Cargando…
Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep infe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660 |
_version_ | 1783522674320867328 |
---|---|
author | Muto, Mayu Satake, Toshihiko Masuda, Yuma Kobayashi, Saya Tamura, Shihoko Kobayashi, Shinji Ohtake, Tohru Maegawa, Jiro |
author_facet | Muto, Mayu Satake, Toshihiko Masuda, Yuma Kobayashi, Saya Tamura, Shihoko Kobayashi, Shinji Ohtake, Tohru Maegawa, Jiro |
author_sort | Muto, Mayu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions in which the recipient internal mammary vein (IMV) was lacking. In the first case, a 50-year-old patient underwent delayed two-stage reconstruction, and in the second, a 45-year-old patient underwent delayed reconstruction because of capsular contracture following breast implant reconstruction. Neither patient received preoperative radiation therapy. During IMA/V preparation, we could not find the internal mammary vein (IMV) around the internal mammary artery (IMA) despite careful dissection. No internal mammary lymph node adenopathy and vascular encasement from metastasis were noted. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography revealed absence of IMV, which was presumed to be congenital. Therefore, microsurgical anastomosis was performed to connect the deep inferior epigastric vessels to the thoracodorsal vessel. The postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Although many anatomical studies have revealed different locations, diameters, branching patterns, and perforators of the IMA/V, absent IMV has been reported very rarely. In autologous breast reconstruction, plastic surgeons should be prepared for the possibility of the absence of IMV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7159964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71599642020-04-17 Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Muto, Mayu Satake, Toshihiko Masuda, Yuma Kobayashi, Saya Tamura, Shihoko Kobayashi, Shinji Ohtake, Tohru Maegawa, Jiro Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Case Report The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions in which the recipient internal mammary vein (IMV) was lacking. In the first case, a 50-year-old patient underwent delayed two-stage reconstruction, and in the second, a 45-year-old patient underwent delayed reconstruction because of capsular contracture following breast implant reconstruction. Neither patient received preoperative radiation therapy. During IMA/V preparation, we could not find the internal mammary vein (IMV) around the internal mammary artery (IMA) despite careful dissection. No internal mammary lymph node adenopathy and vascular encasement from metastasis were noted. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography revealed absence of IMV, which was presumed to be congenital. Therefore, microsurgical anastomosis was performed to connect the deep inferior epigastric vessels to the thoracodorsal vessel. The postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Although many anatomical studies have revealed different locations, diameters, branching patterns, and perforators of the IMA/V, absent IMV has been reported very rarely. In autologous breast reconstruction, plastic surgeons should be prepared for the possibility of the absence of IMV. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7159964/ /pubmed/32309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Muto, Mayu Satake, Toshihiko Masuda, Yuma Kobayashi, Saya Tamura, Shihoko Kobayashi, Shinji Ohtake, Tohru Maegawa, Jiro Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title | Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | absent internal mammary recipient vein in autologous breast reconstruction |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mutomayu absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT sataketoshihiko absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT masudayuma absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT kobayashisaya absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT tamurashihoko absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT kobayashishinji absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT ohtaketohru absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction AT maegawajiro absentinternalmammaryrecipientveininautologousbreastreconstruction |