Cargando…
Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis
Herpes simplex labialis (HSL) is a viral disease that affects the perioral region. No guidelines recommending an effective treatment exist. The treatment of HSL with three different products was examined. Herpatch Serum, a film-forming patch, was compared to Compeed Patches, a set of semiocclusive h...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63530-6 |
_version_ | 1783522691019440128 |
---|---|
author | Boes, Hanna Goulioumis, Vlasios Wechsler, Anna Zimmer, Stefan Bizhang, Mozhgan |
author_facet | Boes, Hanna Goulioumis, Vlasios Wechsler, Anna Zimmer, Stefan Bizhang, Mozhgan |
author_sort | Boes, Hanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Herpes simplex labialis (HSL) is a viral disease that affects the perioral region. No guidelines recommending an effective treatment exist. The treatment of HSL with three different products was examined. Herpatch Serum, a film-forming patch, was compared to Compeed Patches, a set of semiocclusive hydrocolloid patches, and Zovirax Cream (ingredient: 5% acyclovir). In this prospective, randomized, examiner-blind study, 180 patients with recurrent HSL were split into three groups (Compeed: n = 60, Herpatch: n = 60, Zovirax: n = 60) and examined within 24 hours of HSL outbreak (DRKS Registration No.: DRKS00007786). The primary endpoint was healing time. The secondary endpoints were the reaction rate and quality of therapy evaluated by the Clinician’s Global Assessment of Therapy (CGAT) and the Subject’s Global Assessment of Therapy (SGAT) (0 = no response; 10 = excellent response), respectively. There was no significant difference among the healing times for the different products. The mean (95% confidence interval) was 9.67 days (9.11–10.22) for Compeed, 9.30 days (8.75–9.85) for Herpatch, and 9.80 days (9.30–10.30) for Zovirax. The reaction rate and quality of therapy (CGAT and SGAT) of Herpatch were significantly higher than those of Compeed and Zovirax. Within the study limitations, Herpatch proved to be an effective, non-antiviral alternative in the treatment of HSL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7160101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71601012020-04-22 Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis Boes, Hanna Goulioumis, Vlasios Wechsler, Anna Zimmer, Stefan Bizhang, Mozhgan Sci Rep Article Herpes simplex labialis (HSL) is a viral disease that affects the perioral region. No guidelines recommending an effective treatment exist. The treatment of HSL with three different products was examined. Herpatch Serum, a film-forming patch, was compared to Compeed Patches, a set of semiocclusive hydrocolloid patches, and Zovirax Cream (ingredient: 5% acyclovir). In this prospective, randomized, examiner-blind study, 180 patients with recurrent HSL were split into three groups (Compeed: n = 60, Herpatch: n = 60, Zovirax: n = 60) and examined within 24 hours of HSL outbreak (DRKS Registration No.: DRKS00007786). The primary endpoint was healing time. The secondary endpoints were the reaction rate and quality of therapy evaluated by the Clinician’s Global Assessment of Therapy (CGAT) and the Subject’s Global Assessment of Therapy (SGAT) (0 = no response; 10 = excellent response), respectively. There was no significant difference among the healing times for the different products. The mean (95% confidence interval) was 9.67 days (9.11–10.22) for Compeed, 9.30 days (8.75–9.85) for Herpatch, and 9.80 days (9.30–10.30) for Zovirax. The reaction rate and quality of therapy (CGAT and SGAT) of Herpatch were significantly higher than those of Compeed and Zovirax. Within the study limitations, Herpatch proved to be an effective, non-antiviral alternative in the treatment of HSL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7160101/ /pubmed/32296094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63530-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Boes, Hanna Goulioumis, Vlasios Wechsler, Anna Zimmer, Stefan Bizhang, Mozhgan Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title | Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title_full | Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title_short | Clinical Study on the Effectiveness of Three Products in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Labialis |
title_sort | clinical study on the effectiveness of three products in the treatment of herpes simplex labialis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63530-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boeshanna clinicalstudyontheeffectivenessofthreeproductsinthetreatmentofherpessimplexlabialis AT goulioumisvlasios clinicalstudyontheeffectivenessofthreeproductsinthetreatmentofherpessimplexlabialis AT wechsleranna clinicalstudyontheeffectivenessofthreeproductsinthetreatmentofherpessimplexlabialis AT zimmerstefan clinicalstudyontheeffectivenessofthreeproductsinthetreatmentofherpessimplexlabialis AT bizhangmozhgan clinicalstudyontheeffectivenessofthreeproductsinthetreatmentofherpessimplexlabialis |