Cargando…

Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muto, Mayu, Satake, Toshihiko, Masuda, Yuma, Kobayashi, Saya, Tamura, Shihoko, Kobayashi, Shinji, Ohtake, Tohru, Maegawa, Jiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660
_version_ 1783522674320867328
author Muto, Mayu
Satake, Toshihiko
Masuda, Yuma
Kobayashi, Saya
Tamura, Shihoko
Kobayashi, Shinji
Ohtake, Tohru
Maegawa, Jiro
author_facet Muto, Mayu
Satake, Toshihiko
Masuda, Yuma
Kobayashi, Saya
Tamura, Shihoko
Kobayashi, Shinji
Ohtake, Tohru
Maegawa, Jiro
author_sort Muto, Mayu
collection PubMed
description The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions in which the recipient internal mammary vein (IMV) was lacking. In the first case, a 50-year-old patient underwent delayed two-stage reconstruction, and in the second, a 45-year-old patient underwent delayed reconstruction because of capsular contracture following breast implant reconstruction. Neither patient received preoperative radiation therapy. During IMA/V preparation, we could not find the internal mammary vein (IMV) around the internal mammary artery (IMA) despite careful dissection. No internal mammary lymph node adenopathy and vascular encasement from metastasis were noted. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography revealed absence of IMV, which was presumed to be congenital. Therefore, microsurgical anastomosis was performed to connect the deep inferior epigastric vessels to the thoracodorsal vessel. The postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Although many anatomical studies have revealed different locations, diameters, branching patterns, and perforators of the IMA/V, absent IMV has been reported very rarely. In autologous breast reconstruction, plastic surgeons should be prepared for the possibility of the absence of IMV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7159964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71599642020-04-17 Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Muto, Mayu Satake, Toshihiko Masuda, Yuma Kobayashi, Saya Tamura, Shihoko Kobayashi, Shinji Ohtake, Tohru Maegawa, Jiro Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Case Report The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions in which the recipient internal mammary vein (IMV) was lacking. In the first case, a 50-year-old patient underwent delayed two-stage reconstruction, and in the second, a 45-year-old patient underwent delayed reconstruction because of capsular contracture following breast implant reconstruction. Neither patient received preoperative radiation therapy. During IMA/V preparation, we could not find the internal mammary vein (IMV) around the internal mammary artery (IMA) despite careful dissection. No internal mammary lymph node adenopathy and vascular encasement from metastasis were noted. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography revealed absence of IMV, which was presumed to be congenital. Therefore, microsurgical anastomosis was performed to connect the deep inferior epigastric vessels to the thoracodorsal vessel. The postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Although many anatomical studies have revealed different locations, diameters, branching patterns, and perforators of the IMA/V, absent IMV has been reported very rarely. In autologous breast reconstruction, plastic surgeons should be prepared for the possibility of the absence of IMV. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7159964/ /pubmed/32309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Case Report
Muto, Mayu
Satake, Toshihiko
Masuda, Yuma
Kobayashi, Saya
Tamura, Shihoko
Kobayashi, Shinji
Ohtake, Tohru
Maegawa, Jiro
Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_short Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_sort absent internal mammary recipient vein in autologous breast reconstruction
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660
work_keys_str_mv AT mutomayu absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT sataketoshihiko absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT masudayuma absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT kobayashisaya absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT tamurashihoko absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT kobayashishinji absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT ohtaketohru absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction
AT maegawajiro absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction