Cargando…

Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study

PURPOSE: Knowledge of disease-specific instruments enables the evaluation of health- related quality-of-life (QoL) change associated with chronic and recurrent tonsillitis in adults. The main objective was to explore the interpretation of scores according to the throat-related QoL instrument, Tonsil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laajala, Aleksi, Autio, Timo J., Ohtonen, Pasi, Alho, Olli-Pekka, Koskenkorva, Timo J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z
_version_ 1783522689831403520
author Laajala, Aleksi
Autio, Timo J.
Ohtonen, Pasi
Alho, Olli-Pekka
Koskenkorva, Timo J.
author_facet Laajala, Aleksi
Autio, Timo J.
Ohtonen, Pasi
Alho, Olli-Pekka
Koskenkorva, Timo J.
author_sort Laajala, Aleksi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Knowledge of disease-specific instruments enables the evaluation of health- related quality-of-life (QoL) change associated with chronic and recurrent tonsillitis in adults. The main objective was to explore the interpretation of scores according to the throat-related QoL instrument, Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 (TOI-14), by determining the typical scores in healthy subjects and patients and define the minimum important change (MIC). METHODS: We performed a prospective matched cohort study in a secondary care area of Oulu University Hospital. The surgical cohort consisted of 42 patients referred to tonsillectomy due to recurrent or chronic tonsillitis. The control cohort consisted of 42 age- and sex-matched healthy controls obtained from the escorts of patients in the same hospital. We translated and validated the Finnish TOI-14 instrument and collected TOI-14 scores at entry and at 6 months and compared results to the anchor question. RESULTS: At entry, the mean TOI-14 scores were significantly higher in the surgical cohort than in the control cohort [mean (95% confidence interval)] 33.0 (27.0–39.1) vs. 5.0 (3.6–6.4), respectively. At 6 months follow-up, the mean TOI-14 scores had improved markedly after tonsillectomy to the level of the control cohort. In the healthy population, the score was in most cases under 15.0 points. In patients, a score of about 20.0 indicated mild symptoms, 30.0 moderate symptoms and 40.0 or higher intense symptoms. The MIC value was 10.0 points. CONCLUSIONS: These results enable the more accurate interpretation of the scores of the only disease-specific QoL instrument for adult throat-related diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71600962020-04-23 Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study Laajala, Aleksi Autio, Timo J. Ohtonen, Pasi Alho, Olli-Pekka Koskenkorva, Timo J. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: Knowledge of disease-specific instruments enables the evaluation of health- related quality-of-life (QoL) change associated with chronic and recurrent tonsillitis in adults. The main objective was to explore the interpretation of scores according to the throat-related QoL instrument, Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 (TOI-14), by determining the typical scores in healthy subjects and patients and define the minimum important change (MIC). METHODS: We performed a prospective matched cohort study in a secondary care area of Oulu University Hospital. The surgical cohort consisted of 42 patients referred to tonsillectomy due to recurrent or chronic tonsillitis. The control cohort consisted of 42 age- and sex-matched healthy controls obtained from the escorts of patients in the same hospital. We translated and validated the Finnish TOI-14 instrument and collected TOI-14 scores at entry and at 6 months and compared results to the anchor question. RESULTS: At entry, the mean TOI-14 scores were significantly higher in the surgical cohort than in the control cohort [mean (95% confidence interval)] 33.0 (27.0–39.1) vs. 5.0 (3.6–6.4), respectively. At 6 months follow-up, the mean TOI-14 scores had improved markedly after tonsillectomy to the level of the control cohort. In the healthy population, the score was in most cases under 15.0 points. In patients, a score of about 20.0 indicated mild symptoms, 30.0 moderate symptoms and 40.0 or higher intense symptoms. The MIC value was 10.0 points. CONCLUSIONS: These results enable the more accurate interpretation of the scores of the only disease-specific QoL instrument for adult throat-related diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7160096/ /pubmed/32060601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Laajala, Aleksi
Autio, Timo J.
Ohtonen, Pasi
Alho, Olli-Pekka
Koskenkorva, Timo J.
Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title_full Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title_fullStr Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title_short Interpretation of Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
title_sort interpretation of tonsillectomy outcome inventory-14 scores: a prospective matched cohort study
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05832-z
work_keys_str_mv AT laajalaaleksi interpretationoftonsillectomyoutcomeinventory14scoresaprospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT autiotimoj interpretationoftonsillectomyoutcomeinventory14scoresaprospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT ohtonenpasi interpretationoftonsillectomyoutcomeinventory14scoresaprospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT alhoollipekka interpretationoftonsillectomyoutcomeinventory14scoresaprospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT koskenkorvatimoj interpretationoftonsillectomyoutcomeinventory14scoresaprospectivematchedcohortstudy