Cargando…

Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical performance of an ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) system. METHODS: The physico-technical capabilities of a novel commercial UHRCT system were assessed and compared with those of a current-generation multi-detector (MDCT) system. The super-high-resolution (SHR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oostveen, Luuk J., Boedeker, Kirsten L., Brink, Monique, Prokop, Mathias, de Lange, Frank, Sechopoulos, Ioannis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5
_version_ 1783522686091132928
author Oostveen, Luuk J.
Boedeker, Kirsten L.
Brink, Monique
Prokop, Mathias
de Lange, Frank
Sechopoulos, Ioannis
author_facet Oostveen, Luuk J.
Boedeker, Kirsten L.
Brink, Monique
Prokop, Mathias
de Lange, Frank
Sechopoulos, Ioannis
author_sort Oostveen, Luuk J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical performance of an ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) system. METHODS: The physico-technical capabilities of a novel commercial UHRCT system were assessed and compared with those of a current-generation multi-detector (MDCT) system. The super-high-resolution (SHR) mode of the system uses 0.25 mm (at isocentre) detector elements (dels) in the in-plane and longitudinal directions, while the high-resolution (HR) mode bins two dels in the longitudinal direction. The normal-resolution (NR) mode bins dels 2 × 2, resulting in a del-size equivalent to that of the MDCT system. In general, standard procedures and phantoms were used to perform these assessments. RESULTS: The UHRCT MTF (10% MTF 4.1 lp/mm) is twice as high as that of the MDCT (10% MTF 1.9 lp/mm), which is comparable to the MTF in the NR mode (10% MTF 1.7 lp/mm). The width of the slice sensitivity profile in the SHR mode (FWHM 0.45 mm) is about 60% of that of the MDCT (FWHM 0.77 mm). Uniformity and CT numbers are within the expected range. Noise in the high-resolution modes has a higher magnitude and higher frequency components compared with MDCT. Low-contrast visibility is lower for the NR, HR and SHR modes compared with MDCT, but about a 14%, for NR, and 23%, for HR and SHR, dose increase gives the same results. CONCLUSIONS: HR and SHR mode scanning results in double the spatial resolution, with about a 23% increase in dose required to achieve the same low-contrast detectability. KEY POINTS: • Resolution on UHRCT is up to twice as high as for the tested MDCT. • With abdominal settings, UHRCT needs higher dose for the same low-contrast detectability as MDCT, but dose is still below achievable levels as defined by current diagnostic reference levels. • The UHRCT system used in normal-resolution mode yields comparable resolution and noise characteristics as the MDCT system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71600792020-04-23 Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner Oostveen, Luuk J. Boedeker, Kirsten L. Brink, Monique Prokop, Mathias de Lange, Frank Sechopoulos, Ioannis Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical performance of an ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) system. METHODS: The physico-technical capabilities of a novel commercial UHRCT system were assessed and compared with those of a current-generation multi-detector (MDCT) system. The super-high-resolution (SHR) mode of the system uses 0.25 mm (at isocentre) detector elements (dels) in the in-plane and longitudinal directions, while the high-resolution (HR) mode bins two dels in the longitudinal direction. The normal-resolution (NR) mode bins dels 2 × 2, resulting in a del-size equivalent to that of the MDCT system. In general, standard procedures and phantoms were used to perform these assessments. RESULTS: The UHRCT MTF (10% MTF 4.1 lp/mm) is twice as high as that of the MDCT (10% MTF 1.9 lp/mm), which is comparable to the MTF in the NR mode (10% MTF 1.7 lp/mm). The width of the slice sensitivity profile in the SHR mode (FWHM 0.45 mm) is about 60% of that of the MDCT (FWHM 0.77 mm). Uniformity and CT numbers are within the expected range. Noise in the high-resolution modes has a higher magnitude and higher frequency components compared with MDCT. Low-contrast visibility is lower for the NR, HR and SHR modes compared with MDCT, but about a 14%, for NR, and 23%, for HR and SHR, dose increase gives the same results. CONCLUSIONS: HR and SHR mode scanning results in double the spatial resolution, with about a 23% increase in dose required to achieve the same low-contrast detectability. KEY POINTS: • Resolution on UHRCT is up to twice as high as for the tested MDCT. • With abdominal settings, UHRCT needs higher dose for the same low-contrast detectability as MDCT, but dose is still below achievable levels as defined by current diagnostic reference levels. • The UHRCT system used in normal-resolution mode yields comparable resolution and noise characteristics as the MDCT system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7160079/ /pubmed/32040726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Oostveen, Luuk J.
Boedeker, Kirsten L.
Brink, Monique
Prokop, Mathias
de Lange, Frank
Sechopoulos, Ioannis
Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title_full Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title_fullStr Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title_full_unstemmed Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title_short Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner
title_sort physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution ct scanner
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06635-5
work_keys_str_mv AT oostveenluukj physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner
AT boedekerkirstenl physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner
AT brinkmonique physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner
AT prokopmathias physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner
AT delangefrank physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner
AT sechopoulosioannis physicalevaluationofanultrahighresolutionctscanner