Cargando…
Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving
Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660 |
_version_ | 1783522734608744448 |
---|---|
author | Cruz, Nicole Desai, Saoirse Connor Dewitt, Stephen Hahn, Ulrike Lagnado, David Liefgreen, Alice Phillips, Kirsty Pilditch, Toby Tešić, Marko |
author_facet | Cruz, Nicole Desai, Saoirse Connor Dewitt, Stephen Hahn, Ulrike Lagnado, David Liefgreen, Alice Phillips, Kirsty Pilditch, Toby Tešić, Marko |
author_sort | Cruz, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network modeling techniques make it possible to model such problems and obtain precise predictions about the causal impact that changing the value of one variable may have on the values of other variables connected to it. But Bayesian modeling is itself complex, and has until now remained largely inaccessible to lay people. In a large scale lab experiment, we provide proof of principle that a Bayesian network modeling tool, adapted to provide basic training and guidance on the modeling process to beginners without requiring knowledge of the mathematical machinery working behind the scenes, significantly helps lay people find normative Bayesian solutions to complex problems, compared to generic training on probabilistic reasoning. We discuss the implications of this finding for the use of Bayesian network software tools in applied contexts such as security, medical, forensic, economic or environmental decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7160335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71603352020-04-23 Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving Cruz, Nicole Desai, Saoirse Connor Dewitt, Stephen Hahn, Ulrike Lagnado, David Liefgreen, Alice Phillips, Kirsty Pilditch, Toby Tešić, Marko Front Psychol Psychology Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network modeling techniques make it possible to model such problems and obtain precise predictions about the causal impact that changing the value of one variable may have on the values of other variables connected to it. But Bayesian modeling is itself complex, and has until now remained largely inaccessible to lay people. In a large scale lab experiment, we provide proof of principle that a Bayesian network modeling tool, adapted to provide basic training and guidance on the modeling process to beginners without requiring knowledge of the mathematical machinery working behind the scenes, significantly helps lay people find normative Bayesian solutions to complex problems, compared to generic training on probabilistic reasoning. We discuss the implications of this finding for the use of Bayesian network software tools in applied contexts such as security, medical, forensic, economic or environmental decision making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7160335/ /pubmed/32328015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660 Text en Copyright © 2020 Cruz, Desai, Dewitt, Hahn, Lagnado, Liefgreen, Phillips, Pilditch and Tešić. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Cruz, Nicole Desai, Saoirse Connor Dewitt, Stephen Hahn, Ulrike Lagnado, David Liefgreen, Alice Phillips, Kirsty Pilditch, Toby Tešić, Marko Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title | Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title_full | Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title_fullStr | Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title_full_unstemmed | Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title_short | Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving |
title_sort | widening access to bayesian problem solving |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruznicole wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT desaisaoirseconnor wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT dewittstephen wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT hahnulrike wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT lagnadodavid wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT liefgreenalice wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT phillipskirsty wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT pilditchtoby wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving AT tesicmarko wideningaccesstobayesianproblemsolving |