Cargando…

Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving

Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Nicole, Desai, Saoirse Connor, Dewitt, Stephen, Hahn, Ulrike, Lagnado, David, Liefgreen, Alice, Phillips, Kirsty, Pilditch, Toby, Tešić, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660
_version_ 1783522734608744448
author Cruz, Nicole
Desai, Saoirse Connor
Dewitt, Stephen
Hahn, Ulrike
Lagnado, David
Liefgreen, Alice
Phillips, Kirsty
Pilditch, Toby
Tešić, Marko
author_facet Cruz, Nicole
Desai, Saoirse Connor
Dewitt, Stephen
Hahn, Ulrike
Lagnado, David
Liefgreen, Alice
Phillips, Kirsty
Pilditch, Toby
Tešić, Marko
author_sort Cruz, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network modeling techniques make it possible to model such problems and obtain precise predictions about the causal impact that changing the value of one variable may have on the values of other variables connected to it. But Bayesian modeling is itself complex, and has until now remained largely inaccessible to lay people. In a large scale lab experiment, we provide proof of principle that a Bayesian network modeling tool, adapted to provide basic training and guidance on the modeling process to beginners without requiring knowledge of the mathematical machinery working behind the scenes, significantly helps lay people find normative Bayesian solutions to complex problems, compared to generic training on probabilistic reasoning. We discuss the implications of this finding for the use of Bayesian network software tools in applied contexts such as security, medical, forensic, economic or environmental decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71603352020-04-23 Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving Cruz, Nicole Desai, Saoirse Connor Dewitt, Stephen Hahn, Ulrike Lagnado, David Liefgreen, Alice Phillips, Kirsty Pilditch, Toby Tešić, Marko Front Psychol Psychology Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network modeling techniques make it possible to model such problems and obtain precise predictions about the causal impact that changing the value of one variable may have on the values of other variables connected to it. But Bayesian modeling is itself complex, and has until now remained largely inaccessible to lay people. In a large scale lab experiment, we provide proof of principle that a Bayesian network modeling tool, adapted to provide basic training and guidance on the modeling process to beginners without requiring knowledge of the mathematical machinery working behind the scenes, significantly helps lay people find normative Bayesian solutions to complex problems, compared to generic training on probabilistic reasoning. We discuss the implications of this finding for the use of Bayesian network software tools in applied contexts such as security, medical, forensic, economic or environmental decision making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7160335/ /pubmed/32328015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660 Text en Copyright © 2020 Cruz, Desai, Dewitt, Hahn, Lagnado, Liefgreen, Phillips, Pilditch and Tešić. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cruz, Nicole
Desai, Saoirse Connor
Dewitt, Stephen
Hahn, Ulrike
Lagnado, David
Liefgreen, Alice
Phillips, Kirsty
Pilditch, Toby
Tešić, Marko
Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title_full Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title_fullStr Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title_full_unstemmed Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title_short Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
title_sort widening access to bayesian problem solving
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660
work_keys_str_mv AT cruznicole wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT desaisaoirseconnor wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT dewittstephen wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT hahnulrike wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT lagnadodavid wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT liefgreenalice wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT phillipskirsty wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT pilditchtoby wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving
AT tesicmarko wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving