Cargando…

Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE: Early facial nerve palsy (eFNP) is the most frequent complication of the parotidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in parotid surgery, which aims at reducing eFNP, has not evolved any further than the mere differentiation between the nerve and the surrounding tissue. Continuous I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stankovic, Petar, Wittlinger, Jan, Georgiew, Robert, Dominas, Nina, Reimann, Katrin, Hoch, Stephan, Wilhelm, Thomas, Günzel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05803-4
_version_ 1783522688878247936
author Stankovic, Petar
Wittlinger, Jan
Georgiew, Robert
Dominas, Nina
Reimann, Katrin
Hoch, Stephan
Wilhelm, Thomas
Günzel, Thomas
author_facet Stankovic, Petar
Wittlinger, Jan
Georgiew, Robert
Dominas, Nina
Reimann, Katrin
Hoch, Stephan
Wilhelm, Thomas
Günzel, Thomas
author_sort Stankovic, Petar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Early facial nerve palsy (eFNP) is the most frequent complication of the parotidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in parotid surgery, which aims at reducing eFNP, has not evolved any further than the mere differentiation between the nerve and the surrounding tissue. Continuous IONM (cIONM), used in thyroid and posterior fossa surgery, has developed over the past years and has proved beneficial in reducing the rate of paresis in cases where a pattern of impending nerve injury is identified. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the safety of using the stimulating electrode (Saxophone(®)) for cIONM in parotid surgery. METHODS: From 2016 to 2018, 40 patients who were referred for primary parotidectomy under cIONM according to our study protocol (registered at the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00011051, http://www.drks.de; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch) were included in this study. All patients with a normal preoperative facial nerve function [House–Brackman (HB)-Index 1] underwent surgery using continuous facial nerve stimulation with the Saxophone(®) electrode (system AVALANCHE XT, Dr. Langer Medical, Waldkirch, Germany). A control group which underwent parotidectomies with only intermittent IONM was recruited from our records. RESULTS: Half of the patients in our study group suffered from eFNP. All except one regained normal facial nerve function within 6 months of surgery. There was no significant difference regarding eFNP when compared to the control group without cIONM (p = 0.11). No statistically significant correlation between the stimulation threshold (p = 0.74) or the duration of nerve stimulation and eFNP was found (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the safety of using the Saxophone(®)-electrode for cIONM of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. Future development of this method could enable the recognition of impending nerve injury and thus reduce eFNP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71600922020-04-23 Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study Stankovic, Petar Wittlinger, Jan Georgiew, Robert Dominas, Nina Reimann, Katrin Hoch, Stephan Wilhelm, Thomas Günzel, Thomas Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: Early facial nerve palsy (eFNP) is the most frequent complication of the parotidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in parotid surgery, which aims at reducing eFNP, has not evolved any further than the mere differentiation between the nerve and the surrounding tissue. Continuous IONM (cIONM), used in thyroid and posterior fossa surgery, has developed over the past years and has proved beneficial in reducing the rate of paresis in cases where a pattern of impending nerve injury is identified. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the safety of using the stimulating electrode (Saxophone(®)) for cIONM in parotid surgery. METHODS: From 2016 to 2018, 40 patients who were referred for primary parotidectomy under cIONM according to our study protocol (registered at the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00011051, http://www.drks.de; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch) were included in this study. All patients with a normal preoperative facial nerve function [House–Brackman (HB)-Index 1] underwent surgery using continuous facial nerve stimulation with the Saxophone(®) electrode (system AVALANCHE XT, Dr. Langer Medical, Waldkirch, Germany). A control group which underwent parotidectomies with only intermittent IONM was recruited from our records. RESULTS: Half of the patients in our study group suffered from eFNP. All except one regained normal facial nerve function within 6 months of surgery. There was no significant difference regarding eFNP when compared to the control group without cIONM (p = 0.11). No statistically significant correlation between the stimulation threshold (p = 0.74) or the duration of nerve stimulation and eFNP was found (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the safety of using the Saxophone(®)-electrode for cIONM of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. Future development of this method could enable the recognition of impending nerve injury and thus reduce eFNP. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7160092/ /pubmed/31989270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05803-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Stankovic, Petar
Wittlinger, Jan
Georgiew, Robert
Dominas, Nina
Reimann, Katrin
Hoch, Stephan
Wilhelm, Thomas
Günzel, Thomas
Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title_full Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title_short Safety of the “Saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
title_sort safety of the “saxophone(®)” electrode in parotid surgery for continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring of the facial nerve: results of a pro- and retrospective cohort study
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05803-4
work_keys_str_mv AT stankovicpetar safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wittlingerjan safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT georgiewrobert safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dominasnina safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT reimannkatrin safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hochstephan safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wilhelmthomas safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gunzelthomas safetyofthesaxophoneelectrodeinparotidsurgeryforcontinuousintraoperativeneuromonitoringofthefacialnerveresultsofaproandretrospectivecohortstudy