Cargando…

"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media

BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Döbrössy, Bence, Girasek, Edmond, Susánszky, Anna, Koncz, Zsuzsa, Győrffy, Zsuzsa, Bognár, Virág Katalin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32294139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422
_version_ 1783522621778821120
author Döbrössy, Bence
Girasek, Edmond
Susánszky, Anna
Koncz, Zsuzsa
Győrffy, Zsuzsa
Bognár, Virág Katalin
author_facet Döbrössy, Bence
Girasek, Edmond
Susánszky, Anna
Koncz, Zsuzsa
Győrffy, Zsuzsa
Bognár, Virág Katalin
author_sort Döbrössy, Bence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as channels by screening providers to reach under-screened women may have considerable public health significance. OBJECTIVES: By systematically reviewing original research studies on breast cancer related social media discourse, we had two aims: first, to assess the volume, participants and content of breast screening social media communication and second, to find out whether social media can be used by screening organisers as a channel of patient education. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Springer and Ebsco, 17 studies were found that met our criteria. A systematic narrative framework was used for data synthesis. Owing to the high degree of heterogeneity in social media channels, outcomes and measurement included in this study, a meta-analytic approach was not appropriate. RESULTS: The volume of breast cancer related social media discourse is considerable. The majority of participants are lay individuals as opposed to healthcare professionals or advocacy groups. The lay misunderstandings surrounding the harms and benefits of mammography is well mirrored in the content of social media discourse. Although there is criticism, breast cancer screening sentiment on the social media ranges from the neutral to the positive. Social media is suitable for offering peer emotional support for potential participants. CONCLUSION: Dedicated breast screening websites operated by screening organisers would ensure much needed quality controlled information and also provide space for reliable question and answer forums, the sharing of personal experience and the provision of peer and professional support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7159232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71592322020-04-22 "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media Döbrössy, Bence Girasek, Edmond Susánszky, Anna Koncz, Zsuzsa Győrffy, Zsuzsa Bognár, Virág Katalin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as channels by screening providers to reach under-screened women may have considerable public health significance. OBJECTIVES: By systematically reviewing original research studies on breast cancer related social media discourse, we had two aims: first, to assess the volume, participants and content of breast screening social media communication and second, to find out whether social media can be used by screening organisers as a channel of patient education. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Springer and Ebsco, 17 studies were found that met our criteria. A systematic narrative framework was used for data synthesis. Owing to the high degree of heterogeneity in social media channels, outcomes and measurement included in this study, a meta-analytic approach was not appropriate. RESULTS: The volume of breast cancer related social media discourse is considerable. The majority of participants are lay individuals as opposed to healthcare professionals or advocacy groups. The lay misunderstandings surrounding the harms and benefits of mammography is well mirrored in the content of social media discourse. Although there is criticism, breast cancer screening sentiment on the social media ranges from the neutral to the positive. Social media is suitable for offering peer emotional support for potential participants. CONCLUSION: Dedicated breast screening websites operated by screening organisers would ensure much needed quality controlled information and also provide space for reliable question and answer forums, the sharing of personal experience and the provision of peer and professional support. Public Library of Science 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7159232/ /pubmed/32294139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422 Text en © 2020 Döbrössy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Döbrössy, Bence
Girasek, Edmond
Susánszky, Anna
Koncz, Zsuzsa
Győrffy, Zsuzsa
Bognár, Virág Katalin
"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title_full "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title_fullStr "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title_full_unstemmed "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title_short "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
title_sort "clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32294139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422
work_keys_str_mv AT dobrossybence clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia
AT girasekedmond clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia
AT susanszkyanna clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia
AT konczzsuzsa clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia
AT gyorffyzsuzsa clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia
AT bognarviragkatalin clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia