedpeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolarreactonlineobserverblindrandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrial |